Yeah, but part of the allure of a Harley is the link to the past.
That's crap and it's lazy on our part as a consumer. Self defeating on our part as a consumer actually. An "I want it so bad I'll hit myself in the toe with a hammer repeatedly just to keep enjoying the feeling" version of consumerism flies nowhere else. Chevrolet reintroduced a Camaro that harkens to its past and still managed effective modernity. Dodge did with Challenger and Ford has repetitively done it with Mustang. Those are much more varied and complicated systems than any little two cylinder, relatively non-accessorized and still less Federally managed (comparatively) motorcycle from Harley. Somewhere, somewhen, somehow and for some reason our obsession with potato-potato-potato has to stop being an excuse to let Mother Harley continually get away with design laziness and larceny.
I say thank goodness for the Federal standards or, in the current case, the even far more demanding European standards upcoming for each of the next two years. If Harley weren't forced by someone to modernize they would never consider their consumers reason enough to do it on their own. Since the consumers have, too often, been too damned dumb, satisfied, frightened, lazy or financially self-injurious to make Harley only now approach the middle 1990s in automotive technology thanks to the Feds and the Europeans for making them do it for us.
Yes, Harley will get it wrong before they get it right. Repeatedly. I doubt they'll ever be really "current" in my riding lifetime. But, if they survive, it's only thanks to the necessity of chasing regulatory standards that we're all still not riding some fourth generation Shovelhead (which, in a way, we still kind of are).