Topic: 2010 cvo S. G. 122 hp (Read 5872 times)

laylonlor · « **on:** December 24, 2010, 02:56:00 PM »

been riding my 2010 S.G., with the new up grades,... feels like a new bike, ended up 130/130, ....to the rear wheel 122/122, ...it has a woods 400 cam, deweys heads, smith pushrods 10/5 hd pistons ,tts tuner, d/d zilla fatcat, and tuned by jd, can't keep up with my busa, lol,but its nice ride

timtoolman · « **Reply #1 on:** December 24, 2010, 08:57:08 PM »

check out the website at hendrick motorsport of u tube videos of their bagger from hendrick motorsport spanking hyabusa's in thr qtr mile!!!!

we love those 400-6 cams dont we!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! how does it sound!

mlb3164 · « **Reply #2 on:** December 24, 2010, 09:11:10 PM »

Tim did you mean Hemrick Performance? He has some cool YouTube videos spanking the sportbikes.

HD Street Performance · « **Reply #3 on:** December 25, 2010, 07:31:26 AM »

Nice result. Good job,
Glad you took the time and effort to see this great tuner and follow his lead on the pipe etc.
Feel free to fax (253-344-1189) or email me the dyno and I will post it. I would not expect that 400 to be too much noisier than stock with the corrected geometry and the way I set the springs up. Dave confirmed that when we spoke.

timtoolman · « **Reply #4 on:** December 25, 2010, 12:48:25 PM »

oops yes i had the wrong name, sorry

eleft36 · « **Reply #5 on:** December 26, 2010, 07:02:03 PM »

Quote from: laylonlor on December 24, 2010, 02:56:00 PM

been riding my 2010 S.G., with the new up grades,... feels like a new bike, ended up 130/130, ....to the rear wheel 122/122, ...it has a woods 400 cam, deweys heads, smith pushrods 10/5 hd pistons ,tts tuner, d/d zilla fatcat, and tuned by jd, can't keep up with my busa, lol,but its nice ride

I was unaware a dyno for motor cycles could get info from something other than rolling the rear wheel, please enlighten me.

Maybe I don't know what you meant to say.

Al

laylonlor · « **Reply #6 on:** December 26, 2010, 10:08:00 PM »

hey dewey ,get jd to forward the results, and post them ,.... yea them woods 400 cams are nice, everything came togather nice , i had some good people , that put everything in order, thanks to all......HAPPY NEW YEAR, NOW I'M OFF TO FL.

Phaq2 · « **Reply #7 on:** December 27, 2010, 08:28:52 AM »

Was the crank addressed. Ride safe

laylonlor · « **Reply #8 on:** December 27, 2010, 08:53:50 AM »

nothing done to the crank

Phaq2 · « **Reply #9 on:** December 27, 2010, 09:00:17 AM »

Thanks

cvobiker · « **Reply #10 on:** December 27, 2010, 02:32:03 PM »

Quote from: laylonlor on December 27, 2010, 08:53:50 AM

nothing done to the crank

Too Bad ...... It wont be long,,, and you will

laylonlor · « **Reply #11 on:** December 27, 2010, 03:58:35 PM »

think so, if i do it will be a larger engine when finished

cvobiker · « **Reply #12 on:** December 28, 2010, 09:08:53 AM »

Quote from: laylonlor on December 27, 2010, 03:58:35 PM

think so, if i do it will be a larger engine when finished

Get an early start,,,,, go check your run out

laylonlor · « **Reply #13 on:** December 28, 2010, 01:49:08 PM »

what'n all is involed when checking the run out

laylonlor · « **Reply #14 on:** December 28, 2010, 02:15:08 PM »

you trying to voodoo me,....my wrench says it was one thousand run out 300 miles ago, and not to worry ,

cvobiker · « **Reply #15 on:** December 28, 2010, 11:08:40 PM »

Just saying' it just seems these newer cranks (06 up) dont hold up to big horsepower... Lots of reports on this board and many others discussing this issue. With your numbers definitely should have welded and plugged the crank. Curious, are you running gear drive cams?

laylonlor · « **Reply #16 on:** December 29, 2010, 12:36:20 AM »

CHAIN DRIVE CAMS , THE MOTOR WASN'T OUT OF THE BIKE JUST HEADS CAMS AND OTHER GOODIES, WASN'T TAKING THE MOTOR OUT FOR THAT, I'LL CROSS THAT BRIDGE LATER IF I NEED TO

Proctor · « **Reply #17 on:** December 29, 2010, 04:06:26 PM »

Quote from: cvobiker on December 28, 2010, 11:08:40 PM

Just saying' it just seems these newer cranks (06 up) dont hold up to big horsepower... Lots of reports on this board and many others discussing this issue. With your numbers definitely should have welded and plugged the crank. Curious, are you running gear drive cams?

That's exactly why I sent my crank out!!! Balanced, welded and timken upgrade. No worries!!!

HD Street Performance · « **Reply #18 on:** December 29, 2010, 05:47:56 PM »

Gee wizz leave the guy alone. He is an adult and was well aware of the crank issue before he did the build. It has already been well documented and leave it at that. He is enjoying the ride let it be.

timtoolman · « **Reply #19 on:** January 06, 2011, 10:28:55 AM »

yeah! what he said!

