Topic: Re: Dyno Numbers (Read 68068 times)

RJ749 · « **Reply #90 on:** April 03, 2007, 11:14:39 AM »

Quote from: IronButt on March 31, 2007, 01:39:19 AM

That will be the cheapest Blow Job I ever got
I thought about heat taping my rear pipe also, any thoughts??

Doesn't that chit have fiberglass in it, seems like the ol' pipe might get some splinters during the BJ.

PHAZE · « **Reply #91 on:** April 03, 2007, 11:37:49 PM »

I changed the standard D&D muffler to the quiet baffle muffler. I've got the K&N high flow filter and SERT. The tuning was done by Brian Rose at Bumpus Memphis. The curve shows the original dyno chart from last August and the new curve (slightly lower) with the quiet baffle. The fact that the bike has another 5000 miles on it probably helped me stay up there with the quiet baffle (in Brian's opinion).

PHAZE · « **Reply #92 on:** April 03, 2007, 11:40:34 PM »

Sorry, but I failed to get the chart in the post. It ended up attached. Here's the chart. The red curves are from last August with standard baffle and the blue are the new curves with the quiet baffle.

PHAZE · « **Reply #93 on:** April 03, 2007, 11:42:52 PM »

OK, so maybe I goofed and posted the curves twice. I was pleased with the results and thought that everyone would want to see them twice.

UltraPolecat · « **Reply #94 on:** April 04, 2007, 05:33:12 AM »

Was absolutely worth a second look

Love them Fat Cats!

Viper · « **Reply #95 on:** April 15, 2007, 10:51:34 AM »

Just got these yesterday. I gave my compliments to the chef when I saw the curves. I called and gave them again after I rode it! Wow!

FLHTCUSE2 with Reinharts.

PHAZE · « **Reply #96 on:** April 15, 2007, 12:47:53 PM »

I know that the torque is really what you want and what you feel when you twist the throttle and the 110s are making great numbers. Has anybody got a simple explanation for why the 110s don't seem to be making more impressive horsepower numbers?

hard10 · « **Reply #97 on:** April 15, 2007, 05:24:39 PM »

I figured I'd put the numbers here to make it easier to find:

Here are the numbers: Run #4 TQ = 92.62, HP = 78.4 Run #8 TQ = 103.7, HP = 84.6.

Rhinharts TD, PC III, RYO

bikerdude · « **Reply #98 on:** April 23, 2007, 08:54:00 PM »

With Rinehart exhaust air cleaner and a Carl's speed shop cam and a power commander I am getting 99HP and 110 ft pounds of tk.

Sgt072 · « **Reply #99 on:** May 02, 2007, 12:06:53 AM »

Hey, Viper I just seen your sheet from Topeka Harley. I take mine in to Topeka Harley next week for 1k and Dyno Tune. I bought a Red/Black SECU2 from Topeka March. I currently have V&H Oval, Duals with PCIII. HD will putthe High flow air on next week, then I will put in on the Dyno.

07SEUC_KC · « **Reply #100 on:** May 03, 2007, 05:49:08 PM »

From Stock 78 HP 94 Torque to 90.6 to 102.4

RH Tru Duals, PCIII, SE Air. Looks like my head temps are down considerable also

HWYMAN1 · « **Reply #101 on:** May 04, 2007, 10:15:08 AM »

On one of the other thread on zipper 575 cams I had expressed concern on performance numbers achieved after install and dyno tuning,so not to bias anyone please review following sequence and tell what you think about the numbers, the dyno tune quality, etc.:First is done SERT, SE AC, V&H slip ons (Dealer) HP89 torque 93

HWYMAN1 · « **Reply #102 on:** May 04, 2007, 10:18:06 AM »

scenario 2:zippers 575, fueling oil pump etc. Doherty PP AC, V&H true duals with slips (same dealer)

HWYMAN1 · « **Reply #103 on:** May 04, 2007, 10:21:57 AM »

sorry lost attachment

HWYMAN1 · « **Reply #104 on:** May 04, 2007, 10:23:15 AM »

AF numbers for above

Author Topic: Re: Dyno Numbers (Read 68068 times)