Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3  All

Author Topic: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?  (Read 17894 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

fourstar

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 294

    • CVO1: 09 FLHTCUSE4
    • CVO2: 04 FLSTCI
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #15 on: June 14, 2009, 11:19:53 AM »

I will be looking for some new baffles or mufflers now that I have my non-cat head pipe.  It sounds better but it is still too quiet.  This is why I would love to see the changes that were made to attain those power levels.  Does the example bike have a different backing plate and air cleaner, and what programmer and map is being used?

I haven't dyno'ed my '09, but I put the 1 3/4" Fullsac baffles in and I am very pleased with the sound.  A nice healthy bark but you can still hear the stereo and not offend people around you.  At about $120. shipped and about an hours work to install, you really should try them before you dump a bunch of money on some slip-ons. 
Logged
“Red! I want red, there's no substitute for red!”
                                                             -Sammy Hagar

GtreetSlide

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #16 on: June 14, 2009, 05:07:58 PM »

I will be looking for some new baffles or mufflers now that I have my non-cat head pipe.  It sounds better but it is still too quiet.  This is why I would love to see the changes that were made to attain those power levels.  Does the example bike have a different backing plate and air cleaner, and what programmer and map is being used?
Fullsac Base map installed with TTS Mastertune
 
Logged

Herko

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 80
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #17 on: June 14, 2009, 06:06:57 PM »

Steve,
You have a great product there with the CVO Baffles.
Below is a 2009CVO with 1.75 Fullsacs, Non-Cat Hd Pipe, ANBS, TTS Mastertune.
John
Logged

Fullsac Performance

  • Vendor
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1753
  • Never ride with a Halfsac! Insist on Fullsac Perf!
    • AZ

    • Fullsac Performance
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #18 on: June 15, 2009, 03:18:55 PM »

Steve,
You have a great product there with the CVO Baffles.
Below is a 2009CVO with 1.75 Fullsacs, Non-Cat Hd Pipe, ANBS, TTS Mastertune.
John
Thanks John!

Steve
Logged
Steve@fullsac.com  www.fullsac.com
Never argue with idiots. They will beat you with experience.

jabarr

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #19 on: June 15, 2009, 04:16:08 PM »

Steve,
You have a great product there with the CVO Baffles.
Below is a 2009CVO with 1.75 Fullsacs, Non-Cat Hd Pipe, ANBS, TTS Mastertune.
John

I'll ditto that!!!!!!!

Just tuned an 09 CVO with the 2" Fullsacs and ceramic coated non cat pipe with TTS.  95hp with 116 ft/lbs.  Graph is a duplicate of Herkos.  Best part is the lack of heat radiating from the pipes.  And they sound great to boot!!
Logged

DAW

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 49
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #20 on: June 15, 2009, 09:49:14 PM »

I just ordered a non cat header piper for my 09 SERG and plan on putting Fullsac baffles, interested in the Ceramic coating the header pipe, is it worth it? what cost should I expect? Do the inside and out?
Logged

hdctss

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 463
    • GA


    • CVO1: 2018 FLHTKSE Anniversary
    • CVO2: 2014 FLHTKSE, 2013 FLHTCUSE8 - both traded
    • CVO3: 2009 FLHTCUSE4, 2007 FLHTCUSE2 - both traded
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #21 on: June 15, 2009, 10:03:23 PM »

had mine done locally for 160 including the crossover pipe
Logged
2018 FLHTKSE Anniversary Odyssey Blue
2014 FLHTKSE Jupiter Blue and Wicked Sapphire with Dragontail Graphics (traded)
2013 FLHTCUSE8 Silver/Slate and Titanium (traded)
2009 FLHTCUSE4 Silver/Blue (traded)
2007 FLHTCUSE2 Candy Red (traded)

Diamondback

  • Diamondback
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1176
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #22 on: June 15, 2009, 10:21:40 PM »

 :drink: :drink:

mY non-cat stage 1 AC, rinehart slipons with quiet baffle material (works great), PC V with autotune generated 93hp and 111ft-lbs of torque at 88 degrees 65 % humidity.  Not bad.  Would like to check it on a cooler day less humod day.

 :coolblue: :coolblue:
Logged
2010 FXDFSE2 CVO Fat Bob, V&H staggers, Windshield, saddle bags, passenger back rest. 

