Yup, I think I remember reading somewhere that the first "peanut" tank came out in 1948 (not on that wikipedia page, however). But it wasn't on a Sportster, since those didn't exist at the time. So my question remains, why call this Sportster bobber a "48"? And in this modern day and age, who in their right mind wants a two gallon fuel tank? It might have been a great idea back when the engines were solid mounts and would buzz the fillings right out of your teeth so you needed to take a break every 30 miles, but the current rubber mounted bikes can actually be ridden for greater distances without permanent damage to your body. Just one more case of Harley doing nothing to attract the folks who want a capable and modern motorcycle. Spending maybe a week and a hundred bucks to "develop" one more retro styling exercise in a long line of do nothing styling exercises doesn't impress me. Sorry if I'm not easily led or fooled, MoCo.
Want to sell some Sportster's? Try putting some of Eric Buell's stuff on them, like his version of the Sporty engine that actually puts out some credible power, or some of his suspension ideas, or anything that is actually a functional improvement. Putting different clothes on a tired old hag doesn't make her more than a tired old hag. Thinking that the public is stupid enough to keep falling for this stuff is insulting. BTW, MoCo, if I wanted a stripped down bobber that looked like something thrown together in someone's back yard, I could do it myself for a lot less. Why don't you leave the "custom" stuff to the owners, and just work on improving the functionality, design, and quality of your product line? Make a Sportster that is actually competitive with the competition, like back in 1957.
Jerry