Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]  All

Author Topic: 09 SERG rear shocks??  (Read 3384 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

LC110

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 666
    • WI


    • CVO1: 2009 FLTRSE3 Stardust Silver / Titanium Dust 1of 1344
Re: 09 SERG rear shocks??
« Reply #15 on: June 09, 2010, 10:45:04 AM »

I will third the HD hyd shocks. Enjoying airless comfort.
Logged
Spending time learning the science of the mechanisms of friction, lubrication, and wear of interacting surfaces that are in relative motion
Razorback Performance Built & Tuned 113@ 122.59 HP/139.30 TQ

Highjagger

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2523
  • tradition`s not worship ash but pass on the fire

    • CVO1: FXSE Breakout Pro Street 2016 ,- and 2011 Crossbones FLSTSB ,- and 2016 LowRider s FXDLs
Re: 09 SERG rear shocks??
« Reply #16 on: June 09, 2010, 11:16:24 AM »

I'll second the new HD Progressives!  I installed them on mine and it was night and day difference.  Then I felt the jolt in the front so I took it in and had the front forks serviced with regular fork oil and not the heavy duty stuff.  The ride is much better and the wife likes it now.  Can't do much about the low profile tires so there is still a little stiffness in the ride.

The HD hyd shocks makes the rear end feel easier to handle and faster in reaction , great improvement for me .

But regular fork oil is the one that was in the fork .
Why did you get a better feeling with refilling the same oil ?
My plan was to change to the HD performance fork oil to get a more secure feeling at highspeed-riding ( and hope to loose the swimming of the front ).
Logged
Success is to stand up one more than to fall down

BigLew

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2794
Re: 09 SERG rear shocks??
« Reply #17 on: June 09, 2010, 12:50:43 PM »

I bought the ST, hope I enjoy them.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All
 

Page created in 0.231 seconds with 22 queries.