HD Street Performance · « **Reply #20 on:** January 31, 2011, 04:33:13 PM »

This is the dyno.
Good job to the dealer wrench and Dave at JDs

laylonlor · « **Reply #21 on:** January 31, 2011, 08:20:14 PM »

yea thats me , i got 2k miles on the build now, been in Fl. blasting around, been running good

Twolanerider · « **Reply #22 on:** January 31, 2011, 08:38:56 PM »

Quote from: laylonlor on December 24, 2010, 02:56:00 PM

been riding my 2010 S.G., with the new up grades,... feels like a new bike, ended up 130/130, ....to the rear wheel 122/122, ...

Quote from: laylonlor on December 29, 2010, 12:36:20 AM

CHAIN DRIVE CAMS , THE MOTOR WASN'T OUT OF THE BIKE JUST HEADS CAMS AND OTHER GOODIES, WASN'T TAKING THE MOTOR OUT FOR THAT, I'LL CROSS THAT BRIDGE LATER IF I NEED TO

I'm confused (not uncommon). How'd you get the 130/130 dyno number at the crank if the engine was never out of the bike?

bigjohn · « **Reply #23 on:** January 31, 2011, 09:02:14 PM »

Its usually done by calculation.

very nice build laylonor

here is some reading on dyno's, I forget most of the story but this explains a little.

http://www.hotrod.com/thehistoryof/113_0603_dynojet_chassis_dyno/index.html

http://forums.gogodiesel.com/showthread.php?13465-whats-the-difference-between-dynojets

HILLSIDECYCLE.COM · « **Reply #24 on:** February 01, 2011, 06:49:07 AM »

He is probably refering to actual numbers, and the SAE was 122/122.
IF the powerplant was on a engine dyno, then expect to see approx. 15% or more, as the driveline gobbles up that much.
Scott

Mr. Warlock · « **Reply #25 on:** March 17, 2011, 11:54:19 AM »

Seriously............. after looking at the outcome of this build and many others, what would / could be better than this configuration for a new 110? Is there a down side to this build?

Thanks, Rick

sadunbar · « **Reply #26 on:** March 17, 2011, 12:02:39 PM »

Somebody please tell me Charlie Sheen hasn't purchased a CVO....

Just kidding!!!!

Proctor · « **Reply #27 on:** March 17, 2011, 12:17:17 PM »

WINNING...

I like the idea that I kept mine a 110, so when people ask, I say it's a 110, see the badging...

Dr.D · « **Reply #28 on:** March 17, 2011, 01:36:56 PM »

What are the threshold numbers for doing a crankcase improvement?

Mr. Warlock · « **Reply #29 on:** March 17, 2011, 04:39:05 PM »

Quote from: sadunbar on March 17, 2011, 12:02:39 PM

Somebody please tell me Charlie Sheen hasn't purchased a CVO....

Just kidding!!!!

Sorry, I'm not getting it???

I'm getting ready to do mine and this looks like a very good all around package to me.

HD Street Performance · « **Reply #30 on:** March 17, 2011, 05:41:00 PM »

There really is no hard fast rule of thumb. Some go without cause and others that are beat on last and cause no issues.
Considering the level of the build I would consider weld and true of the crank. Timkens would not be required as the latest roller bearings seem to be holding well but would not hurt either.

sadunbar · « **Reply #31 on:** March 17, 2011, 06:16:15 PM »

Quote from: Mr. Warlock on March 17, 2011, 04:39:05 PM

Sorry, I'm not getting it???

I'm getting ready to do mine and this looks like a very good all around package to me.

Charlie has been calling himself the "Warlock" lately....

When I saw Mr. Warlock.....bad joke....nevermind....

timtoolman · « **Reply #32 on:** March 17, 2011, 09:24:17 PM »

The only downside to this build? was a question asked?? REAR TIRE LIFE!!!!!!! im finding that out now

Mr. Warlock · « **Reply #33 on:** March 18, 2011, 08:08:12 AM »

Quote from: sadunbar on March 17, 2011, 06:16:15 PM

Charlie has been calling himself the "Warlock" lately....

When I saw Mr. Warlock.....bad joke....nevermind....

Ahhhh, I haven't been reading or listening to any of his crap so I didn't get it......... lol, that's fine.

So, does this build want the Zilla pipe (which is what I see listed) or the regular Fat Cat pipe? Most of what I have read is that for a stock bore 110 the regular Fat Cat is what works the best?

Mr. Warlock · « **Reply #34 on:** March 18, 2011, 08:09:10 AM »

Quote from: timtoolman on March 17, 2011, 09:24:17 PM

The only downside to this build? was a question asked?? REAR TIRE LIFE!!!!!!! im finding that out now

I can live with that, lol............ as long as the wife hangs on tighter I'm all set.

Dr.D · « **Reply #35 on:** March 22, 2011, 04:49:23 PM »

Those are some really nice dyno curves without flat spot or dips along with good top numbers. I would guess the other downside would be the cost but who's counting dollars here?

Author Topic: 2010 cvo S. G. 122 hp (Read 5872 times)