Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2  All

Author Topic: SE  Ultra/  Couple of obversations  (Read 6038 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GC_Super

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 961
  • Great Ride!
SE  Ultra/  Couple of obversations
« on: September 05, 2005, 03:25:13 PM »

Was looking thru some literature last nite and a couple of things caught my eye. One is the weight of the bike. It weighs in at a whopping 845 lbs,  57 lbs more than a standard Ultra.  All that bling bling is heavy.

Second, on page 51 of the screaming eagle catalog, they list all the cam specs, including the 253, which they used to keep secret for some reason.  When you see that cam compared to all the others, I can see why they kept it a secret.  LOL  What really stands out was the intake opening at  7 deg BTDC.  Also the duration is the longest of all their cams. No other cam is even close to single digits. Also on the right side of the page where they describe each cam, there is no mention of the 253.  For comparisons sake, I wish they would list the stock 88 cam just to see how they compare.  I assume the difference in the CVO cam is EPA mandated.
Logged
2006 SEUltra ordered, born on Feb 10, recieved Feb, 28, 2006

GC_Super

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 961
  • Great Ride!
Re: SE
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2005, 03:27:30 PM »

How about observations?  [smiley=oops.gif]
Logged
2006 SEUltra ordered, born on Feb 10, recieved Feb, 28, 2006

grc

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14216
  • AKA Grouchy Old Fart
    • IN


    • CVO1: 2005 SEEG2
Re: SE
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2005, 06:52:14 PM »

Quote
Was looking thru some literature last nite and a couple of things caught my eye. One is the weight of the bike. It weighs in at a whopping 845 lbs,
Logged
Jerry - 2005 Cherry SEEG  -  Member # 1155

H-D and me  -  a classic love / hate relationship.  Current score:  love 40, hate 50, bewildered 10.

GC_Super

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 961
  • Great Ride!
Re: SE
« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2005, 07:18:55 PM »

Thanks GRC, just checked it out.  The timing number is equally low, -02 for carb, +02 for efi.  Again, I'm sure the EPA makes the cams hard to build for power, although the stock 88 cams have always been pretty good for low end torque.  I'm still thinking the TW26 would be a pretty good choice for a bolt in to lower the power band with stock comp. Only cost a few hundred to find out.  [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Logged
2006 SEUltra ordered, born on Feb 10, recieved Feb, 28, 2006

Twolanerider

  • 25K CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50545
  • EBCM #1.5 Emeritus DSP # ? Critter Gawker #?
    • MO


    • CVO1: 2000 Triple Red Screamin' Eagle Road Glide
    • CVO2: 2002 Candy Brandywine Screamin' Eagle Road King
    • CVO3: 1999 Arresting Red FXR2
Re: SE
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2005, 01:01:08 AM »

Quote
Was looking thru some literature last nite and a couple of things caught my eye. One is the weight of the bike. It weighs in at a whopping 845 lbs,
Logged

displacing air

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 922
  • I am glad God answers no sometimes!
Re: SE
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2005, 08:47:24 AM »

The lid of the tour pak could be ten pounds heavier by itself...at least it feals it.
Logged
2006 SEUC ...Watermelon Flavor!

GC_Super

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 961
  • Great Ride!
Re: SE
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2005, 08:58:27 AM »

Of all the places to add weight, the tour pack would be the worst. HD tour packs stick out like a sore thumb as it is, plus I usually put a small cooler or travel bag on the rack when traveling.
Logged
2006 SEUltra ordered, born on Feb 10, recieved Feb, 28, 2006

Twolanerider

  • 25K CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50545
  • EBCM #1.5 Emeritus DSP # ? Critter Gawker #?
    • MO


    • CVO1: 2000 Triple Red Screamin' Eagle Road Glide
    • CVO2: 2002 Candy Brandywine Screamin' Eagle Road King
    • CVO3: 1999 Arresting Red FXR2
Re: SE
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2005, 11:36:43 AM »

Quote
Of all the places to add weight, the tour pack would be the worst. HD tour packs stick out like a sore thumb as it is, plus I usually put a small cooler or travel bag on the rack when traveling.



Have had the same thought myself GC.  Adding weight both high and behind the rear axle is about the worst place we could possibly put it.  In fact I tell myself that everytime I load up the tour pak just because it's easier to get to than the saddlebags  [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Logged

110tHunDer

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14319
Re: SE
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2005, 12:20:36 PM »

I agree, but they did lower the regular tour-paks an inch or so for 2006 which will help with the center of gravity.  I assume the leather CVO tour-pak is similarly designed.
Logged

FR8TRN

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1355
  • Ya ever take a crap so big your pants fit better??
Re: SE
« Reply #9 on: September 15, 2005, 08:22:49 PM »

Quote
Of all the places to add weight, the tour pack would be the worst. HD tour packs stick out like a sore thumb as it is, plus I usually put a small cooler or travel bag on the rack when traveling.



I'll say this, my '04 Ultra Classis was rock solid at high highway speeds (100mph+), for some reason the '06 SE is a bit unstable, however when the wife and I went out to WV for the weekend it did feel a bit more stable all loaded, both saddlebags, the tourpak and a pak on top of it.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2005, 08:25:25 PM by FR8TRN »
Logged

FR8TRN

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1355
  • Ya ever take a crap so big your pants fit better??
Re: SE
« Reply #10 on: September 15, 2005, 08:32:45 PM »

Quote
The lid of the tour pak could be ten pounds heavier by itself...at least it feals it.



You sure got that right, that thing is heavy.  Not as easy to take apart the backrest on it either, my wife hates the lumbar support so I'm removing it and will probably have the padding in it cut in half or some lighter weight (pressure) padding put in.
Logged

06ULTRASE

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 278
  • In Memory of Scott Wheelihan

    • CVO1: 06 FLHTUCSE (SOLD)
    • CVO2: 09 FLTRSE3 (SOLD)
    • CVO3: 13 FLHTUCSE8
Re: SE
« Reply #11 on: September 15, 2005, 09:38:50 PM »

My biggest disappointment is the cotton picking head light, you would think that a headlight that cost $162 would be a BETTER light but that's not the case.
Logged

FR8TRN

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1355
  • Ya ever take a crap so big your pants fit better??
Re: SE
« Reply #12 on: September 15, 2005, 09:50:58 PM »

Quote
My biggest disappointment is the cotton picking head light, you would think that a headlight that cost $162 would be a BETTER light but that's not the case.



LOL, I've about had it with night riding anyways, too many damn bugs commitin suicide.
Logged

Twolanerider

  • 25K CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50545
  • EBCM #1.5 Emeritus DSP # ? Critter Gawker #?
    • MO


    • CVO1: 2000 Triple Red Screamin' Eagle Road Glide
    • CVO2: 2002 Candy Brandywine Screamin' Eagle Road King
    • CVO3: 1999 Arresting Red FXR2
Re: SE
« Reply #13 on: September 15, 2005, 11:23:11 PM »

Quote
My biggest disappointment is the cotton picking head light, you would think that a headlight that cost $162 would be a BETTER light but that's not the case.



Pay a little more Harley tax and get the new HID headlight?
Logged

ridefar

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 254
  • I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Re: SE
« Reply #14 on: September 15, 2005, 11:23:27 PM »

Regarding the tour pak adapter to locate tour-pak further to rear: where can I get one? Thanks
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All
 

Page created in 0.146 seconds with 25 queries.