Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: rinehart 2-1  (Read 1425 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

candybrandy-rk

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 58
  • FLHRSEI.ORG
rinehart 2-1
« on: July 30, 2006, 01:30:12 PM »

Who has tried the new rinehart 2-1 for touring?I am thinking of going to these or d and d fatcats
Logged
2002 candy brandywine.power commander III.arlen ness big sucker.thunder cones

Unbalanced

  • FUD Examiner
  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6708

    • CVO1: 2011 SESG,
    • CVO2: 2004 SEEG Pumpkin,
    • CVO3: 2002 Police Roadking, Maudie and Maybelle Slayer
Re: rinehart 2-1
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2006, 03:08:10 PM »

We have not seen enough of these on the dyno so far the ones that have been dyno'd gave so / so results.   If your after performance I would tell you to look at

in this order

Bassani 2 into 1  No falsie pipe
D&D Fat Cat 2 into 1 can be purchased with a falsie
Thunderheader 2 into 1 can be purchased with a falsie
Rinehart 2 into 1 no falsie available.

If your looking at quality of chrome / finish

D&D
Rinehart
Bassani
Thunder header

Loudness based on my lack of hearing

Thunderheader
Bassani
D&D / Rinehart about the same   Rinehart is a bit more throaty while the D&D is a different sound but equally as loud.

Hope this helps some.   I heard that Rinehart was working on a larger diameter pipe for big bore motors.

-harry
Logged
HBRR Florida Chapter,  STILL - The Fastest Chapter - Proven yet again Bikeweek 2017

SBB

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16404
  • Go fast or go home! EBCM member # 2.36 .01%
    • CVO2: 2011.5 SEUC
    • CVO3: 2012 SERG
Re: rinehart 2-1
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2006, 03:46:51 PM »

Harry

your quote,
"Hope this helps some.   I heard that Rinehart was working on a larger diameter pipe for big bore motors."
 


Is that rumor or will they have a new pipe?
Inquiring minds want to know!

 [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Logged

2012      SERG  "Nu Blue"
2018      Goldwing   
2003      HD Electra Glide Classic Silver and Black, of course!                
2 2012   Suzuki Burgmans
2018      Shelby GT350, 963 crank hp, 825 rear wheel hp

candybrandy-rk

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 58
  • FLHRSEI.ORG
Re: rinehart 2-1
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2006, 03:52:48 PM »

Harry, thanks for the input.It is very much appreciated! :)
Logged
2002 candy brandywine.power commander III.arlen ness big sucker.thunder cones

110tHunDer

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14319
Re: rinehart 2-1
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2006, 04:54:09 PM »


Quote
Who has tried the new rinehart 2-1 for touring?I am thinking of going to these or d and d fatcats

There's some interesting reading on the Rinehart 2-into-1 starting here: http://flhrsei.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?num=1144700310/284#284, and a photo of them installed on a SEEG on the following page in that thread.
« Last Edit: July 30, 2006, 04:54:51 PM by 103tHunDer »
Logged

Unbalanced

  • FUD Examiner
  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6708

    • CVO1: 2011 SESG,
    • CVO2: 2004 SEEG Pumpkin,
    • CVO3: 2002 Police Roadking, Maudie and Maybelle Slayer
Re: rinehart 2-1
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2006, 11:53:44 PM »

Chipper,

It was just information that was passed on to me.  It seems to make sense that they Gerald would want to have a pipe for the larger bore motors such as the 110 and higher :)

My best guess is that it is real only thing is it usually takes time to make it to a reseller such as BUB then be put into production.

/Fingers Crossed.

-harry

btw the jokes are sparse atm i think everyone went to sturgis or on vacation elsewhere.
Logged
HBRR Florida Chapter,  STILL - The Fastest Chapter - Proven yet again Bikeweek 2017

hd-dude

  • Global Moderator
  • 5k CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6646
  • 2005 Cherry FLHTCSE2 "Obsession"

    • CVO1: 05 FLHTCSE2
    • Metal Dragon
Re: rinehart 2-1
« Reply #6 on: July 31, 2006, 12:23:21 AM »

I finished up a bike build today and rode the bike for the first time today with the Reinhart 2-1. In the shop the pipe sounds really good. Very low mellow rumble. On the road  when you grab a handfull this pipe is LOUD! It sounds really good but very loud. This is on a 100" S&S Evo based engine in a Ness Softial chassis.

Street Stalker

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 99
  • All show and no go, but about to change
Re: rinehart 2-1
« Reply #7 on: August 02, 2006, 04:02:28 PM »

I bought one new and ran it on my 06 S.E. fatboy, took it off after a few days and sold it.  Was not impressed at all.  Hardly performed better than 2-2's.  I called tech at Bub, they recommended a pro-pipe map for fuel and they said another dyno guy had called after comparing it to a Python 2-1 on a 103" and it did not perform as well.  He said they were working on a quiet baffle first and then a performance baffle.  He said all of they're testing was on an 88".  Do some dyno research on the pipe before you choose.  The numbers the other member put up here on his touring was not all that impressive if you compare it to D&D's or Rineharts.
Logged

HUBBARD

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4082
  • FLHTCUSE7
    • WV

Re: rinehart 2-1
« Reply #8 on: August 02, 2006, 10:19:35 PM »

Quote
I bought one new and ran it on my 06 S.E. fatboy, took it off after a few days and sold it.
Logged
2012 FLHTCUSE7  (Electric Orange/Black)  Built Motor (124), D&D "Borzilla" Exhaust, Tilley/K&N Air Induction,
"National President"-"Hillbilly Rocket Riders", MC, Mother Chapter, WV
"National President"-"W.H.O.R.E", TPT, WV Chapter

CVOJOE

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2884
  • Life's a journey, why not enjoy the ride?
Re: rinehart 2-1
« Reply #9 on: August 03, 2006, 08:54:27 PM »

Here's what I received from the man (Gerry Rhinehart):

From:  "Gerald Rinehart" <Rinehartracing@charter.net>
Subject:  Re: New R5-2395CG FL 2-into-1's
Date:  Wednesday, July 05, 2006 9:12:13 AM  [View Source]    
 
Joe, I have had very good response on the 2 into 1 systems on 95 and 103 c.i. engines. The main diferrence between the true dual and the 2 into 1 is the true duals will have better top end H.P., and the 2 into 1 will have better bottom and mid range T.Q. than the true duals. Over all I have heard good response on the new  2 into 1 designs.

Thanks for buying our product!

Gerald Rinehart, President
Rinehart Racing, Inc
 
 
 
 
Logged
2003 FLHRSEI2. (Sold) :(

Horsepower is how fast you hit a wall.Torque is how far you will take the wall with you.

SneakyPete

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1608
  • AKA FGL
    • VA


    • CVO1: 2004 SEEG O/B- RIP
    • CVO2: 2009 SERG3 O/B
    • CVO3: 2014 SERK6 O/B
Re: rinehart 2-1
« Reply #10 on: August 04, 2006, 08:05:20 PM »

Quote
Here's what I received from the man (Gerry Rhinehart):

From:
« Last Edit: August 04, 2006, 08:17:16 PM by pete_4854 »
Logged
Member Hillbilly Rocket Riders MC, Virginia THE FASTEST CHAPTER!
 

Page created in 0.169 seconds with 21 queries.