Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 15

Author Topic: Milwaukee-Eight  (Read 61297 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Heatwave

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1429
  • ‘10 CVO Ultra 120/127 & ‘17 CVO LTD 140/151

    • CVO1: 2017 CVO Limited (Garnet/Red) 128ci
    • CVO2: 2010 SE Ultra (Red/Slate)
Re: Milwaukee-Eight
« Reply #30 on: August 25, 2016, 03:41:16 PM »

Here's the 114 to 117 upgrade chart from the P&A catalog

Logged

Rooster

  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5180
  • FLhtcuse2.ORG
Re: Milwaukee-Eight
« Reply #31 on: August 25, 2016, 03:58:55 PM »

So did they actually dyno tune one?
Logged

Heatwave

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1429
  • ‘10 CVO Ultra 120/127 & ‘17 CVO LTD 140/151

    • CVO1: 2017 CVO Limited (Garnet/Red) 128ci
    • CVO2: 2010 SE Ultra (Red/Slate)
Re: Milwaukee-Eight
« Reply #32 on: August 25, 2016, 04:06:53 PM »

So did they actually dyno tune one?

Based on the graph stating "Corrected Rear Wheel HP" I interpret that to mean the engine was dynoed and then they factor in all the losses across the drivetrain to calculate a theoretical HP to the ground at the rear wheel. Probably not exact but I'm guessing it will be pretty close to what well-calibrated dynos will start showing for the M8 bikes.
Logged

LC110

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 666
    • WI


    • CVO1: 2009 FLTRSE3 Stardust Silver / Titanium Dust 1of 1344
Re: Milwaukee-Eight
« Reply #33 on: August 25, 2016, 05:38:18 PM »

Logged
Spending time learning the science of the mechanisms of friction, lubrication, and wear of interacting surfaces that are in relative motion
Razorback Performance Built & Tuned 113@ 122.59 HP/139.30 TQ

Skipper

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 101

    • CVO1: FLHTCUSE-6
Re: Milwaukee-Eight
« Reply #34 on: August 25, 2016, 07:26:21 PM »

I applaud to MOCO. they managed again!
Of course there will be some problems with engine, or transmission, or clutch. The whole point is that, the "soul" still going on, "body" is just temporary thing, it comes and goes in different shapes. The day when they build "perfect" Harley-Davidson, the "soul" will gone. I've learned the lesson. I own a Harley-Davidson does not matter which one, it's a Harley and that is the whole point.
So MOCO keep going on the "soul" thing, I'm not interest for the "body"

Vladimir
Logged
"F..@* the Rushmore's, I'm gonna keep my Babe"

Heatwave

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1429
  • ‘10 CVO Ultra 120/127 & ‘17 CVO LTD 140/151

    • CVO1: 2017 CVO Limited (Garnet/Red) 128ci
    • CVO2: 2010 SE Ultra (Red/Slate)
Re: Milwaukee-Eight
« Reply #35 on: August 25, 2016, 09:38:23 PM »

Cycle Rama ran a stock 107 on their Dyno it is posted on their facebook page.
81 HP/ 99 TQ

https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14064303_10154413037268890_1775630127764030759_n.jpg?oh=a7632f21c78a67dc223dda4545899289&oe=5844314C

Almost exactly what the MoCo has for the 107 in the dyno charts from the P&A catalog  80hp/100ft-lbs. And the 114 looks like 89hp/110ft-bs at the rear wheel
« Last Edit: August 25, 2016, 09:40:55 PM by Heatwave »
Logged

kojak

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1242
Re: Milwaukee-Eight
« Reply #36 on: August 25, 2016, 09:40:30 PM »

From the source: ". So now we have one pushrod activating two valves. If you look at the classic design that has this configuration, they put in adjusters. They usually have low adjustment intervals, which are the cost of ownership and a pain in the butt to go in and have stuff done. What we did is that the hydraulic lifters for each pushrod now account for thermal roll from the engine. We have no adjustment. It’s factory set for life. We came up with an arrangement to set for very low lash at the factory and maintain that for the life of the motor."
I was told early on that one of the rocker tips has an adjuster. I sure don't see it in the pics?
I wonder if there is a lash cap on one or both of the valve stems? There has to be something to sync the
valves. No way the valve job is that tight. Lol..

