Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Low Rider S cam choice  (Read 1719 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Murph83

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
Low Rider S cam choice
« on: March 21, 2017, 07:27:41 AM »

Hey Guys,

I'm trying to decide on a final cam choice for a 110 build I'm currently putting together. I have been reading through many posts and have narrowed it down to the TC-24D, 600sm or S&S 570. We have machined the cylinders to obtain 0 deck, 30 thou cometic gasket, modified 110 heads flowing 310 cfm with chambers set at 89cc ( 10.25-1 comp), 58mm SE throttle body and a Bassani Road Rage B1 exhaust. Any advice to make my choice easier would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

Murph
Logged

johnsachs

  • Vendor
  • Elite CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 747
Re: Low Rider S cam choice
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2017, 07:13:02 PM »

Seems all the stars are lined up for the 24D cams. They would be my choice.  ;)
John
Logged

Yellow09SERG

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2055

    • CVO1: FLTRSE3 YELLOW!!
Re: Low Rider S cam choice
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2017, 08:29:53 PM »

24D are serving me well with similar build
Logged
Most great stores start with a bad decision

Murph83

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
Re: Low Rider S cam choice
« Reply #3 on: March 28, 2017, 09:53:04 PM »

We fit the TC 24D and finished tuning it last Friday, 114hp / 115tq. We gained some hp but lost quiet a bit of tq compared to the original build ( 10-1 comp, stock 110 heads and tb, SE 585 cam made 106/126). It rides ok but the tq loss low in the rev range is noticeable over the original build
« Last Edit: March 30, 2017, 07:06:07 AM by Murph83 »
Logged

Scott7d

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 455
  • 2020 CVO Road Glide 117"
    • IN


    • CVO1: 2020 CVO Road Glide 117"
Re: Low Rider S cam choice
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2017, 07:01:52 AM »

Sorry to hear about the results (assuming you liked the TQ more than the HP, I would have).

Are you gonna try something else? I am not real familiar with the TC-24 other than it is very popular, but I noticed the 600 was also one of your choices. The sheets I've seen (with the right comp and combo of parts) have had layers and layers of TQ.

Keep us posted!
Logged
Scott Matlock
Iron Butt Ride List

Murph83

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
Re: Low Rider S cam choice
« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2017, 07:12:19 AM »

Yeah I think I will try another cam. The 600sm dyno sheets all seem to make very decent tq numbers and CR 575 graphs also look good.
Logged

16limited

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • MA

Re: Low Rider S cam choice
« Reply #6 on: March 30, 2017, 07:42:18 AM »

Try getting a new cam sprocket to advance the cams 4 degrees. not that much work or money but produces more power down low where you want it.
Logged

Murph83

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
Re: Low Rider S cam choice
« Reply #7 on: March 30, 2017, 07:46:49 AM »

I already have an Andrews sprocket here that I used on my previous bike, might have to give it a go before swapping cams out. Thanks 👍
Logged

Yellow09SERG

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2055

    • CVO1: FLTRSE3 YELLOW!!
Re: Low Rider S cam choice
« Reply #8 on: March 30, 2017, 10:35:39 AM »

Where did your CCP end up? HP numbers sound right but torque isn't where I would have expect with heads cut to 89 cc and 0 deck
Logged
Most great stores start with a bad decision
 

Page created in 0.125 seconds with 22 queries.