Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Twin Cam Tensioner  (Read 3465 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tazmun

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1080

    • CVO1: 06 FLHTCUSE (sold)
    • CVO2: 19 FLHXS All Black
Twin Cam Tensioner
« on: October 12, 2009, 02:23:30 PM »

  I know when they came out with the 96 cu/in they switched to a hydraulic tensioner.
My question is whats the cost of that part, compared th the spring tensioner.
I've had friends replace their 88/95/103's with the new one, and I've heard
of all different monies. I think if your having it done under warranty, you
should only pay for the cost difference between the two different parts,
or is there more labor costs involved?
Logged
The "TAZMUN"

grandpadoc

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4289

    • CVO1: 2000 SERG
Re: Twin Cam Tensioner
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2009, 02:39:16 PM »

  I know when they came out with the 96 cu/in they switched to a hydraulic tensioner.
My question is whats the cost of that part, compared th the spring tensioner.
I've had friends replace their 88/95/103's with the new one, and I've heard
of all different monies. I think if your having it done under warranty, you
should only pay for the cost difference between the two different parts,o
or is there more labor costs involved?


With the screaming eagle hydraulic kit, furgure about $1200.00 for parts and labor. In my opinion your better off going with gear drive like the S&S 510g kit...a little more money but then your done with it. 
Doc
Logged

porthole

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10767
  • Welcome to the Machine

    • CVO1: 2005.3217-45 FLHTCSE2
    • Porthole II
Re: Twin Cam Tensioner
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2009, 08:51:12 PM »

There is a little bit more involved then just the design of the tensioners.
Logged
:fireman: Duane  :fireman:


MV 2013

1982 LowRider * 1974 XLCH * 1972 Adnoh
You can't control the weather, only how you deal with it

Mr D

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1897
    • WI

Re: Twin Cam Tensioner
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2009, 08:54:34 PM »

There is a little bit more involved then just the design of the tensioners.

Is the over the counter SE kit different than what the Mo Co uses in the '07 and newer TC's ?
Logged
2014 FLHRSE6 Orange/Black
2012 FLHXSE3 Ruby/Typhoon [Sold]
2007 SEUC2 Red/Blk [Sold]
2006 SEUC Haze/Black [Sold]
2005 SEEG Yellow [Sold]
2003 VRSCA [Sold]
"I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me"
Phil 4:13

grc

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14216
  • AKA Grouchy Old Fart
    • IN


    • CVO1: 2005 SEEG2
Re: Twin Cam Tensioner
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2009, 09:21:09 PM »

  I know when they came out with the 96 cu/in they switched to a hydraulic tensioner.
My question is whats the cost of that part, compared th the spring tensioner.
I've had friends replace their 88/95/103's with the new one, and I've heard
of all different monies. I think if your having it done under warranty, you
should only pay for the cost difference between the two different parts,
or is there more labor costs involved?


If you convert to the new style, you have to also replace the cam plate, the chains, the oil pump, and the cams.  The new style cam plate isn't made for the ball/roller bearings of the old style cams.  The parts cost for the new plate, pump, tensioners, chains, and drive gear is around $440 retail if you go with the standard '07 and later parts.  If you go with the SE billet cam support plate instead of the regular production plate, add another $250 or so.  New conversion cams from folks like Andrews, Wood, etc. will run from $280 - $380.

btw, the kit that grandpadoc mentioned is something H-D came out with recently to add hydraulic tensioners to the '06 and earlier bikes without having to change the cams.  It is a new cam plate designed to work with the original cams, and it comes with the new higher volume oil pump and with hydraulic tensioners.  You only get the new roller chain on the outer chain, however.  The inner chain is still the old style to work with the stock cam sprockets. 
http://www.harley-davidson.com/gma/gma_product.jsp?PRODUCT%3C%3Eprd_id=845524448773018&FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=2534374302319517&ASSORTMENT%3C%3East_id=2534374302319517&bmUID=1255379611008&bmLocale=en_US

If you want the dealer to do the conversion under warranty, ask them to price the repair on paper all three ways; (A) - just replace the original parts with more of the same (make sure they include the chains and oil pump), (B) - change to the new production level parts with new cams, and then (C) - the new hybrid SE kit referenced above with your current cams.  The labor should be the same or very close, so the parts prices will be the real difference.  I would also have them replace the inner cam bearings with Torringtons as insurance against future cam bearing failure.

Jerry
Logged
Jerry - 2005 Cherry SEEG  -  Member # 1155

H-D and me  -  a classic love / hate relationship.  Current score:  love 40, hate 50, bewildered 10.

tazmun

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1080

    • CVO1: 06 FLHTCUSE (sold)
    • CVO2: 19 FLHXS All Black
Re: Twin Cam Tensioner
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2009, 09:29:20 AM »

If you convert to the new style, you have to also replace the cam plate, the chains, the oil pump, and the cams.  The new style cam plate isn't made for the ball/roller bearings of the old style cams.  The parts cost for the new plate, pump, tensioners, chains, and drive gear is around $440 retail if you go with the standard '07 and later parts.  If you go with the SE billet cam support plate instead of the regular production plate, add another $250 or so.  New conversion cams from folks like Andrews, Wood, etc. will run from $280 - $380.

btw, the kit that grandpadoc mentioned is something H-D came out with recently to add hydraulic tensioners to the '06 and earlier bikes without having to change the cams.  It is a new cam plate designed to work with the original cams, and it comes with the new higher volume oil pump and with hydraulic tensioners.  You only get the new roller chain on the outer chain, however.  The inner chain is still the old style to work with the stock cam sprockets. 
http://www.harley-davidson.com/gma/gma_product.jsp?PRODUCT%3C%3Eprd_id=845524448773018&FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=2534374302319517&ASSORTMENT%3C%3East_id=2534374302319517&bmUID=1255379611008&bmLocale=en_US

If you want the dealer to do the conversion under warranty, ask them to price the repair on paper all three ways; (A) - just replace the original parts with more of the same (make sure they include the chains and oil pump), (B) - change to the new production level parts with new cams, and then (C) - the new hybrid SE kit referenced above with your current cams.  The labor should be the same or very close, so the parts prices will be the real difference.  I would also have them replace the inner cam bearings with Torringtons as insurance against future cam bearing failure.

