Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Shawrco]

Greetings,
Haven't posted in a while, caught up w/busyness. So much so I'm taking the bike to an Indy for cam & lifter change and to get the Fullsac DX pipes put on rather than do it myself. The cams are the Crusher (Kuryakin) TC24 (w/new bearings) and Wood directional lifters. Today I was telling the Indy which parts I have for the job, including a set of Fuel Moto quick adjustable push rods. He suggested keeping the stock push rods. My understanding was that cam change meant adjustable pushrods, partly due to base circle difference affecting the valve train geometry. After some searching on the net I think he isn't totally off base. Looks like part of the deal with the adjustable PRs is purely the convenience/time saving of not taking the top end apart. The TC24 is advertised as a "drop in" cam that doesn't require changing springs, etc., so the PR length difference is probably well within the capability of the lifter to take up. Bike is '15 CVO Road Glide @ 11k miles; only thing I've done so far is change out the baffles with the Fullsac ones I got with the pipes.
So, I'm just checking here with you sage mechanics to see what you think - reuse the stock or go with adjustable? The Indy's price was certainly very reasonable, even with taking the top end off. I guess I could get him to install the Rocker Lockers that I bought many months ago and have never put in!
Thanks in advance.

[J.D.]

Generally more labor reusing stock pushrods vs adjustables but both will work fine.

[grc]

Assuming (which is a bad thing to do most of the time) the base circle diameter is the same as or at least very close to the stock cam, running the stock single piece pushrods is fine.  As noted earlier, it adds to the labor cost compared to using adjustable rods.  Find out how much extra your guy is going to charge to pull the tank and rocker covers to reuse the stock pushrods.  Compare that to the price of the adjustable rods and see if it makes economic sense.

Jerry

[Yellow09SERG]

I'll look at my install sheet from the 24D's, but I am thinking the installation sheet tell you that adjustables are required.

[J.D.]

Yep if these new camshafts have a smaller base circle, and/or the stacked height to the rocker arms changes (e.g. thinner head gaskets) then possibly the stock pushrods aren't the way to go.  But if your mechanic does go this route then it is a good idea to install the rocker lockers at the same time.

[Shawrco]

Yep if these new camshafts have a smaller base circle, and/or the stacked height to the rocker arms changes (e.g. thinner head gaskets) then possibly the stock pushrods aren't the way to go.  But if your mechanic does go this route then it is a good idea to install the rocker lockers at the same time.

I'm searching for what is stock cams in 2015 110" engine... is it SE255? If I can find specs can compare with TC24. Just changing cams & exhaust, no head gaskets, etc., so it's mainly a labor difference.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

[J.D.]

A quick Google search would suggest these Crusher cams may in fact have a smaller than stock base circle diameter, which likely means stock pushrods won't be the best option.

[Shawrco]

A quick Google search would suggest these Crusher cams may in fact have a smaller than stock base circle diameter, which likely means stock pushrods won't be the best option.

I have both spec sheets but neither one gives base circle diameter. I'm not smart enough on cam technology to figure it out. Without the diameter given how does one infer the 24 has smaller circle than 255? Thanks

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

[J.D.]

There should be literature available on the camshafts from the manufacturer, or break out the precision measuring tools and do some simple math.

[Shawrco]

I have both spec sheets but neither one gives base circle diameter. I'm not smart enough on cam technology to figure it out. Without the diameter given how does one infer the 24 has smaller circle than 255? Thanks

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

I guess since the 24D has higher lift @TDC, that would mean the base circle has to be smaller?

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

[J.D.]

https://www.kuryakyn.com/products/4910/crusher-tc-24d-bolt-in-cams

[Yellow09SERG]

I have both spec sheets but neither one gives base circle diameter. I'm not smart enough on cam technology to figure it out. Without the diameter given how does one infer the 24 has smaller circle than 255? Thanks

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

Right below the cam specs shown on the 24D instruction sheet is a disclaimer say the use of adjustables is required. Thst is saying that the base circle is smaller than stock

[grc]

There is a third option for those who aren't big fans of heavy adjustable pushrods.  Harley sells what they call Perfect Fit one piece pushrods in longer than stock sizes to compensate for higher lift cams. 

Jerry

[Shawrco]

Right below the cam specs shown on the 24D instruction sheet is a disclaimer say the use of adjustables is required. Thst is saying that the base circle is smaller than stock

Thanks, correct. I read over the instructions in the box with the cams. All the aftermarket cams probably say that. To do it properly the correct measurements should be taken. Or use an adjustable for trial fit to measure and order fixed length. I've done this before myself and used adjustable PRs.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

[Shawrco]

There is a third option for those who aren't big fans of heavy adjustable pushrods.  Harley sells what they call Perfect Fit one piece pushrods in longer than stock sizes to compensate for higher lift cams. 

Jerry

Right, after taking all the measurements. Since the only things changing in this case are lifters and cams most folks would cut out the stock PRs and replace with the adjustable set. Indy is suggesting reusing stock PRs.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk