Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Why Two O2 Sensors?  (Read 1227 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TRS300

  • Vendor
  • Junior CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 97
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • CA


    • CVO1: 2015 CVO SG (Hard Candy Mercury)
    • CVO2: 2002 Road Glide (Silver)
    • CVO3: 2005 Chrysler 300C (Custom)
Why Two O2 Sensors?
« on: August 29, 2018, 03:56:56 AM »

May be simple question but not obvious to me...

Why can a car operate on one O2 sensor controlling 3 to 4 pistons / injectors.

But a Harley cannot use a single O2 sensor to control 2 cylinders?

In other words, why cannot the blended O2 reading be monitored and the same signal fed back to both cylinders?

Regards

--
Logged

windjammer

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 209
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • WI


    • CVO1: 2015 FLHTKSE
    • CVO2: 2008 FXSTSSE2 sold
Re: Why Two O2 Sensors?
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2018, 10:17:19 AM »

Many cars have multiple o2 sensors usually before and after the CAT Harley uses one for each cylinder before the CAT.
Logged

GregKhougaz

  • It's a Two Wheeled World.
  • Global Moderator
  • 5k CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9542
    • CA


    • CVO1: '22 BMW Grand America
    • CVO2: '18 Porsche C4 GTS
    • CVO3: '22 Porsche Macan GTS and my mountain bike.
Re: Why Two O2 Sensors?
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2018, 11:00:15 AM »

Why? Using two sensors, one for each cylinder, is more precise. If you were to use one, both cylinders would receive the same AFR adjustments. In Harley's V-Twin, the rear cylinder typically runs hotter because of its placement. The different temperatures between the two cylinders alone justify different settings.
Logged


"We've got some tall tales we love to tell.  They may not be true but we sure do remember them well." 
 Sawyer Brown

When you come to a fork in the road... take it!

TRS300

  • Vendor
  • Junior CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 97
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • CA


    • CVO1: 2015 CVO SG (Hard Candy Mercury)
    • CVO2: 2002 Road Glide (Silver)
    • CVO3: 2005 Chrysler 300C (Custom)
Re: Why Two O2 Sensors?
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2018, 12:57:38 AM »

Why? Using two sensors, one for each cylinder, is more precise. If you were to use one, both cylinders would receive the same AFR adjustments. In Harley's V-Twin, the rear cylinder typically runs hotter because of its placement. The different temperatures between the two cylinders alone justify different settings.

Well... the 4 cylinders in one half of a V8 receive the same AFR adjustments also based on one sensor in the blended exhaust...

You raise a good point about the difference in temperature of each cylinder...  And yes for sure you will get more precise control for sure.

But the narrowband sensor is a on/off switch trying to maintain 4.7 AFR regardless of cylinder temperature. It doesn't care about temp in regard to trying to maintain 1.0 lamda (14.7 AFR).  So?

The only thing I can think is that one cylinder might run rich and the other lean and the two would result in a 4.7 O2 measure when blended.  But again I would expect it would be the same for the 4 cylinders that share a common meter in a car?

Now that I think of this more I think it has to do with the fuel injection.  On a car all the cylinders are at the adjustment of a single throttle body, to O2 feedback adjusts the mixture of the single EFI throttle body.  Whereas Harley controls injection to each cylinder independently (unlike carbs of the old days). so if each cylinder sees it's own injector that injector needs to be controlled by it's own O2 feedback loop.

I'm assuming the Harley has independent injection for each cylinder when I say this...  I'll have to check.  If not, I'm still confused.

--
Logged

grc

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14216
  • AKA Grouchy Old Fart
    • IN


    • CVO1: 2005 SEEG2
Re: Why Two O2 Sensors?
« Reply #4 on: August 30, 2018, 08:51:08 AM »


Depends on the type of fuel injection system.  Sequential port injection is what Harley uses, but considering the very short distance from each cylinder's intake port to the other cylinder's port and the uneven timing arrangement, some fuel can wind up in the other cylinder.  Automotive systems can be sequential port systems, or direct injection systems.  Direct injection systems are the most precise of course.

As for why Harley doesn't use one sensor at the inlet end of the collector, it may be due to the fact that non-touring models don't use a collector exhaust system and they want one system that will work on all models, or it may be due to the fact that the collector also houses the catalyst in very close proximity which could affect the sensor.  It could also be due to the fact that the Harley injection system is imprecise and a blended AFR would not be accurate enough for best overall operation.  Hard to tell why Harley does many of the things they do.

Jerry
Logged
Jerry - 2005 Cherry SEEG  -  Member # 1155

H-D and me  -  a classic love / hate relationship.  Current score:  love 40, hate 50, bewildered 10.

Doc 1

  • Doc 1
  • Vendor
  • Elite CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 613
Re: Why Two O2 Sensors?
« Reply #5 on: September 01, 2018, 12:25:10 AM »

Each cylinder does its own work, each cylinder breathes differently, so each cylinder has to report the the ECM so the Adaptive Fuel Values can make small adjustments to maintain the Fuel Request in the Fuel Table. One sensor in a neutral area would not be accurate fuel delivery for both cylinders.
 
Logged
Doc's Performance Tuning

www.docsperformancetuning.com
 

Page created in 0.138 seconds with 21 queries.