Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3  All

Author Topic: Progressive monotubes on the front  (Read 9436 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

09 S/T FLTRSE3

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 95

    • CVO1: 2009 Silver/ Titanium FLTRSE3
Re: Progressive monotubes on the front
« Reply #15 on: March 18, 2012, 03:48:38 PM »

Finally installed them  on my 2009 FLTRSE3.  What a difference on bumpy roads.  Much more control as well as a smoother ride.   Does not dive as much when braking.  Should have done this a long time ago.

What a shame we pay 30k+ for a bike and then change the seat, pipes, shocks...... 

Did you install the stock height monotubes or the lowered ones?

Thanks
Logged

greglyon

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1444
  • 2013 FLHRSE5
    • AZ


    • CVO1: FLHRSE5
    • Phillips and Lyon LLC
Re: Progressive monotubes on the front
« Reply #16 on: March 18, 2012, 04:43:05 PM »

Did you install the stock height monotubes or the lowered ones?

Thanks
Stock height.  Don't believe in lowering the bikes
Logged
"A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory"

09 S/T FLTRSE3

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 95

    • CVO1: 2009 Silver/ Titanium FLTRSE3
Re: Progressive monotubes on the front
« Reply #17 on: March 19, 2012, 01:27:32 AM »

Stock height.  Don't believe in lowering the bikes

IROAR,

Thanks for the reply. I don't want to lower mine either. There's been some confusion as to wheather our bikes (09 FLTRSE3) are lowered from the factory or the same height as a stock touring bike.

Did you install all of the pre load spacers? I've read here that some have left one out.

Thanks again.
Logged

greglyon

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1444
  • 2013 FLHRSE5
    • AZ


    • CVO1: FLHRSE5
    • Phillips and Lyon LLC
Re: Progressive monotubes on the front
« Reply #18 on: March 19, 2012, 09:24:20 AM »

IROAR,

Thanks for the reply. I don't want to lower mine either. There's been some confusion as to wheather our bikes (09 FLTRSE3) are lowered from the factory or the same height as a stock touring bike.

Did you install all of the pre load spacers? I've read here that some have left one out.

Thanks again.

The front end of our bikes are the same height as the non-cvo bikes.  I believe the rear is 1 inch lower.  I don't know the answer regarding the pre-load spacers.  Had the new Harley Davidson of Scottsdale install them with admonition that I wanted the bike's height maintained. 
Logged
"A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory"

Scooterhair

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 410
  • DSP Member # 637.3
Re: Progressive monotubes on the front
« Reply #19 on: October 04, 2012, 10:19:59 AM »

I blew a fork seal Sturgis 2012 and needed to deal with it.  After a lot of research  I decided to go with the mono-tubes. I put the stock height in. Easy change over. Instead of replacing the rears I "Serviced" them.  Yes they are serviceable as long as they are not leaking. I sucked out 12 oz of oil in each. I replaced oil with 10wt oil, OEM is 5wt.   OMG  what a change in a bike. Road feel is so much better, it sucks up the bumps , braking is great. I do need to test how it feels when pulling the trailer though. . The bike feels like it should have from the MOCO.  The total cost was was about 320.00 for all of it.  The mono tubes online for 264.00 shipped and the rest went on oil, seals, bushings.
Here is some must read info on the rears    http://harleytechtalk.org/htt/index.php?topic=4449.0   :nervous:
It was so easy, everyone needs to do this. Well worth your time and cost.

Scooter  :coolblue:

Logged
2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8
2008 1500 RAM 4x4
2001 Blue FLTRSEI2
2003 Neosho trailer painted to match bike
1999 Blue Ness custom ( SOLD )
1997 Black & Champagne Wide Glide (The Wife's)
Big Ass 21' Dodge 3500

Beemer

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 690
  • USAF CMSgt (Ret)

    • CVO1: 2009 FLTRSE3 Electric Orange/Vivid Black
    • CVO2: 2015 FLTRUSE Autumn Haze/Carbon Dust
Re: Progressive monotubes on the front
« Reply #20 on: November 01, 2012, 07:54:32 AM »

Got'em plus the 440s out back...never bottoms-out like before and really improves steering response in cornering.  It truly is one of the first mods one should undertake...it will help keep you away from the undertaker! 
Logged

06cuse

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 56

    • CVO1: 01 FXDWG2 Traded to FlaHeatWave
    • CVO2: 06 FLTHCUSE 93k & Traded on a 10 FLHTK 73k traded on a Skunk
    • CVO3: 12 FLTRXSE Rollin Hard
Re: Progressive monotubes on the front
« Reply #21 on: November 03, 2012, 06:44:33 PM »

Rode the 12 FLTRXSE and took the 940's off of my 10 LTD and installed ~ MUCH Better ~ have the Monotubes ordered and should be installed this week ~ SemerFi
Logged
2012 FLTRXSE Skunk S&S 124/HPI 66, PV w A/T Pro~ Chopped Tour Pack, Lowers, 11" Tinted MadStad, S&S Power Tune Duals, Daymaker LED's, Adaptiv TPX Radar Detector, Fork Baffle, Pro 940's & Pro Monotubes, Baker DD7, Zumo 660, Vulcanworks Solid Sproket, Barnett Scorpion, Jaggs 10 Row oil Cooler w/Fan, Hayden M6.

