No offense, but the time period a bike is in a shop should not be an indicator of tune quality.
There is normally a noticeable difference between a completely tuned bike and one that has plug-and-play tune jobs.
IMO one needs back to back riding experiences on the same motorcycle to the objectively feel the difference.
Bob
Well, we'll have to agree to disagree then. A two day tune vs a two hour tune is what I would consider an indicator.
As for the piggy back devices, I don't really need or care to do back to back with and without test rides. Have ridden countless stock bikes and bikes with bad tunes to recognize a problem. For most bikes with simple upgrades like air cleaners, pipes and bolt in cams, the piggy backs will be just fine, especially if it's a bagger. These bikes aren't racers, a good tune with decent fuel mileage, that is fine for these bikes. Now for the lightened dyna with an over square motor, running 12:1+ compression on pump gas with a hand made exhaust that the materials alone cost more a new TTs system, then yes, that bike needs, deserves, must have a bunch of dyno time to squeeze everything out it. But for the typical bolt on/bolt in bagger, slapp a piggy back on and be done. Thats my two cents. But I get you do this for a living, yada, yada, yada. So you are right, every bike needs a full on dyno tune, and a pro who has tuned thousands of bikes can probably pull a tune from his file and get to a perfect tune within minutes vs days. I got it. I still don't think that every bike needs a full on tune.