Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2  All

Author Topic: 124" big bore CVO from Rev Performance  (Read 5776 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Zinister

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 256

    • CVO1: 2009 FXSTSSE3
124" big bore CVO from Rev Performance
« on: September 14, 2011, 12:37:21 AM »

Logged

hogasm

  • Guest
Re: 124" big bore CVO from Rev Performance
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2011, 06:39:00 AM »

3
Logged

Heatwave

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1429
  • ‘10 CVO Ultra 120/127 & ‘17 CVO LTD 140/151

    • CVO1: 2017 CVO Limited (Garnet/Red) 128ci
    • CVO2: 2010 SE Ultra (Red/Slate)
Re: 124" big bore CVO from Rev Performance
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2011, 06:57:24 AM »

Has anyone built one yet?

http://www.revperf.com/TwinCam/twinCamPerformKits.html


Very interesting! Since I've already had the headwork, roller rockers, adj pushrods, larger injectors (5.3gm/sec), 58mm TB, Woods 408-6 cams and Power Vsion Tuner installed, the 124" jugs and pistons might be a nice fit for an upgrade.
Logged

Zinister

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 256

    • CVO1: 2009 FXSTSSE3
Re: 124" big bore CVO from Rev Performance
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2011, 09:53:49 AM »

Hogasm,

You have built 3?


Any thoughts on them they look impressive from the dynos on the same site.

Comparisons to the S&S 126 G2 motor?
Logged

SBB

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16404
  • Go fast or go home! EBCM member # 2.36 .01%
    • CVO2: 2011.5 SEUC
    • CVO3: 2012 SERG
Re: 124" big bore CVO from Rev Performance
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2011, 10:56:44 AM »

Hogasm,

You have built 3?


Any thoughts on them they look impressive from the dynos on the same site.

Comparisons to the S&S 126 G2 motor?


 ::)     ::)      ::)


 :vrolijk_11:

SBB
Logged

2012      SERG  "Nu Blue"
2018      Goldwing   
2003      HD Electra Glide Classic Silver and Black, of course!                
2 2012   Suzuki Burgmans
2018      Shelby GT350, 963 crank hp, 825 rear wheel hp

Dr.D

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1109

    • CVO1: 09 SEDFB Sunrise Yellow and Black Quartz
    • CVO2: 2014 CVO Limited silver/orange
    • CVO3: 2015 Indian Vintage Custom 57 Chevy Blue
Re: 124" big bore CVO from Rev Performance
« Reply #5 on: September 14, 2011, 11:01:56 AM »

Yes Hogasm waiting to hear all about them. What about longevity? Please include the ups and downs.
Logged

erniezap

  • Global Moderator
  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4900

    • CVO1: 2012 SEUC - Black/Orange
Re: 124" big bore CVO from Rev Performance
« Reply #6 on: September 14, 2011, 11:15:31 AM »

I had a RevPerf 124 as well.  Built it for 2 up cruising and mid-range torque.

The good:
The engine was everything that I wanted it to be.  Fast, could pull down a house, and was a lot of fun to ride!

The bad:
It would go through head gaskets about every 5K miles

I know that RevPerf and Cometics have been working together on a new head gasket and I believe that they have tested and are shipping the new design, so hopefully the head gasket issues are behind them.
Logged
2012 Black/Orange SEUC

hd-dude

  • Global Moderator
  • 5k CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6646
  • 2005 Cherry FLHTCSE2 "Obsession"

    • CVO1: 05 FLHTCSE2
    • Metal Dragon
Re: 124" big bore CVO from Rev Performance
« Reply #7 on: September 14, 2011, 12:52:55 PM »

I have done 3 of them, all three have had multiple head gasket failures. I just redid one of them with a new style head gasket from Cometic. Time will tell......

As far as power goes the best was 148.6HP, 144.8TQ This was with Revperf stage III heads and a TW9FG cam.

