Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]  All

Author Topic: Michelin Commanders.  (Read 7246 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JJAA

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 147
  • FLHRSE5 #629
Re: Michelin Commanders.
« Reply #15 on: August 18, 2014, 11:44:57 AM »

Rock soild on the '09 CUSE, 40lbs front & rear. Hope & wish that they start making them for the '13 SERK before I can see the air. Have never liked Doneflops.

 :oops: You do mean they are not available for 2013 SERK  :(

My dunlop are a PIA !
So much cupping than they whines at any angle but 90°

I am to change them (rear at least) next week, for 10.000 maintenance.

If no Commander what do you recommend ?
Logged

grc

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14216
  • AKA Grouchy Old Fart
    • IN


    • CVO1: 2005 SEEG2
Re: Michelin Commanders.
« Reply #16 on: August 18, 2014, 12:10:03 PM »

:oops: You do mean they are not available for 2013 SERK  :(

My dunlop are a PIA !
So much cupping than they whines at any angle but 90°

I am to change them (rear at least) next week, for 10.000 maintenance.

If no Commander what do you recommend ?

Which 2013 SERK do you have, the Anniversary or the regular model?  The reason I ask is that they come with different wheels and tires.  The regular SERK comes with the 19 inch front and 18 inch rear, while the Anniversary version comes with a 17 inch front and 16 inch rear.  There are other brands available for the 16 inch rims.

If you have the 18 inch rear rims, there is no acceptable substitute for that 180/55B18 tire.  We have beaten that subject to death around here since 2009, and nothing has changed recently.  You could always change the rims if you are adamantly opposed to using the D407 Dunflops I guess, but it's liable to be an expensive proposition unless you can find someone willing to pay a good price for your existing rims and tires.

Jerry
Logged
Jerry - 2005 Cherry SEEG  -  Member # 1155

H-D and me  -  a classic love / hate relationship.  Current score:  love 40, hate 50, bewildered 10.

JJAA

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 147
  • FLHRSE5 #629
Re: Michelin Commanders.
« Reply #17 on: August 18, 2014, 12:28:46 PM »

Hi Jerry,

It's an anniversary one.
So I should get the chance for more choice...

What do you think ?
Logged

JJAA

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 147
  • FLHRSE5 #629
Re: Michelin Commanders.
« Reply #18 on: August 18, 2014, 12:45:33 PM »

French FLHRSE5 Anniversary has D408F tires, front 130/60B19, rear 180/55B18

Can anyone suggest different tires ? Just a dispaired try...

:nixweiss:

Edit :
http://www.jpcycles.com/2013-harley-davidson-touring-road-king-cvo-anniversary-flhrse5/tires/bridgestone

Seems Bridgeston Exedra G850 could fit ?


« Last Edit: August 18, 2014, 01:05:16 PM by JJAA »
Logged

grc

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14216
  • AKA Grouchy Old Fart
    • IN


    • CVO1: 2005 SEEG2
Re: Michelin Commanders.
« Reply #19 on: August 18, 2014, 01:48:18 PM »

French FLHRSE5 Anniversary has D408F tires, front 130/60B19, rear 180/55B18

Can anyone suggest different tires ? Just a dispaired try...

:nixweiss:

Edit :
http://www.jpcycles.com/2013-harley-davidson-touring-road-king-cvo-anniversary-flhrse5/tires/bridgestone

Seems Bridgeston Exedra G850 could fit ?

I wasn't aware the Anniversary bikes shipped overseas were different than the US version when it came to wheels and tires.

Your original tire has an 80 (992 lb) load rating.  The Bridgestone you mentioned is a radial designed for lighter weight bikes, and it has a 74 (827 lb) load rating.  That is the same situation you will find with other brands that sell 180/55R18 rear tires.  None that I've found were designed for heavyweight touring bikes.

Jerry
Logged
Jerry - 2005 Cherry SEEG  -  Member # 1155

H-D and me  -  a classic love / hate relationship.  Current score:  love 40, hate 50, bewildered 10.

JJAA

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 147
  • FLHRSE5 #629
Re: Michelin Commanders.
« Reply #20 on: August 23, 2014, 12:12:36 PM »

Jerry,

The load rating difference is equal to passenger weight...
I have none.
Are there any other reason going with Bridgeston would be risky ?

Jean-Jacques
Logged

grc

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14216
  • AKA Grouchy Old Fart
    • IN


    • CVO1: 2005 SEEG2
Re: Michelin Commanders.
« Reply #21 on: August 23, 2014, 02:22:07 PM »


That's a decision only you can make Jean-Jacques.  Some people have installed similar tires with a 74 load rating and claim no problems.  The fallacy about using those claims to justify doing it yourself is that you are only going to hear from the people who claim they have no problems, if you follow what I'm saying.

