www.CVOHARLEY.com
CVO Technical => Intake/Exhaust/ECM => Topic started by: Texas 103 on March 18, 2017, 12:40:09 PM
-
Just off the Dyno, 4th gear pull, SAE 120.5 HP/ 136 Ft. Lbs. Pretty pleased with the outcome. Didn't expect that from the SE 585 Cam .Was shooting for 125 square, but I'll take it ! Grab a handful @ 2000, it's yanks hard.. . a BIG thanks to the following guys :
Head Wrench: Tom Talamantez @ Maverick HD http://www.maverickhd.com/ (http://www.maverickhd.com/)
Machine Work & Heads : Eric @ AMS https://www.automotivemachine.com/ (https://www.automotivemachine.com/)
Tuner: Ed Dahair: @ The Dyno Difference http://www.thedynodifference.com/ (http://www.thedynodifference.com/)
Steve @ Fullsac Performance: https://fullsac.com/
"Unbalanced" Harry
John Sachs
The Build: 117 SE Drop in Kit, SE Flat Tops , Cylinders Zero Decked, Heads milled 0.18 for 92CC, 2.120 Intake , Cometic .030 Head Gasket. SE 585 cams. SE High Volume Pump. Fullsac DX Pipe, CVO Cans 2,25 Baffles
Static Compression :10.64:1 Corrected Compression: 9.96:1 Cold Cranking Compression: @ 420' ( Dallas) 208.2
-
Congratulations Greg! Very nice build. That will be a blast to ride
-
Some very impressive numbers
Jason
-
Nice.
Couple of questions- why the 585? More lift or?
#2 Use the Harley flat top and how did you figure your compression?
Leaning towards using the entire kit except the lifters but still researching. Thanks
-
My question is why a 4th gear pull?
Std or Corrected results?
-
Nice.
Couple of questions- why the 585? More lift or?
#2 Use the Harley flat top and how did you figure your compression?
Leaning towards using the entire kit except the lifters but still researching. Thanks
Will, I chose the SE 585 for the torque where I ride 90% of the time. That old bagger weighs 900 Lbs. Just didn't want the power further out to the right like the 259's. Used the HD flat top . HD lifters, figured I'd just change them out at 10K or so,. Think you will be pleased with the kit as long as you at least bump compression, .030 gasket, zero deck cyls.
-
My question is why a 4th gear pull?
Std or Corrected results?
SAE Numbers. Reason for 4th gear pull is the rear tire @ 6000 rpm in 5th gear is @ 123 MPH . Tire is not rated for much more than that and Ed has had a rear tire let go on the dyno and it wasn't fun.,Just didn't want to beat the tire up
Difference between 4th & 5th gear pulls are about 3-6% bump. Just didn't see any need of a 5th or 6th gear pull . From what I have read and asked around consensus is most tuners use 4th gear.
-
You'll be able to pull cars out of ditches with that thing! I agree with you on TQ. If sacrificing any of that low end meant 5 more ponies, I wouldn't be interested in that trade. And at 120HP, most cruisers/baggers on the road aren't going to keep up with you in the event you did want to "play around" a little bit anyways 8)
-
You'll be able to pull cars out of ditches with that thing! I agree with you on TQ. If sacrificing any of that low end meant 5 more ponies, I wouldn't be interested in that trade. And at 120HP, most cruisers/baggers on the road aren't going to keep up with you in the event you did want to "play around" a little bit anyways 8)
Was kinda thinking the same thing. If I don't have it done by 5500, It's ain't gonna get done...I built this to tour anywhere and have good manners..In the Hill Country now at my office, Will be playing on the sisters later in the week..
-
Sure glad your happy with her. I watched the video again of it on the dyno and had to wipe drool off my chin think about the 3rd.
-
Sure glad your happy with her. I watched the video again of it on the dyno and had to wipe drool off my chin think about the 3rd.
Thanks, Can't wait until your build is here April 3rd for a Ed tune up..You will be smilin!!
-
Nice #s :2vrolijk_21: :2vrolijk_21: Nice Curves :2vrolijk_21: :2vrolijk_21:
Should be a Blast!!