Ladies and Gentlemen of CVO. Regarding the thread he has started here Fatboy has asked the moderators if we would request of users to limit a bit the extraneous chatter in this thread that we are all so prone to drop in during the conversations. Fatboy is very interested in what the options are and would really like to narrow the focus down here to SEEG options, work that has been done, what the expenses might be, and how productive things have been.
Have read through the thread and it's actually surprisingly good (compared to most of our threads) for staying on topic. It does, however, have the few drop-ins. A response, and a response to a response that have no relavence at all to the questions Fatboy asked of us. One of these responses is in fact my own.
In light of our fellow user's request here I'm going to quickly scan back through the thread and remove my post that didn't specifically respond to the questions asked at the beginning. As a gesture of courtesy to Fatboy and his thread I'd asked each of the rest of you to quickly scan back through and see if you too have a post that merely converses but doesn't respond to his original question. If you do have such a post or posts please consider removing them as I did mine.
It was Fatboy's question after all. It is important to him. There are certainly any number of other threads where we might and will banter and chatter without intruding on a valuable topic that is contempary and important to one of our users.
Lastly let me just point out the obvious. If you do find something that is just conversation, doesn't specifically answer the gentleman's questions, and that you deem ok to remove; you don't then need to defeat the purpose of the removal by writing a new post saying that you've done so [smiley=7.gif]
Thanks everyone,
Don