Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2 3  All

Author Topic: Michelin ComanderII rear tire  (Read 9028 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

2k

  • My ignorance is just as good as your knowledge, when my information changes, I alter my conclusions
  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7996
  • monter le cheval de fer (French)
    • NC


    • CVO1: 2013 SERK-Dressed in BLUE of course.
    • CVO2: 2002 Supercharged HD F150 512 RWHP
    • CVO3: 1956 BelAir Sports Coupe
Michelin ComanderII rear tire
« on: February 02, 2012, 08:40:20 PM »

Have read Indy tests on this tire and all claim 20K + miles. Never been able to get over 14K on my rear. Anybody tried one? They are on Amazon for $170 w/free ship. Almost bought, but want to make sure its not just hype. Inputs please. 180/65/16.
Logged
Most Honda Goldwing riders will blink when hit in the head  with a ball-peen hammer (sans helmet)

Twolanerider

  • 25K CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50582
  • EBCM #1.5 Emeritus DSP # ? Critter Gawker #?
    • MO


    • CVO1: 2000 Triple Red Screamin' Eagle Road Glide
    • CVO2: 2002 Candy Brandywine Screamin' Eagle Road King
    • CVO3: 1999 Arresting Red FXR2
Re: Michelin ComanderII rear tire
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2012, 08:44:07 PM »

The Commander II is new enough would be surprised if anyone has any longevity experience yet. 
Logged

Skillet

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3525

    • CVO1: 2011 FLHXSE2
    • CVO2: 2008 FLHR Road King
    • CVO3: 1980 FXB Sturgis
Re: Michelin ComanderII rear tire
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2012, 08:46:52 PM »

Never been able to get more than 7500 on a rear tire.
Logged

1sharprdkg

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4359

    • CVO1: 2009 FLHTCUSE4 Screamin' Eagle Ultra Classic
    • CVO2: Not CVO 2003 Road King Classic (Wife's) Sold her 99'RKC (Tinman)
Re: Michelin ComanderII rear tire
« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2012, 06:34:07 PM »

Go for it 2K be our test monkey!
Logged
" Life is Tough, Life is Tougher if Your Stupid"... John Wayne.

Limited Lou

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 281
  • 2008 FLHTCUI
Re: Michelin ComanderII rear tire
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2012, 07:59:09 AM »

I have read same stuff like you, It sounds like Michelin is trying to re-establish their reputation with the Motorcycle Touring world. Competing with Dunlop. I may give the tire a try when it's time. Like mentioned above it's too new yet..
Logged
2008 FLHTCUI
Olive Pearl/Vivid Black

SERK3

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1380

    • CVO1: 07 FLHRSE3
Re: Michelin ComanderII rear tire
« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2012, 09:14:15 AM »

If they are as good as what they have for 4 wheelers i'll run them.
Logged
07 SCREAMIN EAGLE ROAD KING, RAZOR RED WITH GOLD FLAMES
V&H DUALS WITH HI-OUTPUT SLIP-ONS, ZIPPERS THUNDER MAX w/AUTOTUNE, NESS BIG SUCKER, LED TURN AND BRAKE LIGHTS. FARING, HARD BAGS & KING TOUR PAK.
LIVE EASY, RIDE HARD

Tn.Heritage

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 85
Re: Michelin ComanderII rear tire
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2012, 12:07:09 PM »

I'm going to give them a shot when my metz croaks out. I have around 7000 mile on the 880 rear so I figure 2000 more tops and I'll become a commander II trial guy. :cucumber:
Logged
2019 Limited Low 114, S&S 475 cam, PR's, LC's, lifters,S&S Sidewinder 2-n-1 with a Roland Sands AC. Tuned with a PV tuner at J&B Performance.

grc

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14216
  • AKA Grouchy Old Fart
    • IN


    • CVO1: 2005 SEEG2
Re: Michelin ComanderII rear tire
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2012, 03:43:45 PM »

I suppose if you make the tread hard enough and dense enough and deep enough, 20k miles should be doable.  What we can't tell is if the dry traction is as good as the competition (they don't mention it in their sales pitch one way or the other).  The test results they hang their hats on aren't really independent, btw.  They were performed by someone other than Michelin, but they were performed under contract to Michelin.  That to me is not true independent testing.  

Anyhow, if they are as good as the claims say they are, they sound like something worth trying.  Especially if they will last that long and resist the cupping that seems to still plague the Dunlop's to some degree.  Go ahead and buy them, then do a coast to coast to coast to coast run so you can give us an unbiased and truly independent report.  ;D

Too bad they chose to make the sidewalls so ugly.  That is liable to keep some hard core Harley folks from trying them, since style is more important than function don't cha know.


Jerry
Logged
Jerry - 2005 Cherry SEEG  -  Member # 1155

H-D and me  -  a classic love / hate relationship.  Current score:  love 40, hate 50, bewildered 10.

