www.CVOHARLEY.com

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Dynamic balancer  (Read 1135 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

beechflyr

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 59

    • CVO1: Flhtcuse6
Dynamic balancer
« on: June 10, 2011, 01:03:36 PM »
'11 110 seems pretty smooth over
1400 RPM. Anyone have any experience
with dynamic balancers or see any need
at all?
Logged

spydglide

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11889
  • spyder-psychle
Re: Dynamic balancer
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2011, 07:19:47 PM »
On my EVO, which probably doesn't relate to a twincam 110 in any manner.  I couldn't tell that much difference on the EVO.  spyder
Logged
2004 FLHTCSE Cobalt 'Huckleberry'  .....94K+mi.     &  1994 FLSTN 'OleGranny' .....116K+mi.

AXIL

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2579
Re: Dynamic balancer
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2011, 07:31:24 PM »
snake oil...in my opinion
Logged
I CAME INTO THIS WORLD WITH NOTHING AND I GOT MOST OF IT LEFT  
AHH,MOONSHINE THE OTHER WHITE MEAT

spydglide

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11889
  • spyder-psychle
Re: Dynamic balancer
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2011, 07:38:52 PM »
Quote from: AXIL on June 11, 2011, 07:31:24 PM
snake oil...in my opinion
Yeah, AXIL, and  not only did I fall for that one but I got the electronic deer whistle mounted on Ole Grannie also. But, I was trying to do something about the buzz from that solid mount motor and  the damned critters that keep trying to kill me.  :o  I don't just look stupid...... ::)...  har.  spyder
Logged
2004 FLHTCSE Cobalt 'Huckleberry'  .....94K+mi.     &  1994 FLSTN 'OleGranny' .....116K+mi.

kansaskim47

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 117
Re: Dynamic balancer
« Reply #4 on: June 12, 2011, 04:22:26 PM »
 :coolblue: :coolblue:

Seemed to work well on the 84 FXSB (shovelhead Superglide), moved the buzz from 60 mph to 75 mph. Of course, that was a solid mount, I don't think you could detect any difference on a rubbermount or balanced motor.

 :coolblue:
Logged

grc

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14216
  • AKA Grouchy Old Fart
    • IN


    • CVO1: 2005 SEEG2
Re: Dynamic balancer
« Reply #5 on: June 12, 2011, 05:03:21 PM »
Quote from: AXIL on June 11, 2011, 07:31:24 PM
snake oil...in my opinion

 :2vrolijk_21:


Jerry
Logged
Jerry - 2005 Cherry SEEG  -  Member # 1155

H-D and me  -  a classic love / hate relationship.  Current score:  love 40, hate 50, bewildered 10.

Spiderman

  • aka Spiderman "guest"
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1302

    • CVO1: 2003 FLHRSEI2
    • CVO2: 2007 FLTR (faux CVO)
Re: Dynamic balancer
« Reply #6 on: June 12, 2011, 05:21:21 PM »
Are we talking about Balance Master's ? If so they do work and work well on a solid mount engine such as the Evo based softails and the earlier shovelheads. I've used both the clutch and comp sproket Balance Master's on rigid mount engines and am a big fan for that type of engine mount.  Waste of money on a rubber mount. You won't feel one bit of difference.

JMHO

B B

 PS  Contrary to Urban Legend, they do not come apart either.
Logged
 

Page created in 0.143 seconds with 21 queries.