SG
Logged
kojak
2022 CVO RGL
2022 Apex FLTRK Traded
2021 CVO Limited Bronze Armor Sold
2019 RGS Billiard Blue Traded
2017 CVO Limited Spiked Olive Traded
2016 CVO SG Stardust Traded
2013 CVO RG Atomic Orange Sold
2010 CVO SG Cobalt Sold
2007 CVO RK Blue Traded
2005 CVO EG Teal Traded
And some 20 other bikes over 45 years

RedMoon

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 233

    • CVO1: 2012 FLSTSE 3
    • CVO2: 2013 FXSBSE
Re: Milwaukee-Eight
« Reply #37 on: August 26, 2016, 07:33:40 AM »

Milwaukee-Eight engine 'inside the Factory H-D' video
Logged

TN

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2944
    • SC


    • CVO1: FLTRSE3
Re: Milwaukee-Eight
« Reply #38 on: August 26, 2016, 07:46:02 AM »

stage III upgrade info

Logged
Wut the hell was that maneuver

Heatwave

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1429
  • ‘10 CVO Ultra 120/127 & ‘17 CVO LTD 140/151

    • CVO1: 2017 CVO Limited (Garnet/Red) 128ci
    • CVO2: 2010 SE Ultra (Red/Slate)
Re: Milwaukee-Eight
« Reply #39 on: August 26, 2016, 07:55:48 AM »

Has anyone seen if HD has released a Screaming Eagle Pro Racing Catalog for 2017? I haven't seen one yet but they will have to provide one unless they intend to tell all their race customers they are on their own.
Logged

FLH91

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 435
    • MI


    • CVO1: 2015 FLTRUSE
    • CVO2: 2014 FLSTNSE
    • CVO3: 2013 FLTRXSE2
Re: Milwaukee-Eight
« Reply #40 on: August 26, 2016, 08:17:22 AM »

The HD website shows that the Torque of the 114 is 124 ft/lbs, and the 107 is 113 ft/lbs.
Logged

Heatwave

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1429
  • ‘10 CVO Ultra 120/127 & ‘17 CVO LTD 140/151

    • CVO1: 2017 CVO Limited (Garnet/Red) 128ci
    • CVO2: 2010 SE Ultra (Red/Slate)
Re: Milwaukee-Eight
« Reply #41 on: August 26, 2016, 08:22:37 AM »

The HD website shows that the Torque of the 114 is 124 ft/lbs, and the 107 is 113 ft/lbs.

I believe those numbers are at the crank, not the rear wheel. According to the MoCo P&A dyno charts the 107 is 100ft-lbs and the 114 is 110ft-lbs at the rear wheel.
Logged

sadunbar

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11416
  • EBCM # Stealth - SSBS # 1.1 - SoA # Z&E2525 .01%
    • IL


    • CVO1: 2007 FLHTCUSE2
    • CVO2: 2000 FXR4
Re: Milwaukee-Eight
« Reply #42 on: August 26, 2016, 09:17:13 AM »

Another thing that bothers me.  They could never even produce a lifter that could bear the strain of a single valve spring and now it's dealing with the strain of two springs? :nixweiss:

I am curious of the weight of two small valves vs. one large valve, and also the spring rate of the two current valve springs vs. the spring rate of the old design single valve spring.  But point taken...
Logged
2007 Screamin Eagle Ultra Classic - Light Candy Cherry and Black Ice
Screamin Eagle 120r
Revolution Performance EMS
Fuel Moto Jackpot headpipes and 4.5" Pro Touring Mufflers
HPI 55mm Throttle Body w/5.3 injectors
BDL clutch w/VPC92T
Traxxion AK-20
Legend Air Suspension
Brembo Brake Calipers/Rotors
Garmin Zumo
575 Chubby's
Bushtec Quantum

grc

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14216
  • AKA Grouchy Old Fart
    • IN


    • CVO1: 2005 SEEG2
Re: Milwaukee-Eight
« Reply #43 on: August 26, 2016, 09:25:48 AM »


One of the main benefits of four valve heads is that each valve can be much smaller and lighter and yet in tandem they flow much more than the old bigger single valve.  The lower mass allows lighter valve spring pressures.  Once the cam specs are available I'd expect to see less lift and less radical ramp speeds as well.

Jerry
Logged
Jerry - 2005 Cherry SEEG  -  Member # 1155

H-D and me  -  a classic love / hate relationship.  Current score:  love 40, hate 50, bewildered 10.

sadunbar

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11416
  • EBCM # Stealth - SSBS # 1.1 - SoA # Z&E2525 .01%
    • IL


    • CVO1: 2007 FLHTCUSE2
    • CVO2: 2000 FXR4
Re: Milwaukee-Eight
« Reply #44 on: August 26, 2016, 09:28:07 AM »

One of the main benefits of four valve heads is that each valve can be much smaller and lighter and yet in tandem they flow much more than the old bigger single valve.  The lower mass allows lighter valve spring pressures.  Once the cam specs are available I'd expect to see less lift and less radical ramp speeds as well.

Jerry

And subsequently less forces applied to lifters...


Logged
2007 Screamin Eagle Ultra Classic - Light Candy Cherry and Black Ice
Screamin Eagle 120r
Revolution Performance EMS
Fuel Moto Jackpot headpipes and 4.5" Pro Touring Mufflers
HPI 55mm Throttle Body w/5.3 injectors
BDL clutch w/VPC92T
Traxxion AK-20
Legend Air Suspension
Brembo Brake Calipers/Rotors
Garmin Zumo
575 Chubby's
Bushtec Quantum
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 15
 

Page created in 0.156 seconds with 21 queries.