Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Garmin 2620 vs 2730  (Read 2369 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

16HD117

  • When I was fifteen I wanted to be older. This is not what I expected!
  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3147
  • AKA 04hd103,AKA 07hd110,AKA 11hd110,AKA 16hd110
Garmin 2620 vs 2730
« on: June 11, 2006, 07:15:32 PM »

Since my 2620 was out of commission, I borrowed a 2730 to use on my trip to Memphis.  I was very disappointed!  The screen is almost impossible to see in direct sunlight and when it calculates a route the distance is a straight line calculation ("as the crow fly’s") not actual road mileage.  Did I not have the setups right or is that the only way it calculates mileage?  I tried different brightness settings on the display, nothing helped.
 [smiley=nixweiss.gif]
Logged






Life's journey is not to arrive safely at the grave in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out shouting Holy Chit......... What a Ride!


.

Crawdaddy

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 258
  • Enjoy your Freedom
Re: Garmin 2620 vs 2730
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2006, 07:52:00 PM »

04HD103

Sorry to hear that, I just bought my son a 2720 for his birthday July 3rd.  I hoped the unit would be better than your report.  I do think the set up has to be adjusted to route distance.  Or the software version must be for aircraft.  Just my thoughts.  I'll open my sons box and read the instructions.
Logged

110tHunDer

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14319
Re: Garmin 2620 vs 2730
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2006, 08:52:07 PM »


Tommy, the only time it shows you the distance in a straight line is when you do a find, such as when finding a city or restaurant, for example.  If you've laid in a route, the distance to the end will be utilizing the streets in the route, so it should be the true travel distance.

I agree with you on the brightness of the screen.  It's read-able, but could be better.  I had the brightness on my 2720 at 100% during my trip to Memphis and back and there were plenty of times I was wishing it was brighter still. [smiley=nixweiss.gif]  I leave it on the automatic brightness setting when it's in one of the cages and that has always been fine.  When I've checked it, it's only been at 80% on sunny days in the car/truck, but on the bike, even 100% was not enough.

Logged

Twolanerider

  • 25K CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50544
  • EBCM #1.5 Emeritus DSP # ? Critter Gawker #?
    • MO


    • CVO1: 2000 Triple Red Screamin' Eagle Road Glide
    • CVO2: 2002 Candy Brandywine Screamin' Eagle Road King
    • CVO3: 1999 Arresting Red FXR2
Logged

110tHunDer

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14319
Re: Garmin 2620 vs 2730
« Reply #4 on: June 12, 2006, 12:29:40 PM »


Yeah, it probably would, and I've thought about getting one, but it looks like chit, IMHO, and I'm not crazy about having velcro permanently attached to the unit all the time.

I've noticed that if I angle the unit downward (toward a more horizontal position) instead of directlyl toward me, it helps considerably with the glare.  If the display was any dimmer, I'd probably have to do something like the visor, but it's just good enough right now when angled down that I feel like I can get by without.

Logged

magicl1

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 427
Re: Garmin 2620 vs 2730
« Reply #5 on: June 19, 2006, 11:52:40 AM »

On the Garmin site, the 2620 is no longer produced, however some dealers are still selling their remaining stock or refurbished units.  2610 is still in production.
Logged
Supertrapp 2:1 and SERT
 

Page created in 0.139 seconds with 24 queries.