I'm a firm believer in the idea that anyone can make a mistake. But in my book, when someone chooses to repeatedly drive drunk, that's not a simple and forgiveable "mistake". A two or three ton vehicle is a deadly weapon in the hands of a drunk or distracted driver, and I don't think we can just turn the other cheek or give them three strikes before they're "out".
Once all the facts are in there may be mitigating circumstances that might temper the punishment, but if the driver was in fact driving with a BAC three times the legal limit (pretty easy to determine with blood tests these days), and she has already been convicted of DUI on previous ocassions, I don't see where it's unreasonable for us to expect that she suffer major punishment. Part of the reason people don't respect the law, or think laws are only for the other guy, is the widespread lack of enforcement and meaningful punishment. I've read stories locally of folks who have had as many as six DUI's before finally killing someone, and they were still driving up and down the highways after getting nothing more than a slap on the wrist six times in a row. That kind of crap needs to stop, and the judges who keep looking the other way need to be held accountable. As far as I'm concerned, having some drunk run me down and kill me is no different than having some gang banger walk up and put a .45 caliber round in my head. I'd be dead either way, but only one of the guilty parties would be considered a murderer. BS.
Jerry