The bike, or a car for that matter, is designed with a maximum weight rating that includes passengers, luggage, etc. that is called the GVWR, or gross vehicle weight rating.  The tires are then specified to meet or exceed what is required to support that GVWR.  In most cases there is a safety margin added because the manufacturers know that many people ignore the GVWR and overload their bikes or cars or trucks.  You may say to yourself, well I only weigh 150 pounds and I never carry a passenger or luggage other than a jacket, so I don't need to worry about using the tire specified by the manufacturer.  If you're willing to take that chance, it's not up to me or anyone else to tell you that you can't do that.  I just point out in these threads what the manufacturer and tire company say is the minimum load rating they recommend.  I've also been known to point out that the use of tires rated lower than what's required will also leave the owner of the bike on the hook if something bad does happen.  The manufacturer and tire company won't be liable.

Anyhow, like I said, it's a decision I can't make for you.  You may find that the tire designed for a lighter sport bike also won't wear as well as the tire designed for a heavyweight touring bike, and it may not be a great match with the stock front tire in terms of cornering grip, etc..  There is a lot involved in specifying tires other than just what will fit in the opening and on the rim.  That's why they pay engineers to make those determinations and don't leave it up to just anyone.

Jerry
Logged
Jerry - 2005 Cherry SEEG  -  Member # 1155

H-D and me  -  a classic love / hate relationship.  Current score:  love 40, hate 50, bewildered 10.

2k

  • My ignorance is just as good as your knowledge, when my information changes, I alter my conclusions
  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7988
  • monter le cheval de fer (French)
    • NC


    • CVO1: 2013 SERK-Dressed in BLUE of course.
    • CVO2: 2002 Supercharged HD F150 512 RWHP
    • CVO3: 1956 BelAir Sports Coupe
Re: Michelin Commanders.
« Reply #22 on: August 23, 2014, 05:43:38 PM »

I am currently runnin a 180/55 18 Metzeler on the back of my '13 SERK non-Anni with no problems. Never have a BSR as when she turned 70, she said thats it for me. At 68, I refuse to quit and just completed a 8 day 2800+ mile Canadian Rockies ride on that tire. I will stop short of recommending you run that tire because like Jerry said, if I had experienced a problem my death might have prevented me from posting it. Only you know your riding requirements & style.
Logged
Most Honda Goldwing riders will blink when hit in the head  with a ball-peen hammer (sans helmet)

RGKen

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 75

    • CVO1: 2012 FLTRXSE Skunk
Re: Michelin Commanders.
« Reply #23 on: August 23, 2014, 06:28:45 PM »

How many miles on your bike?  Could be your swing arm bushings. 
Logged

JJAA

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 147
  • FLHRSE5 #629
Re: Michelin Commanders.
« Reply #24 on: August 23, 2014, 07:06:33 PM »

Your help makes me cool, calm collected ! As much as possible...
Some kind of pre-Rushmore effect :huepfenlol2:

I'm going to 10 000 miles visit on Tuesday morning.

Thought of new other tires. You helped me change my mind.
I'll ask they check everything and will go with a brand new collector unique Dunlop : one more year to think about any another choice...

Jean-Jacques
« Last Edit: August 23, 2014, 07:47:25 PM by JJAA »
Logged

ltank

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1214
    • LA

    • CVO1: 2000 FXR4 S&S V111, CustomS.S. 2-1 exhaust, Primo-Rivera OD 6 speed, 49mm Custom Front End Ohlins 30mm Fork cartridges , Hyperpro Shocks, Barnett Scorpian Clutch
    • CVO2: 1983 88" Shovelhead Won the World of Wheels 1985 Sept 85 Issue of Hot Bike Mag
    • CVO3: 1989 FXRS, 1990 Custom 100" Shovelhead/ EVO
Re: Michelin Commanders.
« Reply #25 on: September 08, 2014, 05:45:28 PM »

I just ordered my second Commander 2 Rear tire. I got about 13000 out of the rear and got over 18000 on front. No issues at all. Dunlop 402 rear I an lucky to get 8000 miles. Bike tires don't have the deep tread or hardness of automotive tires. Bike tires are lighter for faster acceleration and more flexible for grip in the turns.
Logged

FlaHeatWave

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2208

    • CVO1: '01 FXDWG2 RED 103 6sp
    • CVO2: '05 FLHTCSE2 CHERRY
    • CVO3: '09 FLTRSE3 YELLOW 117/DD7
Re: Michelin Commanders.
« Reply #26 on: September 08, 2014, 06:10:13 PM »

'Just noticed that the Commander IIs on the '05 SEEG have 8k on them and still look brand new!!
Logged
"I've read dozens of books about heros and crooks, and learned much from both of their styles"
Pages: 1 [2]  All
 

Page created in 0.156 seconds with 21 queries.