FAST380

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 801
    • CA


    • CVO1: FLHXSE2 . . . . . Fullsac X-Pipe - 2.25" baffles - Fueling 574 Cam's - TTS Tuner - 30 Tooth Pully W/Stock Belt- Wild One 575 Bars - Chrome Inner Primary - Kuryakyn Plate frame 9182 - Diamond Engineering Polished SS Bolt Kit - 8" Windvest - Black Agitator
Re: 124" big bore CVO from Rev Performance
« Reply #8 on: September 14, 2011, 03:24:24 PM »

Quote
148.6HP, 144.8TQ

There is no doubt I would hurt myself.....  :nixweiss:
Logged

SBB

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16404
  • Go fast or go home! EBCM member # 2.36 .01%
    • CVO2: 2011.5 SEUC
    • CVO3: 2012 SERG
Re: 124" big bore CVO from Rev Performance
« Reply #9 on: September 14, 2011, 03:26:00 PM »

There is no doubt I would hurt myself.....  :nixweiss:

Wouldn't take no where near that much for me to hurt myself.

 :(

SBB
Logged

2012      SERG  "Nu Blue"
2018      Goldwing   
2003      HD Electra Glide Classic Silver and Black, of course!                
2 2012   Suzuki Burgmans
2018      Shelby GT350, 963 crank hp, 825 rear wheel hp

Heatwave

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1429
  • ‘10 CVO Ultra 120/127 & ‘17 CVO LTD 140/151

    • CVO1: 2017 CVO Limited (Garnet/Red) 128ci
    • CVO2: 2010 SE Ultra (Red/Slate)
Re: 124" big bore CVO from Rev Performance
« Reply #10 on: September 14, 2011, 03:37:14 PM »

There is no doubt I would hurt myself.....  :nixweiss:

Nahhhhhh, but it sure would result in an expensive rear tire replacement bill!!!
Logged

hogasm

  • Guest
Re: 124" big bore CVO from Rev Performance
« Reply #11 on: September 14, 2011, 05:56:57 PM »

1st motor had 35k on it with a Screamin Eagle crank that was only ballanced. CP pistons, fueling oil pump and plate, T-Man 650g cams. No oil leaks

2nd motor has 15k on it with a Screamin eagle crank, balanced welded and Ultima rods. weisco pistons, fueling oil pump and plate, T-Man 625g cams, cylinders are from 1st motor and were re-Nickacelled and honed for Weisco pistons. No oil leaks

3rd motor has 17k on it with a stock 4" crank with custom rods, ceramic bearings, balanced and welded. Weisco pistons in 4.25" cylinders....same as 124" but smaller crank. HD oil pump and plate, T-Man 625chain drives custom ground down to new profile. No oil leaks

When I did the last 2 motors we assembled the bottom end and then honed down the surface to make sure the base gaskets layed on a smooth surface. Cometic has a special torque sequence that was done, and they were installed dry, but the motor was heated up to 145 degrees before torqueing  . This was something we did on the race car motors.

Zinster I can not comment on the S&S motor. Have never ridden one so I can not compare

Logged

hogasm

  • Guest
Re: 124" big bore CVO from Rev Performance
« Reply #12 on: September 14, 2011, 06:02:59 PM »

Very interesting! Since I've already had the headwork, roller rockers, adj pushrods, larger injectors (5.3gm/sec), 58mm TB, Woods 408-6 cams and Power Vsion Tuner installed, the 124" jugs and pistons might be a nice fit for an upgrade.

Just remember that once you go to the 4.25" cylinders your cases can not go any larger. With the 4.25" cylinders you don't leave much room for a base gasket to seal properly. It will seal properly if you take your time and get everything right. Do not just throw it together and hope for the best.

If I were to do it again, I would only go with 4.125" cylinders making a 117" with the 4.385" crank. At least with this combo you can go bigger later if you must.

Logged

HD Street Performance

  • Vendor
  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3118
Re: 124" big bore CVO from Rev Performance
« Reply #13 on: September 14, 2011, 09:08:07 PM »

I would use the RP cylinders in a heartbeat and the latest ones I have had experience with have worked well. I would not go 4.250 bore on stock cases.
Logged

hd-dude

  • Global Moderator
  • 5k CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6646
  • 2005 Cherry FLHTCSE2 "Obsession"

    • CVO1: 05 FLHTCSE2
    • Metal Dragon
Re: 124" big bore CVO from Rev Performance
« Reply #14 on: September 14, 2011, 09:12:01 PM »

I would use the RP cylinders in a heartbeat and the latest ones I have had experience with have worked well. I would not go 4.250 bore on stock cases.

I agree and continue to use thier products, just not the 4.25" bore stuff
Pages: [1] 2  All
 

Page created in 0.161 seconds with 24 queries.