BB, really not at all negative on the concept of more fuel. Anything that enhances any of the various safety margins I'm all in for. We don't know what the tank will look like yet. But if it's only a true half gallon larger I don't expect any dramatic difference.
I suppose if I were to consider the new tank in any "negative" light it would only be a relative one. By that I mean that relative to adding a bit more fuel I think their engineering efforts could have gone toward ABS or a few other safety or comfort measures to greater overall good than would be a bit more fuel. But taken as a stand alone consideration a bigger tank is a bigger tank. That's a plus. It it ain't butt ugly and keeps me from running out of gas just one time that's a definite win.
I'll agree with you there, Don. A bigger tank may not be such a bad idea. Case in point, when I was on my way to meet you guys last week, I was rolling down I40. There is a long stretch without any gas stations on the exits. Rather, one has to get off the beaten path and really look. My fuel ight was on, and yes, I know, that's my own damn fault for not stopping earlier, but at that point, it is what it is. I stopped at a small country store somewhere just east of Little Rock and asked where the nearest gas station was. Turns out it was 4 miles down US70. By the time I got there, my engine was sputtering. Had I had a bigger tank, I wouldn't have been sputtering, but knowing me, I'd have pushed it to the limit anyway. I also agree with you about funds released for R&D in other areas such as getting rid of the chain driven cams. The chains are the weak link in an otherwise bullet proof engine. Gears are so much more reliable, they have more accurate timing, and they sound cool as hell at idle. Can't wait to get mine. Note, there is no "s" on the end of the word "mine." If there is, I hope I'm not in the middle of the mine field!