www.CVOHARLEY.com

CVO Technical => Electronic Toys and Gadgets => Topic started by: ultrafxr on December 22, 2006, 02:48:36 PM

Title: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on December 22, 2006, 02:48:36 PM
Would like to replace those long whip antennas that come on the UCs with something shorter and less obtrsuive.  What are my options?  How do they work compared to the factory set up, esp on the CB for transmit & reception.  Thanks in advance. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: HWYMAN1 on December 22, 2006, 02:57:42 PM
Quote
Would like to replace those long whip antennas that come on the UCs with something shorter and less obtrsuive.  What are my options?  How do they work compared to the factory set up, esp on the CB for transmit & reception.  Thanks in advance. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
ultrafxr,
have these on 06 SEUC:http://www.dynasite.net/dynaweb/1000441/explore.cfm?p=N&store=Y&U=1&SS=1&S=1000441 ( go harley davidson, then antenna kit)
No  problems with radio reception, used CB only rarely but worked fine. john
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Midnight Rider on December 22, 2006, 03:16:53 PM
Jerry,  same as above, just direct from Freedom...same price I think...

http://www.freedomcyclereno.com/eshopprod_cat_2852-23436_product_336753.Freedom_Dual_Antenna_set.htm

I have those on my bike and like them a lot.  I'm not a huge CB user, but in MV and a couple of other times, they seemed to work well...hard for me to know about range though, since I don't have anything to compare them to.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on December 22, 2006, 03:51:58 PM
Quote
Jerry,  same as above, just direct from Freedom...same price I think...

http://www.freedomcyclereno.com/eshopprod_cat_2852-23436_product_336753.Freedom_Dual_Antenna_set.htm

I have those on my bike and like them a lot.  I'm not a huge CB user, but in MV and a couple of other times, they seemed to work well...hard for me to know about range though, since I don't have anything to compare them to.

I have the Freedom antennas and they work fine.  The CB antenna has a tuning nut on it and once tuned they work as well as the factory antenna.  No CB on a bike is going to give long range anyway, but on the group rides I have done they worked fine including the Cripple Creek GTG this past year.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on December 22, 2006, 04:28:15 PM
Quote
Would like to replace those long whip antennas that come on the UCs with something shorter and less obtrsuive.  What are my options?  How do they work compared to the factory set up, esp on the CB for transmit & reception.  Thanks in advance. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]

Hello UltraFxr,

I look for the same point than you. :-/
I found these and it seems that they work for CB, AM/FM. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
http://www.jmcorp.com/ProductDetail.asp?PF=6&ProductID=HRUP-ATM

Somebody know this product ?

Thanks !
Merry Christmas and Happy new year !

Jacques

Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on December 22, 2006, 04:54:59 PM
Quote

Hello UltraFxr,

I look for the same point than you. :-/
I found these and it seems that they work for CB, AM/FM. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
http://www.jmcorp.com/ProductDetail.asp?PF=6&ProductID=HRUP-ATM

Somebody know this product ?

Thanks !
Merry Christmas and Happy new year !

Jacques


Wouldn't you know it would take a member from France to show us these.  Not sure anyone has these as they appear to be new.

I think I will order them and see how they look.

Thanks Jacques and Merry Christmas.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on December 24, 2006, 08:03:36 AM
Quote

Hello UltraFxr,

I look for the same point than you. :-/
I found these and it seems that they work for CB, AM/FM. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
http://www.jmcorp.com/ProductDetail.asp?PF=6&ProductID=HRUP-ATM

Somebody know this product ?

Thanks !
Merry Christmas and Happy new year !

Jacques

Thank you Jacques.  J & M makes very high quality products and these antenna look great.  I'll be trying them for sure.  Thanks again and Merry Christmas.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Midnight Rider on December 24, 2006, 10:57:34 AM
You guys get these and do the beta testing...the SWR being preset interests me and would be interested in knowing how well the CB works from those who have used the CB more than I have.  I'm assuming they are flexible so when you put a cover on at night (on the road) you can bend them over rather than removing them?
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on December 24, 2006, 11:10:56 AM
Quote
You guys get these and do the beta testing...the SWR being preset interests me and would be interested in knowing how well the CB works from those who have used the CB more than I have.  I'm assuming they are flexible so when you put a cover on at night (on the road) you can bend them over rather than removing them?

