The law was written in such a way that a local judge has no authority to disregard the "punitive fee", as they call it. When a violation that is within those set forth by this legislation, and the violator has any sort of past record of similar violations, he will receive the appropriate fine and then the mandatory fee - and they have set up a payment plan with interest for these fees to be paid. Not sure whether that is a disregard for the local judges' intellectual abilities to make a judgment by the legislators, or that it is mandatory that these fees are awarded so that a lawyer will be retained to fight the case. That is not a cheap way either - and is my contention that this was the reason for the legislation to start with. And, it was unconstitutional then.
What does a socialist system do when its subjects commit less punishable crimes? Increase the penalty for lessor 'crimes' and make crimes out of otherwise misjudgments by its subjects. That makes a socialistic system appear to be keeping order for those who fee the need for protection from those criminals, which is all of us at any time. We are building more jails and prisons at a rapidly increasing rate and the US society is oblivious to what this really means.... They are next!
I'm sorry that I'm an old man with harsh convictions, but I'm glad that I don't have to watch the US go into the period of anarchy and lawlessness that is coming. It is more likely than 'global warming' to rid the world of a majority of its population.
Again, it's just a rant, but one that more and more people are concluding.
Happy days!
BC