Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2  All

Author Topic: Progressive Monotube Cartridge Solution and 444 Series Rears  (Read 5229 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BritGuy

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1000
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • BC

Progressive Monotube Cartridge Solution and 444 Series Rears
« on: January 29, 2015, 10:05:05 PM »

Just mulling over where my upgrade dollars should go for the start of the season. Ohlins get a good press hear for front and rear and having had them on a previous sport bike, I know that they are 'gold'. However, support seems a bit sketchy in my area of BC and of course, they don't come cheap.

Both the local independent and HD dealer speak highly of Progressive, my interest started trying to address some of the front fork dive on my 2014 RK. I ride solo and don't have any additional weight on the bike, mostly day rides, but a week tour traveling lite ever now and again.

Has anyone had the front and rear combination fitted on their 2014 tourer, if so what are your thoughts.

Thanks in advance.
Logged

greglyon

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1444
  • 2013 FLHRSE5
    • AZ


    • CVO1: FLHRSE5
    • Phillips and Lyon LLC
Re: Progressive Monotube Cartridge Solution and 444 Series Rears
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2015, 10:59:54 PM »

I am disappointed with the quality of the ride on the monotubes
Logged
"A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory"

SmokeyJoe

  • 2012 RGC CVO
  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 684
    • MS


    • CVO1: 2012 Road Glide
Re: Progressive Monotube Cartridge Solution and 444 Series Rears
« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2015, 12:34:13 AM »

I am disappointed with the quality of the ride on the monotubes
Many enjoy them, I was disappointed as well.
Logged
FuelMotos exhaust and tuning, Ohlins Front/Rear

BritGuy

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1000
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • BC

Re: Progressive Monotube Cartridge Solution and 444 Series Rears
« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2015, 07:22:29 PM »

Thanks for your views. I assume that this was just the monotone and not the shocks? Where they an improvement over stock, but not enough to justify the spend? Just a false economy if other manufacturers deliver a superior ride, but cost more.
Logged

FLSTFI Dave

  • IBA 69147
  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6718

    • CVO1: 2023 FLTRXSE Whiskey Neat
    • CVO2: 2021 RA1250S Pan America Special
    • CVO3: 2003 Fatboy, 95"quot, S&ampS 570 gear drive cam
Re: Progressive Monotube Cartridge Solution and 444 Series Rears
« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2015, 08:49:18 PM »

I liked the monotubes on my 09 Road glide, but the progressive 944 shocks were only ok.

The monotubes are also on my fatboy now. 

I am running Ohlin HD 159 on the back of the SERGU and love them.  Best shock I have used to date.

Thinking about doing them on the Rear of my SERK and doing the Ohlin front also.
Logged
2023 FLTRXSE Whiskey Neat
2021 RA1250S Pan America Special
2019 FLTRXSE Red Pepper / Magnetic Gray Traded
2018 FLTRXSE Gunship Gray  Traded
2017 FLHXSE  Starfire Black / Atomic Red  Traded
2015 FLTRUSE Abyss Blue / Crushed Saphire Traded
2013 FLHRSE5 Diamond Dust 117  Traded
2012 FLTRXSE White Gold Pearl / Starfire Black  Traded
2009 FLTRSE3 Silver/Titanium  Traded
2003 Fatboy, real fire paint set,

Puma

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 359
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • NJ


    • CVO1: 2014 FLHRSE Dragula 2, SESTP, C&C Fastback
Re: Progressive Monotube Cartridge Solution and 444 Series Rears
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2015, 08:56:44 PM »

Every time I see someone asking about suspension I recommend Race Tech.
Logged
2014 CVO Road King: Titianium/Black, Dragula 2 (2-1), SESTP, C&C Fastback

Puma

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 359
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • NJ


    • CVO1: 2014 FLHRSE Dragula 2, SESTP, C&C Fastback
Logged
2014 CVO Road King: Titianium/Black, Dragula 2 (2-1), SESTP, C&C Fastback

GregKhougaz

  • It's a Two Wheeled World.
  • Global Moderator
  • 5k CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9542
    • CA


    • CVO1: '22 BMW Grand America
    • CVO2: '18 Porsche C4 GTS
    • CVO3: '22 Porsche Macan GTS and my mountain bike.
Re: Progressive Monotube Cartridge Solution and 444 Series Rears
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2015, 01:42:41 PM »

I just got off the phone with a tech at Progressive Suspension.  Their monotube kit for the 2014 & 15 touring bikes should be ready for market by the end of next month.  Price between $440 and $490 US. 
Logged


"We've got some tall tales we love to tell.  They may not be true but we sure do remember them well." 
 Sawyer Brown

When you come to a fork in the road... take it!

