Apples versus oranges. Harley's numbers are at the crankshaft, and on the '07 and later designs those numbers are about 18-20% higher than what you will get at the rear wheel due to the rather inefficient primary and final drive system. Thus the 115 claimed ft-lbs of the CVO110's translated to approximately 95 ft-lbs at the rear wheel. If you assume the same efficiency ratio with the latest claim of 122 ft-lbs at the crank, you'd be looking at approximately 101 ft-lbs at the rear wheel. Not exactly major mod territory.
I wouldn't put much credence in that latest number btw. If you look at the numbers they've been claiming on the CVO110 bikes for several years now, they made no differentiation between the Ultra models with the old full airbox type air cleaner and the SG / RG / RK models with a real high flow air cleaner. In other words, the numbers they list aren't terribly accurate, and they in fact have a footnote stating that the numbers will vary.
If you look at the current spec pages on the H-D web site today for the 2012 CUSE, you will see that the torque figures for that bike are listed at 0 ft-lbs @ 0 rpm. While that is an accurate number, it's not what should be listed on the spec page. So much for attention to detail on the spec sheets and brochures.
Jerry