Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Fullsac Performance]

I have been getting a lot of inquiries about low end TQ loss with the 2.5 baffles and the stock cat headpipe. We all know what big baffles do to the low end with a good non cat headpipe. Pretty much kill it. Having never tested with a stock cat headpipe other than baseline pulls on a stock bike. I just assumed the low end would suffer in some way even on a bone stock bike with huge 2.5 baffles. Was I ever wrong. In comes a good friend of mine with a brand new 2021 114 SGS. He just wanted noise and didn't care about power. Into the dyno room for a few base line pulls. Pulled the stock 114 mufflers installed the 2.5 baffles. A few more pulls later, man was I surprised! It actually gained low end Tq from the hit with an 8 FT pound gain in the mid range. AFR was right at 12.5 all the way through. Still learning! Lol..

steve@fullsac.com

[hogsty]

Verrrrrrry interesting.

Thanks for sharing that. 

[FLSTFI Dave]

Wow, that is quite interesting.  Nice gain in the mid range for a stock bike, no tune.

[Fullsac Performance]

Hey Dave!
Part of the gain was the AFR correcting its self. With the stock mufflers it was down in the low 11s. The big baffles leaned it out to a near perfect 12.5 at full throttle. First Harley I ever seen fix itself. Lol..

Steve

Wow, that is quite interesting.  Nice gain in the mid range for a stock bike, no tune.

[tlr]

Steve,

What about if I installed the 2.25's with your header but no tune? I think I know the answer, but since the TTS is out of stock is that a reasonable option.

[Fullsac Performance]

Steve,

What about if I installed the 2.25's with your header but no tune? I think I know the answer, but since the TTS is out of stock is that a reasonable option.

I would suggest the 2.0 baffles with out tuning just to be safe.

Steve