I wonder about flexibility, they look fixed to me.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on December 24, 2006, 02:08:17 PM
I made holes for the antennas in my full bike cover and my Oasis day cover came with the holes so that's not an issue for me.  Used to fold my long whips over and tuck behind the back rest to put the cover on.  But my CB antenna broke at the spring mount.  Can't say for sure but I'm concerned about bending it that much which is why I modified my full cover.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Fired00d on December 24, 2006, 02:24:33 PM
Quote
I made holes for the antennas in my full bike cover and my Oasis day cover came with the holes so that's not an issue for me.  Used to fold my long whips over and tuck behind the back rest to put the cover on.  But my CB antenna broke at the spring mount.  Can't say for sure but I'm concerned about bending it that much which is why I modified my full cover.
This is odd that the MoCo didn't provide a velcro opening in the back of the Oasis cover like they do all the other outdoor covers that are made to fit Ultra's. [smiley=nixweiss.gif]

 [smiley=pumpkin.gif]
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 [smiley=fireman.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Tbone on December 25, 2006, 08:42:32 AM
I'd really be interested in how the J & M's do with the CB.  I've been thinking about some short ones and having them pre-tuned sounds like the way to go.  If you guys get a set, please post your feedback on them.
Thanks,
Bob
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on December 25, 2006, 08:53:36 AM
Quote

I wonder about flexibility, they look fixed to me.

I've sended a mail to J&M.
When I received an answer, I'll post it. 8-)

Regards
Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: amigo Jorge on December 25, 2006, 10:40:47 AM
Quote
Would like to replace those long whip antennas that come on the UCs with something shorter and less obtrsuive.  What are my options?  How do they work compared to the factory set up, esp on the CB for transmit & reception.  Thanks in advance. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]


Mi amigo Jerry....I just installed these on my scooter.....It comes in 12" & 15" they have "laser flames". The reception is excellent......


http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?autofilter=1&part=ASM%2D8212F&N=700+314918+115&autoview=sku

Ride Safe,

Jorge
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on December 25, 2006, 12:21:06 PM
Quote


Mi amigo Jerry....I just installed these on my scooter.....It comes in 12" & 15" they have "laser flames". The reception is excellent......


http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?autofilter=1&part=ASM%2D8212F&N=700+314918+115&autoview=sku

Ride Safe,

Jorge

Good Afternoon, Jorge !

Nice style, but it's not flexible for Rjob749  ;)
Did it work with the CB ?
On the site it's only mentionned for AM/FM radio.  :-[

Thanks
Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on December 25, 2006, 01:32:57 PM
Quote
Mi amigo Jerry....I just installed these on my scooter.....It comes in 12" & 15" they have "laser flames". The reception is excellent......
http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?autofilter=1&part=ASM%2D8212F&N=700+314918+115&autoview=sku
Ride Safe,Jorge

Like some of the NAPA shorties those don't appear to be compatible with the CB, are they Jorge?


 ASM-8212F $19.95
Estimated Ship Date:  Tomorrow
    Show All  

Brand: ALLSales Manufacturing, Inc.
Product Line: All Sales Manufacturing Stubbie Antennas
Antenna Usage: AM/FM radio
Antenna Style: Stationary
Antenna Material: Stainless steel
Antenna Finish: Flames
Antenna Length (in): 12.0 in.
 
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: amigo Jorge on December 25, 2006, 02:16:25 PM
Quote

Like some of the NAPA shorties those don't appear to be compatible with the CB, are they Jorge?


 ASM-8212F $19.95
Estimated Ship Date:  Tomorrow
    Show All  

Brand: ALLSales Manufacturing, Inc.
Product Line: All Sales Manufacturing Stubbie Antennas
Antenna Usage: AM/FM radio
Antenna Style: Stationary
Antenna Material: Stainless steel
Antenna Finish: Flames
Antenna Length (in): 12.0 in.
 
 

Amigo Rob....Sincerely I haven't tested the new ones yet but I was using these ones (rubber material) (see pic) which I purchased during Daytona Bike Week last March and supposedly only worked for AM/FM but they worked for CB as well because I used in MV and they had a good reception.....so let's see [smiley=nixweiss.gif]

Have a good day today my buddy [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]..

Jorge
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on December 25, 2006, 02:34:57 PM
Quote
Amigo Rob....Sincerely I haven't tested yet but I was using until I got these pair ones like a rubber material (see pic) which I purchased during Daytona Bike Week last March and supposedly only worked for AM/FM but they worked for CB as well because I used in MV and they had a good reception.....so let's see [smiley=nixweiss.gif]
Have a good day today my buddy [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]..
Jorge

Ah, those look like my Freedom's, they do work great.

I'm looking forward to hearing if the J & M antennas work well, may just need to buy them.

In the hot weather my Freedom CB antenna is pretty floppy and pliable.  I think I may like the solid ones like J & M better.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on December 27, 2006, 01:30:28 PM
Quote

Ah, those look like my Freedom's, they do work great.

[highlight]I'm looking forward to hearing if the J & M antennas work well, may just need to buy them[/highlight].

In the hot weather my Freedom CB antenna is pretty floppy and pliable.  I think I may like the solid ones like J & M better.

I ordered a set of J&M shorties on the 22nd.  They are supposed to be here on the 2nd.  According to their add, they are pre-tuned for the CB and don't require any further adjustments.  I'll break out my SWR meter to verify that after I install them.  I have a set of Cycle Whips on right now.  They are about 14 inches long, but are questionalble for use with the CB.  Their web site doesn't say anything about it, but others say you can and some say you can't.  So I'm not taking the chance and will take them off when the J&M's come in.  I also like the fact that the J&M's use the set-screw like the stock antennas do.  Hopefully, they'll work great.  I'll post a pic and test results after I get them.

Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Bagger on December 27, 2006, 01:46:35 PM
I was thinking of doing my antennae the same way I did the antennae on my 02 Ultra.  I removed the long wire portion, cut off 12 inches from the end that fits into the mount, and reinstalled.  They worked great on the 02, and I no longer had to deal with the antennae hitting the garage door when I rode in and backed out.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Midnight Rider on December 27, 2006, 02:06:56 PM
Quote
I was thinking of doing my antennae the same way I did the antennae on my 02 Ultra.  I removed the long wire portion, cut off 12 inches from the end that fits into the mount, and reinstalled.  They worked great on the 02, and I no longer had to deal with the antennae hitting the garage door when I rode in and backed out.

Those things will poke your eye out, Henry... ;)  

I have the Freedom's, the flexibility is nice, but they do tend to get a little floppy when the temps are warm..the good thing about them is they will bend over for the cover I have when on the road.  Although I have never put an SWR meter on the CB, supposedly the knurled portion all the way up is the setting for our radios.

The J&M's look nice though, and with the set screw would not be a big deal to remove at night when using the cover.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on December 27, 2006, 02:53:22 PM
Quote

I ordered a set of J&M shorties on the 22nd.  They are supposed to be here on the 2nd.  According to their add, they are pre-tuned for the CB and don't require any further adjustments.  I'll break out my SWR meter to verify that after I install them.  I have a set of Cycle Whips on right now.  They are about 14 inches long, but are questionalble for use with the CB.  Their web site doesn't say anything about it, but others say you can and some say you can't.  So I'm not taking the chance and will take them off when the J&M's come in.  I also like the fact that the J&M's use the set-screw like the stock antennas do.  Hopefully, they'll work great.  I'll post a pic and test results after I get them.

Red

Looking forward to your report.  I'll hold off until you get the SWR on them.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Bagger on December 27, 2006, 04:13:54 PM
Quote

Those things will poke your eye out, Henry... ;)  

I have the Freedom's, the flexibility is nice, but they do tend to get a little floppy when the temps are warm..the good thing about them is they will bend over for [highlight]the cover I have when on the road[/highlight].  Although I have never put an SWR meter on the CB, supposedly the knurled portion all the way up is the setting for our radios.

The J&M's look nice though, and with the set screw would not be a big deal to remove at night when using [highlight]the cover[/highlight].

Forgive me for changing the subject, but would that be the "Oasis Day Cover?"  I gotta know.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Bagger on December 27, 2006, 04:18:11 PM
Quote

[highlight]Those things will poke your eye out, Henry... ;)[/highlight]  

I have the Freedom's, the flexibility is nice, but they do tend to get a little floppy when the temps are warm..the good thing about them is they will bend over for the cover I have when on the road.  Although I have never put an SWR meter on the CB, supposedly the knurled portion all the way up is the setting for our radios.

The J&M's look nice though, and with the set screw would not be a big deal to remove at night when using the cover.

Yeah, I know, and I know I'm pushing the risk envelope, but it does work.  I did, and still do, have a concern about power loss on the CB antenna.  I need to get my hands on an SWR meter and see if I need to get a different coil, since I'm shortening the CB antenna.  It does work, but my worry is I might be shortening the range.  Of course, I could just abandon that idea and go with your solution, but then again, floppy antennae are the downside.  Chit.  Decisions, decisions.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on December 27, 2006, 04:40:27 PM
Quote

Forgive me for changing the subject, but would that be the "[highlight]Oasis Day Cover[/highlight]?"  I gotta know.

Not sure about TC's cover but Ultrafxr has the oasis, here's his post.

Quote
[highlight]I made holes for the antennas in my full bike cover and my Oasis day cover [/highlight]came with the holes so that's not an issue for me.  Used to fold my long whips over and tuck behind the back rest to put the cover on.  But my CB antenna broke at the spring mount.  Can't say for sure but I'm concerned about bending it that much which is why I modified my full cover.

Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on December 27, 2006, 04:41:05 PM
Good deal Red.  We'll be looking forward to your report.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Fired00d on December 27, 2006, 04:43:25 PM
Quote

Not sure about TC's cover but Ultrafxr has the oasis, here's his post.


If I remember correctly I think Terry stated he had purchased an Exigent (http://www.exigentbikecovers.com/) cover for his for when he was on the road.

 [smiley=pumpkin.gif]
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 [smiley=fireman.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Midnight Rider on December 27, 2006, 05:35:53 PM
Quote
If I remember correctly I think Terry stated he had purchased an Exigent (http://www.exigentbikecovers.com/) cover for his for when he was on the road.

 [smiley=pumpkin.gif]
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 [smiley=fireman.gif]


You are correct d00d... [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]  I'm really happy with that cover too!!  It completely covers up the bike so that nobody can tell what's under there (they might mistake it for a 'Wing). It's small when folded as well.

Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Bagger on December 27, 2006, 06:26:43 PM
Quote


You are correct d00d... [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]  I'm really happy with that cover too!!  It completely covers up the bike so that nobody can tell what's under there (they might mistake it for a 'Wing). It's small when folded as well.


I' m sure you know why I'm asking, Terry.  I was thinking about getting the ODC, but decided not to since it looks like it might rub the paint if the wind blows, and will definitely booger up the paint if placed over a dusty bike.  My assumption is the same holds true for that Exigent, or however you spell it, thingy, cover, whatever.  Yes, I do clean my bike on long trips, but it is more like a "Ho bath" than a full fledged break out the hose, and q-tips case of beer cleaning.  My scoot never gets covered unless it is squeaky clean.  You know that Monk guy?  I'm kin to him.   :) [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on December 27, 2006, 06:32:37 PM
Quote

Yeah, I know, and I know I'm pushing the risk envelope, but it does work.  I did, and still do, have a [highlight]concern about power loss on the CB antenna[/highlight].  I need to get my hands on an SWR meter and see if I need to get a different coil, since I'm shortening the CB antenna.  It does work, but my worry is I might be shortening the range.  Of course, I could just abandon that idea and go with your solution, but then again, floppy antennae are the downside.  Chit.  Decisions, decisions.
Unless you did a measured cut on your factory whips, you "detuned" the antenna and your SWR is probably way out of whack.  Loss of power is not going to be your concern, as much as torching the front end of your CB.  Chances are, if you only key your radio for very short periods of time, you won't do any serious damage, but that's not a guarantee. Range is never going to very good with a motorcycle CB.  There just isn't enough ground plane to give you a decent radiation pattern.   I'll be happy if I'm running about 1.5:1 on "center" channel (19), and at less than around 2.2:1 on channel 1 and 40 with the J&M antennas.   I have asked what they tried to achieve for tuning at J&M, but have not gotten an answer back from them yet.  I'll keep you all posted.
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Bagger on December 27, 2006, 06:48:11 PM
Quote
Unless you did a measured cut on your factory whips, you "detuned" the antenna and your SWR is probably way out of whack.  Loss of power is not going to be your concern, as much as torching the front end of your CB.  Chances are, if you only key your radio for very short periods of time, you won't do any serious damage, but that's not a guarantee. Range is never going to very good with a motorcycle CB.  There just isn't enough ground plane to give you a decent radiation pattern.   I'll be happy if I'm running about 1.5:1 on "center" channel (19), and at less than around 2.2:1 on channel 1 and 40 with the J&M antennas.   I have asked what they tried to achieve for tuning at J&M, but have not gotten an answer back from them yet.  I'll keep you all posted.
Red

Thanks for the info Red.  I suppose I need to leave my SEUC as is until I hear of a better alternative for the whip antennas.

Henry
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Midnight Rider on December 28, 2006, 12:11:59 AM
Quote

I' m sure you know why I'm asking, Terry.  I was thinking about getting the ODC, but decided not to since it looks like it might rub the paint if the wind blows, and will definitely booger up the paint if placed over a dusty bike.  My assumption is the same holds true for that Exigent, or however you spell it, thingy, cover, whatever.  Yes, I do clean my bike on long trips, but it is more like a "Ho bath" than a full fledged break out the hose, and q-tips case of beer cleaning.  My scoot never gets covered unless it is squeaky clean.  You know that Monk guy?  I'm kin to him.   :) [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]

Yea, Henry...know what you're talking about.  The Exigent cover is so large that it comes all the way down over everything, so only a few places are touching the paint.  I carry some brand of detailing spray with me on trips and a couple of microfiber towels to get the worst of the bug guts, etc off.  I worry more about the bike being totally exposed to prying eyes...if they can't see what's under there, and it doesn't have HD written all over it, it gives me at least a false sense of security, if not a real one.  Besides, I have the GLARE to get the spider webs out of the paint... ;D
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on December 28, 2006, 09:46:58 AM
Quote

Thanks for the info Red.  I suppose I need to leave my SEUC as is until I hear of a better alternative for the whip antennas.

Henry
Henry,
You may not have to wait too long.  :)  I got a response back from J&M this morning, by the guy that designed them. The folks at J&M are fantastic people.  I've bought their headsets before and they are great to deal with.  Here's the response from them on the antennas:

They are tuned to an SWR of about 1.2:1 on channel 1 ,,, 2.0:1 on channel 20 and 2.7:1 on channel 40 ,,,,,,,

As each bike will be slightly different because of the Harley CB antenna load coil already installed into the tail trunk,,,,, this can vary slightly from bike to bike ,,, ,,,,,

I have designed the antennas just slightly on the long side so that you can fine tune them to your particular bike by taking off the top cap and pulling an inch or two at a time of copper out of the top of the antenna ,,,,, to fine tune the SWR to be the same on channels 1 and 40 ,,, that way all the other channels are the same or less than 1 and 40 as far as SWR is concerned ,,,,

Hope this helps ,,,,,,

Happy New Year to you and your family ,,,,,,

John Lazzeroni


He apparently figured that most people talk primarily in channels 1-20 (which in my experience, has been the case), so he went with optimally tuning channel 1 and it going up from there.  2:1 is acceptable although I would have preferred the 1.2.1 at channel 20 instead.   He also mentions the options of fine tuning the antenna to each individual bike, so that can be good, if the SWR is higher than what he designed them for.  

