www.CVOHARLEY.com

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Rinehart 2-2 Opinions  (Read 2299 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Zinister

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 256

    • CVO1: 2009 FXSTSSE3
Rinehart 2-2 Opinions
« on: March 29, 2011, 10:07:45 AM »
Has anyone tried the new 2-2 Rineharts? Also if you have experience with the crossbacks, please chime in.


I'm looking at 2-2 because I like the look so please lets keep on the 2-2 pipes. Usually these topics drift into why the 2-1 are better performance wise but I'll give a little up for the look.
Logged

Wild Card

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 462

    • CVO1: FXSTSSE3
Re: Rinehart 2-2 Opinions
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2011, 10:42:46 AM »
Quote from: Zinister on March 29, 2011, 10:07:45 AM
Has anyone tried the new 2-2 Rineharts? Also if you have experience with the crossbacks, please chime in.


I'm looking at 2-2 because I like the look so please lets keep on the 2-2 pipes. Usually these topics drift into why the 2-1 are better performance wise but I'll give a little up for the look.

Got a link to these?
Logged

Old Salt

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7
Re: Rinehart 2-2 Opinions
« Reply #2 on: April 19, 2011, 02:11:59 PM »
I installed the true duels and 4" mufflers on my FLHXSE2 along with a SE tuner and K+N filter.  This bike runs great.  It was a nice power upgrade and it sounds like a harley should.  It's not to loud either.  Just a nice deep rumble.  After getting used to the looks of the crossover I decided I like the look better that a lot of the other systems out there.  You won't go wrong with Rinehart.
Logged

Zinister

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 256

    • CVO1: 2009 FXSTSSE3
Re: Rinehart 2-2 Opinions
« Reply #3 on: May 08, 2011, 12:51:09 PM »
I called Rinehart about thier 2-2 pipes and they recomended the crossbacks. The new Churchill exhaust is still being redesigned. It's really just a longer version of thier 2-2 pipes I think.

Anyone running the crossbacks on a modified 110? I have the stock headers and Bub 7 slipons currently and they are holding me back on the top end. My dealership ran cycle shcks w/o baffles and gained 14 HP.

What size are the crossback primaries?
Logged

MC88

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50
  • CVO1: 2009 FXSTSSE3 CVO2:2011 FLHXSE2
Re: Rinehart 2-2 Opinions
« Reply #4 on: May 09, 2011, 07:31:44 PM »
I run the crossback on my 09 Springer .

They are a great looking set of pipes , No problems at all ,  quite loud but they came with two sets of baffles , but both seem like the same volume .

I had the BR 2 into 1 but i didnt like the look and the sound , the rineharts win hands down .
Logged

Zinister

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 256

    • CVO1: 2009 FXSTSSE3
Re: Rinehart 2-2 Opinions
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2011, 10:27:07 AM »
What have you done to the bike and whats your dyno numbers with each pipe?
Logged

InfernoCVO

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 82

    • CVO1: 08 FXSTSSE2
    • CVO2: 2012 cvo street glide
Re: Rinehart 2-2 Opinions
« Reply #6 on: August 01, 2011, 04:49:27 AM »
Zinister did you go with the crossbacks? and if so are your numbers good? I have an 08 springer with woods 555 and 10.5 to 1 pistons,V&H big radious can only get 93hp 112tq. Like the look of the crossbacks but don't want to buy and end up with the same numbers. Thanks
Logged

Zinister

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 256

    • CVO1: 2009 FXSTSSE3
Re: Rinehart 2-2 Opinions
« Reply #7 on: August 05, 2011, 09:58:53 PM »
I haven't made the jump yet.

I have heard a set on a moded 103 and they sound good but I don't know if the performance is there yet.
Logged
 

Page created in 0.129 seconds with 21 queries.