Certainly makes more sense However, I think it also depends on your gearing. The optimum shift point is where the hp in the next gear matches that of the current gear. Goal is to exploit the maximum total hp (not sure why it isn't torque now that I think about it) used.
Cheers
Well, I've always been of the mindset that it's torque, not HP, that produces acceleration. For the maximum acceleration
rate, I try to find the point at which the torque is at its peak and the point at which the torque starts falling faster than the HP is rising, and shift to keep the engine in that RPM range. I've been taught that's the way to get down the road the quickest. The flatter the torque curve is, the wider this RPM range is. If you have a peaky torque curve, then this ideal RPM range will be narrower. It's different on every bike of course... and the Butt-O-Meter is a very good judge of this. You can
feel when the power starts dropping off as the RPM rises into the stratosphere, and learn to upshift before it does. I ride it the way it FEELS the fastest. After all, that's why I bought this beast in the first place!
I haven't had the bike dynoed (yet), but the torque curve on this bike the way it's set up seems to be so flat, the engine pulls very strongly from about 2300-2400 RPM all the way to redline (and REALLY takes off at about 3000 RPM) - and seems quite happy at any RPM in that whole range! Very responsive engine that gets to 5000+ RPM very quickly... so quickly that it's a bit startling, actually. Sure a lot different than the old Evo! The duration on these 54H cams moves the torque range up some from the stock cams - but it seems to be very flat. If you don't mind turning some revs, these cams are a real kick in the pants!