Hopefully, this will help your decision on which way to go.  They aren't cheap antennas, but with the excellent quality of J&M headsets I've gotten from them, I'm sure the antennas will be worth the cost and will probably work as advertised.  Also, I got them with free shipping and no tax, so that was kinda nice.  8-)

Red

Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on December 28, 2006, 09:57:35 AM
Quote
 Also, I got them with free shipping and no tax, so that was kinda nice.  8-)
Red

Thanks for the leg work.  Sounds like they'll be great.

Is the shipping a regular offer or something you got special?

Rog
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Fired00d on December 28, 2006, 10:04:43 AM
Quote
........  

Hopefully, this will help your decision on which way to go.  They aren't cheap antennas, but with the excellent quality of J&M headsets I've gotten from them, I'm sure the antennas will be worth the cost and will probably work as advertised.  Also, I got them with free shipping and no tax, so that was kinda nice.  8-)

Red

Red,
Also noticed that they recommend one style for tourpak mount (HRUP-ATM (http://www.jmcorp.com/ProductDetail.asp?PF=6&ProductID=HRUP-ATM)), and one for rail mount (HRUP-ARL (http://www.jmcorp.com/ProductDetail.asp?PF=6&ProductID=HRUP-ARL)). I'm currently using a rubber duckie antenna that will work for both (no tourpak, w/tourpak). Do you know what the difference is, and do you really need to get both if you switch back and forth (no tourpak, w/tourpak)?

 [smiley=pumpkin.gif]
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 [smiley=fireman.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on December 28, 2006, 10:13:31 AM
Quote
Red,
 I'm currently using a [highlight]rubber duckie antenna  [/highlight][smiley=pumpkin.gif]
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 [smiley=fireman.gif]

Nice antenna d00d [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]  But why does your rubber duckie need an antenna?
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on December 28, 2006, 10:49:26 AM
Quote

Thanks for the leg work.  Sounds like they'll be great.

Is the shipping a regular offer or something you got special?

Rog

The free shipping is a standard thing, as long as you use UPS ground or Parcel Post.  

Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on December 28, 2006, 10:51:58 AM
Quote

Nice antenna d00d [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]  But why does your rubber duckie need an antenna?
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!  Now I have to buy a new keyboard.  I just spewed Pepsi all over it!!!!!  [smiley=ROFLOL.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on December 28, 2006, 10:56:15 AM
Quote
Red,
Also noticed that they recommend one style for tourpak mount (HRUP-ATM (http://www.jmcorp.com/ProductDetail.asp?PF=6&ProductID=HRUP-ATM)), and one for rail mount (HRUP-ARL (http://www.jmcorp.com/ProductDetail.asp?PF=6&ProductID=HRUP-ARL)). I'm currently using a rubber duckie antenna that will work for both (no tourpak, w/tourpak). Do you know what the difference is, and do you really need to get both if you switch back and forth (no tourpak, w/tourpak)?

 [smiley=pumpkin.gif]
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 [smiley=fireman.gif]
d00d,
I'm not familiar with the rail-mount system for the HD's, as all I've ever had is EG's with tour paks, so that's the only mount that I'm familiar with.   What's different between the rail mount and the tour pak mount as far as where the antenna actually mounts to?  I know that the base is obviously different, as one mounts to the rail and the other is mounted to the tour pak, but do both setups use the same factory whip that screws on and then has a set screw.  I dunno   [smiley=nixweiss.gif]
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Fired00d on December 28, 2006, 10:57:45 AM
Quote
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!  Now I have to buy a new keyboard.  I just spewed Pepsi all over it!!!!!  [smiley=ROFLOL.gif]
Heh, you laughing at my duckie??? :o That is one kewl a$$ duckie I'll have you know. 8-) [smiley=huepfenlol2.gif]

 [smiley=pumpkin.gif]
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 [smiley=fireman.gif]

(http://flhrsei.org/yabb2/Attachments/d00dduck.jpg)
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Fired00d on December 28, 2006, 11:01:40 AM
Quote
d00d,
I'm not familiar with the rail-mount system for the HD's, as all I've ever had is EG's with tour paks, so that's the only mount that I'm familiar with.   What's different between the rail mount and the tour pak mount as far as where the antenna actually mounts to?  I know that the base is obviously different, as one mounts to the rail and the other is mounted to the tour pak, but do both setups use the same factory whip that screws on and then has a set screw.  I dunno   [smiley=nixweiss.gif]
Red
The bases are both the same. You have an adapter that is included w/the antennae relocation kit, but the antennae bases are the same. Only thing that I can think that may be different is in that pic of the rail mount it looks to be on a Street Glide that system may be different. [smiley=confused5.gif]