2011 CVO Ultra Glide, Progressive Monotubes, Ultra 944's, Power Vision, ceramic headpipes, Cellset, Cee Baileys 15" and Fullsac 1.75"
Former 2009 SE Ultra, Rineharts, Stage I, PC V with autotune non cat header pipe
Former 2007 SE Ultra, D&D, Stage I, TMAT Metzlers
Former 2006 Dragonfly Ultra
Former 1999 Road King

CVOIRA

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 48

    • CVO1: 2010 FLHTCUSE5 - Scarlett Red Pearl & Dark Slate
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #23 on: June 14, 2011, 01:21:34 PM »

I have a 2010 CVO Ultra and was thinking about upgrading the exhaust system. I found this thread about fullsac's from a year ago. Can anyone chime in with opinions after riding for a while with the fullsac cvo stage 1 setup. I see the power benefits are just about the same for both cores. I am curious about the sound difference between the 1.75 and 2.0 muffler cores?  I am leaning towards the 1.75 core because I don't want the sound to get annoying on long trips. Your opinions would be greatly appreciated. tks
Logged

Midnight Rider

  • AKA: TCnBham
  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11107
  • FLHRSEI.ORG

    • CVO1: 2011 SERGU Rio Red (sold)
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #24 on: June 14, 2011, 03:14:28 PM »

I have a 2010 CVO Ultra and was thinking about upgrading the exhaust system. I found this thread about fullsac's from a year ago. Can anyone chime in with opinions after riding for a while with the fullsac cvo stage 1 setup. I see the power benefits are just about the same for both cores. I am curious about the sound difference between the 1.75 and 2.0 muffler cores?  I am leaning towards the 1.75 core because I don't want the sound to get annoying on long trips. Your opinions would be greatly appreciated. tks

I put the Fullsac X pipe and 2" cores, with TTS, on my 2011 SERGU and am very happy with the results.  Good sound, not too loud when cruising down the interstate at 80mph, but loud enough when you get on the throttle, for my tastes.  Sound is very subjective though, so what's right for me might not be for you.  I probably would have been fine with the 1.75" cores too...I'm way over loud pipes...been there, done that.  The nice thing about the Fullsac cores is that you can always change them out and sell the old ones without losing your azz in the process.  The 2" with the packing left in the mufflers is just about right...I would not want anything louder at this point in my life.
Logged
Sometimes it takes a whole tankful of fuel before you can think straight.
I had the right to remain silent, just not the ability...

Gone, but not forgotten...2011 FLTRUSE with
Fullsac X Pipe w/2" Baffles
Legend Air Ride Rear Shocks
Traxxion Dynamics AK-20 Front Suspension
Clearview GT13 Windshield
TTS Mastertune

GtreetSlide

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #25 on: June 14, 2011, 10:18:27 PM »

I used the 2" cores and very happy with them. Quiet enough when touring long distance, but loud enough that the moose and bears get off the road when they hear me coming. Well, except for one really big black bear day before yesterday. A guy in a pickup pulling a large trailer ran interference for me and it took him to blow the horn continuously while headed directly towards the bear. I slide by them on the outside (I think that bear wanted to munch on me)..

jb
Logged

Chuck Pryor

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 591
    • TN


    • CVO1: 09 SERG Silver/Titanium
    • CVO2: 86 FLST
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #26 on: June 14, 2011, 11:07:08 PM »

I just installed the 2.25 I don't think it's loud as the Rinehart's, but I don't know the performance value's. But by your numbers is 2.25 poor chose?

Trey

Trey,

I have been running the 2.25 cores for almost 2 years now... just put the 2.0 cores in this weekend for a change of pace. Trust me, you will NOT notice the difference. No bad choices here...

CAP
Logged

dave29

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 225
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #27 on: June 15, 2011, 10:26:32 AM »

I'm running the 1.75" on my 09 CVO. Just loud enough for me.
Logged

CVOIRA

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 48

    • CVO1: 2010 FLHTCUSE5 - Scarlett Red Pearl & Dark Slate
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #28 on: June 15, 2011, 10:32:33 PM »

I appreciate everyone's feedback it was very helpful. I am going with the 1.75 cores. Looking forward to waking her up. Very exciting!

Ira
Logged

Mogulbumm

  • Tiger Blood and Adonis DNA
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 49

    • CVO1: FLTRUSE
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #29 on: June 17, 2011, 11:33:15 AM »

Just added the Fullsac Stage I and II kits (1.75" cores, header pipe, and Andrews 54 cams) to my 2011 FLTRUSE and what a HUGE difference!  My local shop was impressed enough with the product, peformance, and service that he signed up with Fullsac as well.  Also changed to Torrington bearings at the same time (recommended by shop).

Was on the edge about the cams since they are almost the same size as the stock SE 255s, but the power curve is a bit different.  I LOVE the sound (nice deep grumble but not obnoxious like my Rinehart duals were) and the power is so much smoother than stock.

Heat was also dropped considerably around my right thigh without the cat present.

Dollar for dollar this has been the best upgrade I have done on any of my bikes and I can't see another bike without it.
Logged
2011 FLTRUSE CVO Rio Red
Fullsac Stage 1 and 2 on Order
Pages: 1 [2] 3  All
 

Page created in 0.176 seconds with 22 queries.