www.CVOHARLEY.com
CVO Technical => Milwaukee-Eight => Topic started by: harleytuner on February 15, 2018, 02:07:15 PM
-
I had a 2017 CVO Street Glide come in for a tune the other day, stock top end and a cam i've never heard of before (Max Cell 828). Running a Thunder Header, a Heavy Breather and a Power Vision. Other than that it's stock. The clutch is slipping some as well.
-
Good curve with nice TQ and HP. Who makes that cam?
-
Take a look at a Red Shift 468 cam. The dyno sheet looks impressive. I have not spoken to anyone about the reality. It sure looks like a winner. Straight bolt in.
-
Another sheet
-
I have not seen a sheet on the 114/118 though.
-
Good curve with nice TQ and HP. Who makes that cam?
Jim's Vtwin out of North Carolina. I've never heard of them until this bike came in. We have a local dealer that uses them quit a bit though. I haven't been able to find them on the web anywhere.
-
I have not seen a sheet on the 114/118 though.
I've looked at them they agree they look to be a contender. I've used quit a few Redshift cams and i've never been able to reproduce their results yet. But they torque curve looks phenomenal. I'll be testing a few of the TTS cams pretty soon and then possibly the Redshift.
-
I've looked at them they agree they look to be a contender. I've used quit a few Redshift cams and i've never been able to reproduce their results yet. But they torque curve looks phenomenal. I'll be testing a few of the TTS cams pretty soon and then possibly the Redshift.
You going to be testing on which M8? I'll be interested in seeing the results of the TTS cams. Mine is a 117, do not see many tests with this motor.
-
Take a look at a Red Shift 468 cam. The dyno sheet looks impressive. I have not spoken to anyone about the reality. It sure looks like a winner. Straight bolt in.
Another sheet
Both sheets have the correction factor of SAE 3. Most of the other sheets posted are at SAE 5. I'm sure there's some difference in the numbers when using the same correction factors.
-
Both sheets have the correction factor of SAE 3. Most of the other sheets posted are at SAE 5. I'm sure there's some difference in the numbers when using the same correction factors.
My understanding is factor of 3 is the level of smoothing ripple in the curve, 5 is more smoothing.
SAE is a correction factor, and will show lower numbers than STD