 [smiley=pumpkin.gif]
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 [smiley=fireman.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on December 28, 2006, 11:04:30 AM
Quote
Heh, you laughing at my duckie??? :o That is one kewl a$$ duckie I'll have you know. 8-) [smiley=huepfenlol2.gif]

(http://flhrsei.org/yabb2/Attachments/d00dduck.jpg)

Cool duckie d00d, but I'm a little curious about where the antenna was mounted.  [smiley=nervous.gif] Could explain the big grin on the duck [smiley=oops.gif]
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on December 28, 2006, 11:09:00 AM
Quote
The bases are both the same.... Only thing that I can think that may be different is in that pic of the rail mount it looks to be on a Street Glide that system may be different. [smiley=confused5.gif]

You'd probably get away with buying the "ATM" version then, as it's a direct fit, (no additional adapters), screw on to the standard HD mount.  If you can use the same factory whip on the different mounts, you should be able to use the same J&M antenna.  Fortunately, they sell them in onesies and not in pairs.

Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Fired00d on December 28, 2006, 11:09:38 AM
Quote

Cool duckie d00d, but I'm a little curious about where the antenna was mounted.  [smiley=nervous.gif] Could explain the big grin on the duck [smiley=oops.gif]
Red
Shhhhhh.... :-X [smiley=lipsrsealed.gif] [smiley=lipsrsealed2.gif] You are going to embarrass her :-[ you weren't supposed to notice that. :o [smiley=huepfenjump3.gif]

You didn't expect a grown man that has a rubber duckie to have a male duckie did you? [smiley=confused5.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif]

 [smiley=pumpkin.gif]
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 [smiley=fireman.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on December 28, 2006, 11:42:31 AM
Quote
Shhhhhh.... :-X [smiley=lipsrsealed.gif] [smiley=lipsrsealed2.gif] You are going to [highlight]embarrass her [/highlight]:-[ you weren't supposed to notice that. :o [smiley=huepfenjump3.gif]
You didn't expect a grown man that has a rubber duckie to have a male duckie did you? [smiley=confused5.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif]
 [smiley=pumpkin.gif]Ride Safe,Fired00d [smiley=fireman.gif]

For a minute there I thought you had made an [highlight]ass[/highlight]umption but I see you spend enough tiime in the tub to know when to bail your own a$$ out!
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Fired00d on December 28, 2006, 11:57:59 AM
Quote

For a minute there I thought you had made an [highlight]ass[/highlight]umption but I see you spend enough tiime in the tub to know when to bail your own a$$ out!
Well it's either bail or come out smelling/looking clean, either way I have to stay on my game around you guys. ;) ;D

 [smiley=pumpkin.gif]
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 [smiley=fireman.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on December 28, 2006, 08:30:39 PM
Quote
Well it's either bail or come out smelling/looking clean, either way I have to stay on my game around you guys. ;) ;D

 [smiley=pumpkin.gif]
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 [smiley=fireman.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Fired00d on December 28, 2006, 08:34:03 PM
Quote
Chithead!!!! :P [smiley=huepfenlol2.gif]

 [smiley=pumpkin.gif]
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 [smiley=fireman.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Bagger on December 28, 2006, 08:34:33 PM
Now that's some funny chit right there!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D [smiley=apple.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on December 28, 2006, 09:22:22 PM
Quote
Chithead!!!! :P [smiley=huepfenlol2.gif]

 [smiley=pumpkin.gif]
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 [smiley=fireman.gif]

Hey, sticks and stones..........did you see I got you some color matched (nearly) tape to replace the old grey duck tape holding that old saddle bag from eBay together?

Feel the love anyway, who else could I mess with that sets up these great one liners anyway?

Happy New Year Gary ::) [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Fired00d on December 28, 2006, 09:35:55 PM
Quote

Hey, sticks and stones..........did you see I got you some color matched (nearly) tape to replace the old grey duck tape holding that old saddle bag from eBay together?

Feel the love anyway, who else could I mess with that sets up these great one liners anyway?

Happy New Year Gary ::) [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Yea, I saw that, thanks for at least color coordinating the tape. ::) ;D

Happy New Year to you also.

 [smiley=pumpkin.gif]
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 [smiley=fireman.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: magicl1 on December 29, 2006, 06:31:10 PM
Quote

I ordered a set of J&M shorties on the 22nd.  They are supposed to be here on the 2nd.  According to their add, they are pre-tuned for the CB and don't require any further adjustments.  I'll break out my SWR meter to verify that after I install them.  I have a set of Cycle Whips on right now.  They are about 14 inches long, but are questionalble for use with the CB.  Their web site doesn't say anything about it, but others say you can and some say you can't.  So I'm not taking the chance and will take them off when the J&M's come in.  I also like the fact that the J&M's use the set-screw like the stock antennas do.  Hopefully, they'll work great.  I'll post a pic and test results after I get them.