dayne66

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4037
    • BC


    • CVO1: '12 Ruby/Typhoon SG
    • CVO2: '15 Superior Blue FLD Switchback
Re: Progressive monotubes on the front
« Reply #22 on: June 07, 2013, 11:15:28 AM »

Finally got them installed last days off.....could tell the difference going over the bump leaving the driveway.......and the improvement was substantial, as it was on the '08, on the road. Bumps and tracks that would jar my teeth were all but imperceptible with the Mono-Tubes!
Logged
"The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing." Socrates

dooinit2u

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2709
    • LA

    • CVO1: 2015 SESG UltraViolet Blue / Hot Lava ***SOLD***
Re: Progressive monotubes on the front
« Reply #23 on: June 07, 2013, 02:46:10 PM »

Finally got them installed last days off.....could tell the difference going over the bump leaving the driveway.......and the improvement was substantial, as it was on the '08, on the road. Bumps and tracks that would jar my teeth were all but imperceptible with the Mono-Tubes!

Awesome job... Going p/u CVO # 2 next week and the FIRST mod will be suspension. Did it on my 2010 and what a difference.

Congrats, now you looking for twisties to ride.
Logged

kojack

  • gearhead!
  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 292
    • NL


    • CVO1: 2001 Sceamin eagle road glide (custom)
Re: Progressive monotubes on the front
« Reply #24 on: December 22, 2013, 08:18:19 AM »

Im going with the monotubes, the top of the line progressive rear shocks,  and the progressive rear link.  stiffen the wet noodle a bit!. :jalapeno:
Logged
Mavericks RC
MFFM

Powered by gasoline and southern comfort!

dayne66

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4037
    • BC


    • CVO1: '12 Ruby/Typhoon SG
    • CVO2: '15 Superior Blue FLD Switchback
Re: Progressive monotubes on the front
« Reply #25 on: December 22, 2013, 10:38:34 AM »

Just for your info...Ohlin has come out with drop-ins for the front...one for rebound...one for compression. Saw the ad in Motorcycle Bagger.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2013, 11:46:20 AM by dayne66 »
Logged
"The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing." Socrates

kojack

  • gearhead!
  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 292
    • NL


    • CVO1: 2001 Sceamin eagle road glide (custom)
Re: Progressive monotubes on the front
« Reply #26 on: April 24, 2014, 05:56:49 AM »

Bringing this topic back for a refresh,  has anyone had problems with the drop ins from progressive?  I am getting ready to jump on them,  and the new 977 piggyback shock and suspension link.
Logged
Mavericks RC
MFFM

Powered by gasoline and southern comfort!

Twolanerider

  • 25K CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50545
  • EBCM #1.5 Emeritus DSP # ? Critter Gawker #?
    • MO


    • CVO1: 2000 Triple Red Screamin' Eagle Road Glide
    • CVO2: 2002 Candy Brandywine Screamin' Eagle Road King
    • CVO3: 1999 Arresting Red FXR2
Re: Progressive monotubes on the front
« Reply #27 on: April 24, 2014, 10:46:15 AM »

Bringing this topic back for a refresh,  has anyone had problems with the drop ins from progressive?  I am getting ready to jump on them,  and the new 977 piggyback shock and suspension link.

If memory serves the mftr's specs are that the gas cartridges lifespan is 50,000 miles.  So they are not a permanent installation and we know that going in.  Can remember a couple of instances here reporting earlier failures also.  Even knowing that going in still consider them to a be a cost effective alternative for the job they do.
Logged

kojack

  • gearhead!
  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 292
    • NL


    • CVO1: 2001 Sceamin eagle road glide (custom)
Re: Progressive monotubes on the front
« Reply #28 on: May 01, 2014, 11:16:47 AM »

cool!  im sold!
Logged
Mavericks RC
MFFM

Powered by gasoline and southern comfort!

FlaHeatWave

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2208

    • CVO1: '01 FXDWG2 RED 103 6sp
    • CVO2: '05 FLHTCSE2 CHERRY
    • CVO3: '09 FLTRSE3 YELLOW 117/DD7
Re: Progressive monotubes on the front
« Reply #29 on: May 01, 2014, 03:47:27 PM »

On the '09 SERG I prefer the ride quality of the H-D Premium Cartridges much over the PS. The H-D is more supple (maintains pavement contact better over bumps), not quite as precise, same brake dive characteristics, and a lot less "bouncy" than the PS.

PS will warranty the monos but not labor. H-D says to change the fork oil at the 50k service.

JMHO ~ Your results may vary :nixweiss:
Logged
"I've read dozens of books about heros and crooks, and learned much from both of their styles"
Pages: 1 [2] 3  All
 

Page created in 0.166 seconds with 24 queries.