BritGuy

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1000
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • BC

Re: Progressive Monotube Cartridge Solution and 444 Series Rears
« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2015, 08:34:15 PM »

Thanks Greg, had some good interaction with Racetech as well on both front and rear. Will wait to see what Progressive have, but Racetech tailor make rears to weight and riding style. Decisions.....
Logged

wicked110

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 42

    • CVO1: FXDWG3
    • CVO2: FXDSE2
    • CVO3: FLHRSE5
Re: Progressive Monotube Cartridge Solution and 444 Series Rears
« Reply #9 on: February 14, 2015, 01:35:01 AM »

I have that combo on my 13 cvo king.
They handle great but ride a little stiff. Mine are also 1 inch lower than stock.
Logged
2002 FXDWG3 103 big bore stroker, Ported heads, TW 55 cams, 48 mm Mik, Thunder Header 103 HP 105 TQ

2008 FXDSE2 12 to 1 comp, Moto Headz Racing ported heads Woods cams, HPI Tbody, RB Racing Pro Stock pipe. 142 HP 140 TQ

2013 FLHRSE5 10 inch Monkeys, Progressive 444 rear and Mono tubes

Puma

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 359
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • NJ


    • CVO1: 2014 FLHRSE Dragula 2, SESTP, C&C Fastback
Re: Progressive Monotube Cartridge Solution and 444 Series Rears
« Reply #10 on: February 15, 2015, 10:44:41 AM »

Thanks Greg, had some good interaction with Racetech as well on both front and rear. Will wait to see what Progressive have, but Racetech tailor make rears to weight and riding style. Decisions.....
I had an opportunity a few years ago to ride a friends Kawi Nomad for a few days. I had the Vulcan 1600 Classic that I added bags, lights, and backrest to, so they were really close to being the same bike. The biggest diff was I had the stock suspension and he had switched to Racetech shocks. I couldn't believe how much better his bike handled than mine. I would have switched mine, but I had other issues with the bike so I traded it for my first HD, a Heritage. Now I have a CVO Road King that came stock with the HD Premium Ride shocks. I like them, but if they ever go, I'll probably replace with Racetech. He also swore by their customer service.
Logged
2014 CVO Road King: Titianium/Black, Dragula 2 (2-1), SESTP, C&C Fastback

Fatboy

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1536
  • "Orange Crush" 94Hp / 119Tq
Re: Progressive Monotube Cartridge Solution and 444 Series Rears
« Reply #11 on: February 16, 2015, 08:58:30 PM »

I have a 2013 FLHTCUSE8 and have been running -1 mono-tubes and 944 in tandem and have been very happy with the results over stock.  :2vrolijk_21:

I haven't tried all the other options out there so I can't comment or give a true comparison but there seems to favorites for every group riders just like with cams.....   :drink:

BritGuy

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1000
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • BC

Re: Progressive Monotube Cartridge Solution and 444 Series Rears
« Reply #12 on: February 20, 2015, 06:30:16 PM »

Progressive have posted the new 2014/2015 Touring model monotone kit, but it does not fit the SERK. They have no immediate plans to produce one either. So it will be Racetech or heavier oil and see how that goes.
Logged

BritGuy

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1000
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • BC

Re: Progressive Monotube Cartridge Solution and 444 Series Rears
« Reply #13 on: March 15, 2015, 12:34:10 PM »

Well I had the 944 shocks fitted and heavier fork oil and I have to say I am very pleased with the results. Long sweeping corners now track very true, bumps are absorbed rather than throwing the bike off line and the lurch onto the front forks is far less pronounced. Are there better shocks out there, probably but at a price point and given the significant improvement over stock, this was money well spent.
Logged

GregKhougaz

  • It's a Two Wheeled World.
  • Global Moderator
  • 5k CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9542
    • CA


    • CVO1: '22 BMW Grand America
    • CVO2: '18 Porsche C4 GTS
    • CVO3: '22 Porsche Macan GTS and my mountain bike.
Re: Progressive Monotube Cartridge Solution and 444 Series Rears
« Reply #14 on: March 15, 2015, 12:50:27 PM »

Well I had the 944 shocks fitted and heavier fork oil and I have to say I am very pleased with the results. Long sweeping corners now track very true, bumps are absorbed rather than throwing the bike off line and the lurch onto the front forks is far less pronounced. Are there better shocks out there, probably but at a price point and given the significant improvement over stock, this was money well spent.

The more I ride my '15, the more I think that's correct.  I felt I was getting some front tire bounce.  Mechanic suggested dropping the front air pressure a couple of pounds from max.  It helped.   I would like the front end a bit stiffer so will likely try the fork oil solution.    :2vrolijk_21:
Logged


"We've got some tall tales we love to tell.  They may not be true but we sure do remember them well." 
 Sawyer Brown

When you come to a fork in the road... take it!
Pages: [1] 2  All
 

Page created in 0.164 seconds with 25 queries.