Red
As with others, I will be interested in your report.  I purchased Freedoms and made up the SWR meter over a year ago.  I could never get below 3.0+ on any channel.  Opted to throw them into the top of my tool chest rather than fry the CB.  The stock ones were not much better but figured if the radio goes bad it's HD's problem and not mine with the freedom replacements.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on December 29, 2006, 11:44:39 PM
Quote
As with others, I will be interested in your report.  I purchased Freedoms and made up the SWR meter over a year ago.  I could never get below 3.0+ on any channel.  Opted to throw them into the top of my tool chest rather than fry the CB.  The stock ones were not much better but figured if the radio goes bad it's HD's problem and not mine with the freedom replacements.

They are supposedly coming, according to UPS, Tuesday.  I'll be picking my bike up from the dealership on Wednesday and hope to have them installed Wednesday afternoon and take it out to do an SWR check.  If I get what the antenna's engineer told me he pre-tuned them for, I'll be pretty happy with them...he said he errored on the high side to allow some adjustment.  He stated that you can tune the antenna so that 1 and 40 will be the same, about 2.2:1 and that channel 19 or 20 would be right at about 1.2:1, so that's encouraging.  I may not even mess with them if I get what he says they should be at coming from the factory.  He stated that even pre-tuned to what he designed them for, they are much better than the stock whips.  I never checked mine, but he said the stocks are terribly mis-tuned.

Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on December 29, 2006, 11:56:39 PM
Gary, very nice pic.  I am a bit diappointed however that you didn't use the "house of thong" or the "rubber duckie antenna" pics. ::)
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Fired00d on December 30, 2006, 12:03:24 AM
Quote
Gary, very nice pic.  I am a bit diappointed however that you didn't use the "house of thong" or the "rubber duckie antenna" pics. ::)
You mean you don't like my new avatar for the New Year Celebration???? [smiley=nixweiss.gif] [smiley=huepfenlol2.gif]

Enjoy it, because it's only temporary.

 [smiley=pumpkin.gif]
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 [smiley=fireman.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on December 30, 2006, 12:44:13 AM
Quote
You mean you don't like my new avatar for the New Year Celebration???? [smiley=nixweiss.gif] [smiley=huepfenlol2.gif]
Enjoy it, because it's only temporary.
 [smiley=pumpkin.gif]Ride Safe,Fired00d
 [smiley=fireman.gif]

It seems it should last at least through the surgery [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: tommyo on January 01, 2007, 01:50:14 PM
I was just going to make a post on this topic... I would be interested in some feed back on the shorties! I also would like to know if you can add an amp to the stock system on a '06 ultra classic?
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on January 01, 2007, 02:26:21 PM
Quote
I was just going to make a post on this topic... I would be interested in some feed back on the shorties! I also would like to know if you can add an amp to the stock system on a '06 ultra classic?

You most likely want to check out Hawg Wired.

There site makes this note:
 PSC3004 Harley-Davidson Applications [From Amplifiers]

Note: Stock 1998-2006 [highlight]Harley-Davidson speakers utilize 2 ohm or 8 ohm voice coils[/highlight]. [highlight]Due to the 4 ohm speaker output of our amplifiers (and most other aftermarket amplifiers), they should not be connected directly to stock speakers[/highlight]. Failure to follow this guideline can cause damage to your amplifier and/or speakers, and void your warranty.
Note: Tour-Pak speaker pods or custom speaker mounting required to utilize 4 channels.

This links to the page for Harley applications, many here have up graded both amp and speakers for great performance:

http://hawg-wired.com/tech_fitment.php?xPath=tfit&osCsid=b90f050348509ebcd7df277cd2932802

And here are threads:
http://flhrsei.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?num=1161307702/7#7

http://flhrsei.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?num=1148998703/0

You may want to check with hd-dude in a PM, he has done many installs.


Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on January 03, 2007, 03:40:19 PM
Quote

They are supposedly coming, according to UPS, Tuesday.  I'll be picking my bike up from the dealership on Wednesday and hope to have them installed Wednesday afternoon and take it out to do an SWR check.  If I get what the antenna's engineer told me he pre-tuned them for, I'll be pretty happy with them...he said he errored on the high side to allow some adjustment.  He stated that you can tune the antenna so that 1 and 40 will be the same, about 2.2:1 and that channel 19 or 20 would be right at about 1.2:1, so that's encouraging.  I may not even mess with them if I get what he says they should be at coming from the factory.  He stated that even pre-tuned to what he designed them for, they are much better than the stock whips.  I never checked mine, but he said the stocks are terribly mis-tuned.

