Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[workingdan]

So I did a search and didn't come up with a whole lot of info. Is anyone using the woods tw222 cams?> whats your thoughts on it?? I just picked up my 2013 SEultra and I am going to do exhaust and a cam and tune. Thinking Jackpot 2/1 exhaust.

[HILLSIDECYCLE.COM]

While the 222 would "work", me thinks that the power, vs the existing 255, may not be a large increase/gain, for the dollar spent.
A better approach, FWIW, would be to cc/surface/equalize the combustion chamber volumes, setting the proper compression, and then install the Wood 777.
Now THAT, would get-r-done.
Scott

[Mr. Warlock]

While the 222 would "work", me thinks that the power, vs the existing 255, may not be a large increase/gain, for the dollar spent.
A better approach, FWIW, would be to cc/surface/equalize the combustion chamber volumes, setting the proper compression, and then install the Wood 777.
Now THAT, would get-r-done.
Scott

As we all know.......... there are plenty of options / ways to go WITHOUT pulling the heads, plenty of bolt-ins! It sure does get tiring reading almost every post of yours as a pump for business.

[SBB]

As we all know.......... there are plenty of options / ways to go WITHOUT pulling the heads, plenty of bolt-ins! It sure does get tiring reading almost every post of yours as a pump for business.

Fortunately we are entitled to our opinions and the right to express them. (within posting guidelines) I don't read Hillsides post as a pump for business.
I read his post above as giving those that are interested options. Of course if someone chooses to use Hillside then that is their business.
I have discussed a few things with Hillside and got solid info. Never got an invoice for those discussions either.
I suspect that as long as "rules of postings" are followed everyone here can express their opinion.
Mine is, thanks Scott, I didn't spend a dime at your place but do appreciate your help!

SBB

[HD Street Performance]

Jamie from Fuel Moto would be your best source for information. He has tested the cam with his pipes and likely in a 110.
I had great luck recomending the TW5 in the 110 but that was with a different pipe. That cam is new and there aren't a lot of examples of that in a 110 yet. It is a torquer but may pull a little more out the back chute than the SE255. If I was using that cam in the 110 I would not bother with headwork.

[Mr. Warlock]

Opinion, yup we are entitled to them......... I have expressed mine and now you have yours. I do not, however, see you jumping down anyones elses throat for posting the same type of post that I did. Enough with the thread jacking, if you have something to say to me, by all means get it out.... in a pm, as was stated a while back.

[Maladjusted]

Sheese Warlock... who shat in your Wheaties this morning.  Hillside is merely toting the benefits of headwork.  I don't see him sayin "My Headwork" or anything of that nature.

[HD Street Performance]

But the stock CVO heads move enough air as-is really with only the addition of pipes and a mild cam. JMHO
The main benefit of the heads off is to raise the CR. JMHO
It is about piston flow demand. The TW222 will be done in a motor this displacement at 5-5.2K despite the larger valve curtain and port area and heads that flow ~285cfm stock.
Add some lift, duration, and overlap and we are playing a whole new game.

[HILLSIDECYCLE.COM]

As we all know.......... there are plenty of options / ways to go WITHOUT pulling the heads, plenty of bolt-ins! It sure does get tiring reading almost every post of yours as a pump for business.

A local automotive machine shop, in his area, would be very capable of a cc/surface if in fact he opted for that suggestion.
I did not suggest he use us, but rather only information to help him, in his want for a power upgrade, that would maximize his hp gain, for dollar spent, as actually most of my posts reflect.
Mighty sorry if you misinterpreted my meaning.
Scott

[Jenady]

I had the Wood 222 installed along with Rinehart True Duals on my 2012 CVO Ultra. After 3100 miles I am very pleased with the package.

[workingdan]

To those that gave me feedback for what I was asking THANK YOU.
For those that jacked my post to just bitch, get a life. It seems every time I post something on here it gets jacked.Sometimes I wonder if its worth the hassle to get to the info from the people that do like to help other.

[Dan_Lockwood]

I had the Wood 222 installed along with Rinehart True Duals on my 2012 CVO Ultra. After 3100 miles I am very pleased with the package.

Those are some pretty good starting numbers. What had you done before the cam change to the 222?

Thanks.

[cherryseeg2]

I had the Wood 222 installed along with Rinehart True Duals on my 2012 CVO Ultra. After 3100 miles I am very pleased with the package.

Compared to the 255s how does it feel?  Notice any reduced heat?  That looks good for a bolt. Looks to me it should cool things down a bit with the added duration and overlap.

[cherryseeg2]

Fuelmoto has a dyno sheet posted also of the 222 in a 110.

[Jenady]

I had the work done before I took delivery so I have nothing to compare it to. No other changes were made except for a good tune after the install. My fuel mileage is in the low 30's with mostly 55-75 mph highway riding.