A big V-rod engine in a dresser would be cool. Run it out to 4.250 bore X 4.5 stroke with water cooled jugs and heads, side by side rods on a one piece balanced crank, 4 valve heads. Doesn't need to have DOHC if they can figure out how to build quality lifters. A big engine like that isn't going to run hi rpm anyway so no need to build tall DOHC heads. I guess this sounds like another engine I've never owned but have read about. I agree with the dual engine lineup so riders can select which engine they want. I like the V-Rod engine for what it is but after test riding one, I'd be hard pressed to buy one since it just doesn't fit right. Start with a Dyna style frame and work from there. Hard to find an engine design that the Japanese haven't already built. Do we blame them or ourselves and H-D for not stepping up first?
I had to find a engine displacement program to see what this beast would be. Right at 128ci which is bigger than the previous mentioned engine or 2.1L. An engine like that should be capable of 150 lbft and around 130-140hp. A one piece cast block and cylinders with wet sleeves so it's rebuildable but captures much of the noise we hear from pistons etc. Just this big lump of styled aluminum that's fairly quiet, the heart of a lion and MADE IN THE USA. Some may think I don't care where my bikes are made. I prefer an American made bike but performance and reliability come in there as well. Build a reliable engine like that and watch the foreign bike owners line up. I'd sport wood over a H-D bagger built with an engine like that. H-D could build it but is there enough profit in it for them? Guess pride is gone and being able to say they build the most reliable. We're the dying breed and last owners of the current style engine. Do we force H-D into death by continuing to build the current engine and the EPA kills it or do we accept the fact that we need to tolerate different engine designs and usher in a new era. I'd like to see H-D roll another 100 years but hey, none of us will be around.