I am personally not trying to sell them thru any argument here,(and the profit margin is not that good FYFI) but rather, do not care for conjecture and snide scarcasim to try and sway folks from a product, that without your demeaning tone, is welcomed by un-named industry leaders across the continent.........
Aside from the punctuation and spelling issues that was almost well written. Will put on my (Willie G styled) editor's beanie and give it shot:
"I am personally not trying to sell them (the questionably needed and expensive tensioners [and, actually, yes, he was pitching them earlier, but that's beside the point]) via (or "through") any argument here. I do not care for the conjecture and snide sarcasm to try and sway folks from a product that, without your demeaning tone, is welcomed by unnamed leaders across the continent."
Now that it's in English let's discuss:
Sure you were pitching a product. Won't waste further time on the obvious.
It doesn't matter if you don't care for my conjecture or my opinion or my anecdotal thoughts. They are relevant, not out of line, hadn't been rudely offered and are, quite frankly, more on point than any lazily "unnamed" source without citation. Furthermore, when you're pitching a product to a site whose purpose is conversation and shared thought it's dubious to assume you won't have a conversation and be subjected to shared thoughts. That all such conversation doesn't bend to your wish or whim is unfortunate (for you) but it is what it is.
Scotty, if you didn't want a volley you shouldn't have served. The tone of the volleys has been questioning, not rude; though I'm willing to follow your lead on the tone. I'm sorry if insecurities or other issues make you so sensitive to relatively general questioning. But there are questions about this product relative to the assertions claimed for it. Those aren't likely to stop. "FYFI" (just to follow your lead).