Jerry

Thanks for the good information Jerry.
Logged
The "TAZMUN"

grandpadoc

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4289

    • CVO1: 2000 SERG
Re: Twin Cam Tensioner
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2009, 12:40:09 PM »

...plus the bearing and seal kit your getting closer to the cost of a gear drive kit real quick. The new hydraulics still look like a crap shoot after 30K miles if you look at some of the more recent posts, so I'm not sure if thats the way to go. With the 510g you will have to get adjustable push rods, but other than that the heads, valve springs, pump, and cam plate all stay stock. You can feel a little more power especially when pulling a trailer with this set up also.
Loook at the S&S site for all the applications for your bike.

Doc
« Last Edit: October 13, 2009, 12:45:36 PM by grandpadoc »
Logged

Mr D

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1897
    • WI

Re: Twin Cam Tensioner
« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2009, 03:21:22 PM »

...plus the bearing and seal kit your getting closer to the cost of a gear drive kit real quick. The new hydraulics still look like a crap shoot after 30K miles if you look at some of the more recent posts, so I'm not sure if thats the way to go. With the 510g you will have to get adjustable push rods, but other than that the heads, valve springs, pump, and cam plate all stay stock. You can feel a little more power especially when pulling a trailer with this set up also.
Loook at the S&S site for all the applications for your bike.

Doc

How much gear noise is added vs. chain drive cams ?
Logged
2014 FLHRSE6 Orange/Black
2012 FLHXSE3 Ruby/Typhoon [Sold]
2007 SEUC2 Red/Blk [Sold]
2006 SEUC Haze/Black [Sold]
2005 SEEG Yellow [Sold]
2003 VRSCA [Sold]
"I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me"
Phil 4:13

hd-dude

  • Global Moderator
  • 5k CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6646
  • 2005 Cherry FLHTCSE2 "Obsession"

    • CVO1: 05 FLHTCSE2
    • Metal Dragon
Re: Twin Cam Tensioner
« Reply #8 on: October 13, 2009, 03:35:20 PM »

How much gear noise is added vs. chain drive cams ?

Depends on crank runout and gear lash. A true crank with the gear lash set up properly will have minimal added noise.

Mr D

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1897
    • WI

Re: Twin Cam Tensioner
« Reply #9 on: October 13, 2009, 06:21:51 PM »

Depends on crank runout and gear lash. A true crank with the gear lash set up properly will have minimal added noise.

Jim,

Is gear set up that much better than chain drive ?
Logged
2014 FLHRSE6 Orange/Black
2012 FLHXSE3 Ruby/Typhoon [Sold]
2007 SEUC2 Red/Blk [Sold]
2006 SEUC Haze/Black [Sold]
2005 SEEG Yellow [Sold]
2003 VRSCA [Sold]
"I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me"
Phil 4:13

tazmun

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1080

    • CVO1: 06 FLHTCUSE (sold)
    • CVO2: 19 FLHXS All Black
Re: Twin Cam Tensioner
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2009, 06:32:57 PM »

Depends on crank runout and gear lash. A true crank with the gear lash set up properly will have minimal added noise.

HD-DUDE,
 I'm probably only the omly one, but I'm into "basic stock". I've got friends with 124 cu/in S&S,
big Jim's etc, bikes are quick, get 30mpg or less and ALWAY"S have PROBLEMS. My friend with
the 124 S&S can do wheelies, with his Ultra, but it came unglued twice while on the road.
This is not what I'm into, I want to have some reliability. Most of the cranks, have runout
and your still taking a chance. I also have guys in our HOG chapter, that said "enough is enough"
And left their new bikes completely stock and love them. Yes, not as fast but much more reliable.
Logged
The "TAZMUN"

hd-dude

  • Global Moderator
  • 5k CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6646
  • 2005 Cherry FLHTCSE2 "Obsession"

    • CVO1: 05 FLHTCSE2
    • Metal Dragon
Re: Twin Cam Tensioner
« Reply #11 on: October 13, 2009, 07:04:33 PM »

Jim,

Is gear set up that much better than chain drive ?

Than the stock 99-06 tensioners? YES. No wear issues. The 07+ tensioner system has (so far) been stable and I have not had or seen issues with the wear. The best of both worlds in my opinion is to keep the chain drive and convert to the 07+ hydro setup. This way there are no concerns with crank runout.

Now if you are going into the bottom end of the motor then have the crank trued, welded, pluged, balanced and then runout will not be an issue.  The gears are better for the best performance and longevity When the crank can support it.

grandpadoc

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4289

    • CVO1: 2000 SERG
Re: Twin Cam Tensioner
« Reply #12 on: October 13, 2009, 08:21:35 PM »

How much gear noise is added vs. chain drive cams ?

It makes a very faint wine, but I can only hear it with the lowers on. There exhaust has a little more bark with sounds  :2vrolijk_21:.  Doc
Logged
 

Page created in 0.178 seconds with 22 queries.