2k

  • My ignorance is just as good as your knowledge, when my information changes, I alter my conclusions
  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7996
  • monter le cheval de fer (French)
    • NC


    • CVO1: 2013 SERK-Dressed in BLUE of course.
    • CVO2: 2002 Supercharged HD F150 512 RWHP
    • CVO3: 1956 BelAir Sports Coupe
Re: Michelin ComanderII rear tire
« Reply #8 on: February 07, 2012, 05:05:27 PM »

I never looked at it from there. If the Indy was under contract from Michelin......they would tend to say good things, if they ever want to test again!!
Logged
Most Honda Goldwing riders will blink when hit in the head  with a ball-peen hammer (sans helmet)

2006ULTRA

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 222
Re: Michelin ComanderII rear tire
« Reply #9 on: February 07, 2012, 05:41:46 PM »

We have an independent Harley mechanic in our area that is giving big discounts to people who try these tires.  Not sure all the specifics but my impression is that Michelin is pushing the tire pretty hard through their dealers.
Logged
2011 SESG
121rwhp and 124tq
Woods TW-9B cams
Ported Head
D&D FatCat Performance Baffle
Thundermax

32Lager

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 210

    • CVO1: 2009 SE Ultra
Re: Michelin ComanderII rear tire
« Reply #10 on: February 12, 2012, 12:29:48 PM »

I suppose if you make the tread hard enough and dense enough and deep enough, 20k miles should be doable.  What we can't tell is if the dry traction is as good as the competition (they don't mention it in their sales pitch one way or the other).   

Anyhow, if they are as good as the claims say they are, they sound like something worth trying.  Especially if they will last that long and resist the cupping that seems to still plague the Dunlop's.

Too bad they chose to make the sidewalls so ugly.  That is liable to keep some hard core Harley folks from trying them.

Jerry

I agree... I was planning to buy an American Elite rear this spring but these Michelin's are looking pretty interesting (except for the sidewalls). You can't help but think the Commander II's would have a hard compound to run 25,000 miles but does the new silica technology bring back the grip ?

Here's a few links I found this morning. I did an image search but couldn't find a good clear picture showing a straight-on look at the sidewall. It looks like they're using "raised grey" lettering.
http://blog.compacc.com/2011/08/michelin-commander-2-tires-preview/
http://www.webbikeworld.com/motorcycle-news/2012/michelin-commander-tires.htm
http://www.motorcycle-superstore.com/3/31/401/41873/ITEM/Michelin-Commander-II-Cruiser-Rear-Tire.aspx
Logged

LovemyCVOgirl

  • Four wheels move the body.... Two wheels move the soul.
  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3571
  • Give me a switchback any day!

    • CVO1: 2012 FLHXSE Ruby Red/Typhoon Maroon
    • CVO2: 2015 Toyota Tundra 4X4 SR5 TRD 5.7L V8
Re: Michelin ComanderII rear tire
« Reply #11 on: February 12, 2012, 12:44:21 PM »

My local Harley store actually had one of these tires on display.  I found the sidewall not to be ugly at all  :nixweiss:  It is a really great looking tire  :2vrolijk_21:  I will purchase this as replacement tires when I am ready for replacements.
Logged
Some days you're a bug, some days you're a windshield.

1sharprdkg

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4359

    • CVO1: 2009 FLHTCUSE4 Screamin' Eagle Ultra Classic
    • CVO2: Not CVO 2003 Road King Classic (Wife's) Sold her 99'RKC (Tinman)
Re: Michelin ComanderII rear tire
« Reply #12 on: February 12, 2012, 01:13:59 PM »

Never been a big fan of Michelin brand tires, car nor motorcycle. However the previously loved Chrysler Aspen SUV I bought last month has Michelin's on it and I have to say they ride, handle in wet and dry conditions very well. I know we can't compare SUV to bike tires but just saying I may have not given them a fair chance. When I need some new cycle tires I will consider these. Last tires I bought were Dunlop Elite 3's for the 03'RKC, they are doing fine.     
Logged
" Life is Tough, Life is Tougher if Your Stupid"... John Wayne.

JDOFLHRIDER

  • Vendor
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1126
  • 2010 FLHTCUSE5 BURNT AMBER -HOT CITRUS
Re: Michelin ComanderII rear tire
« Reply #13 on: February 29, 2012, 08:48:05 PM »

I offer discount on these vendor discounts.ride safe jdo
Logged

Twolanerider

  • 25K CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50582
  • EBCM #1.5 Emeritus DSP # ? Critter Gawker #?
    • MO


    • CVO1: 2000 Triple Red Screamin' Eagle Road Glide
    • CVO2: 2002 Candy Brandywine Screamin' Eagle Road King
    • CVO3: 1999 Arresting Red FXR2
Re: Michelin ComanderII rear tire
« Reply #14 on: February 29, 2012, 09:36:56 PM »

I offer discount on these vendor discounts.ride safe jdo

Don't need any yet.  Have used the old Commander on the SEEG and SERG though and have been satisfied enough to keep using them.  So for when the time comes what's an expected price? 130-16s front and rear.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  All
 

Page created in 0.223 seconds with 20 queries.