Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Original tune AFR vs Stock improved?  (Read 694 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Jordan1200

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 97
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • ON

Original tune AFR vs Stock improved?
« on: January 27, 2020, 03:53:15 PM »

I was looking at the AFR settings between the original and the stock improved and was surprised to see that the stock AFR settings in the 3750 rpm to 4000 rpm ranges was actually richer on my stock ECU calibration and wanted some input from others with more powervision experience than me. I have attached a pdf file of the two AFR settings.
thinking the stock improved would be better on gas mileage but the stock one would run cooler. Any other thoughts on why the stock one seems to be richer? Even at 14.0 in some areas where the stock improved is 14.4 across the board... I assume the bike would be in open loop mode at 14.0 and below? On a similar note, what is the lowest AFR that allows closed loop operation with narrow band AFR's?
When a map is set to an AFR outside the closed loop capability of the narrow band system, who does the system handle it and is that a good way to have it setup?
Just trying to learn from those that know more about this stuff because I am a newb at EFI.
Any advise welcomed and thanks...
Logged
2010 Street Glide 96" (Canadian edition)
S&S 106 Big Bore
Stage 2 ACR Heads
Fueling Oil Pump
Fueling Cam plate and
Fueling 543 Gear Drive cams
Supertrapp Supermeg 2 into 1 Exhaust
 

Page created in 0.12 seconds with 24 queries.