Dewey your nominated
Harry I am
Don not Dewey
And in retrospect I have to say the MOCO must really have their critical thinking skills in order considering they have raised the bar beyond traditional philosophy (or lowered the depending on what seat you are in buyer or seller).
1. Build mediocre and they will come
2. Build mediocre and they will spend more with us to fix them, sometimes even on the initial purchase and we will call that "customizing" or "accessorizing". Roll add-ons into a finance purchase if possible
3. If in doubt on a new product release it anyway and beta test on the public
4. If a problem arises use every effort to patch the root cause or ignore issues that are not imminently dangerous
5. Train your dealers to browbeat customers into believing the issues with their bike are "normal" and weasel out of settling drivetrain issues whenever possible
6. Customer service moto: The answer is "NO" first then lets' talk about or negotiate a possible "YES"
The good:
I love every aspect of the style and the fit and finish is good.
The Bad:
The drivetrain, all inclusive
A poor support network
Things have changed considerably from the early 90s when the bikes were quality and you waited to get one. When the MOCO had issues they held back deliveries and went after the production system to improve efficiency and improve quality, a good thing for all.
Problem however is if a little is good then a lot more must be that much better. Fallacy!
The consumer lost on this iteration and here we sit. MOCO has record sales, higher profit per unit, lean manufacturing, and lower headcount (jobs) due to automation. Why change anything? A person smarter than me would buy their stock not their products.