Red

I would be interested in some feed back on the J&M antenna before I buy these.
Thanks
Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 03, 2007, 03:45:33 PM
Quote

I would be interested in some feed back on the J&M antenna before I buy these.
Thanks
Jacques
The antennas came in via UPS last night.  Unfortunately, the Jester is hung up at the dealership, (seems they overbooked the dyno and didn't tell me), so the earliest I'll be able to pick my bike up is Saturday.  I hope to have them mounted and tested then and will provide a report (w/pics) shortly thereafter.  Initial impression of the antennas is that they are very well made rigid shorties and are a direct replacement (no mods required) for the factory whips.  They even include a set screw just like the factory antennas.  More to follow.... :)
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: hogheritage04 on January 03, 2007, 04:11:17 PM
Red,

 As with many here on the forum, I am VERY interested in your report on the performance of these J&M antennas.  I have bought from J&M before, and have nothing but good to say about them, their customer service and their quality.  We use the CBs alot when on group rides for our Road Captains Lead and Sweep, so I don't want my CB to be degraded.  My understanding of how the CB works is "Line-of-Sight".  So if this is true, it would seem that the taller the antenna, the longer the reception.  Let us know, once you get the antennas on if not only the power is the same, but also the distance.  Sure appreciate all the feedback as it saves the rest of us from experimenting.  Can't wait to see the pics and your performance report.  Happy New Year and thanks. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 04, 2007, 08:38:44 PM
Quote
Red,

 As with many here on the forum, I am VERY interested in your report on the performance of these J&M antennas.  I have bought from J&M before, and have nothing but good to say about them, their customer service and their quality.  We use the CBs alot when on group rides for our Road Captains Lead and Sweep, so I don't want my CB to be degraded.  [highlight]My understanding of how the CB works is "Line-of-Sight".[/highlight]  So if this is true, it would seem that the taller the antenna, the longer the reception.  Let us know, once you get the antennas on if not only the power is the same, but also the distance.  Sure appreciate all the feedback as it saves the rest of us from experimenting.  Can't wait to see the pics and your performance report.  Happy New Year and thanks. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Latest update, the Jester is down until I get back from Arizona on the 15th.  They had to order a part (fairing seal) that won't be in for about 5 days.  By that time I'll be out of town ... so they are going to keep the bike until I get back.  I promise I'll put out a report on the antennas...sorry for the wait. :(  

CB radios operate at 27MHz, which is the high end of the HF band.  You're somewhat correct about CB's being line of site, but not because of the propagation characteristics of HF.  HF is a great "long-haul" frequency band.  In fact, it's not uncommon to skip (talk) many hundreds of miles with a CB radio.  You're limited to distance because of power.  By FCC rules, maximum power for a CB is 4 Watts, and the more detuned your antenna is the lower your Effective Radiated Power (ERP) is.  Many things play into lower or higher ERP.  The amount of line loss, connectors, and yes, length of antenna.  The closer you can get to a true quarter-wave antenna, the better.  However, a straight quarter-wave antenna for 27 MHz is 18 ft long.  Totally impractical for any mobile unit.  So antenna manufacturers, make shorter antennas that fool the radio into thinking it is a quarter-wave antenna, buy doing copper wrapping, (such as the J&M shorties), loading coils, or electronically fooling the radio with an antenna coupler.   If you have a perfect 1:1 SWR and an antenna with 0db gain, you're probably still going to have a signal loss of about 2-3 db because of the connector on the back of the radio, coax length, and the connector at the antenna, so your ERP would actually be lower than the rated 4 watts.  Sorry to ramble on about this...I've been a comm guy for a long time...and I get a little carried away sometime... [smiley=soapbox.gif]
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on January 04, 2007, 08:43:42 PM
Quote
Latest update, the Jester is down until I get back from Arizona on the 15th.  They had to order a part (fairing seal) that won't be in for about 5 days.  By that time I'll be out of town ... so they are going to keep the bike until I get back.  I promise I'll put out a report on the antennas...sorry for the wait. :(  

CB radios operate at 27MHz, which is the high end of the HF band.  You're somewhat correct about CB's being line of site, but not because of the propagation characteristics of HF.  HF is a great "long-haul" frequency band.  In fact, it's not uncommon to skip (talk) many hundreds of miles with a CB radio.  You're limited to distance because of power.  By FCC rules, maximum power for a CB is 4 Watts, and the more detuned your antenna is the lower your Effective Radiated Power (ERP) is.  Many things play into lower or higher ERP.  The amount of line loss, connectors, and yes, length of antenna.  The closer you can get to a true quarter-wave antenna, the better.  However, a straight quarter-wave antenna for 27 MHz is 18 ft long.  Totally impractical for any mobile unit.  So antenna manufacturers, make shorter antennas that fool the radio into thinking it is a quarter-wave antenna, buy doing copper wrapping, (such as the J&M shorties), loading coils, or electronically fooling the radio with an antenna coupler.   If you have a perfect 1:1 SWR and an antenna with 0db gain, you're probably still going to have a signal loss of about 2-3 db because of the connector on the back of the radio, coax length, and the connector at the antenna, so your ERP would actually be lower than the rated 4 watts.  Sorry to ramble on about this...I've been a comm guy for a long time...and I get a little carried away sometime... [smiley=soapbox.gif]
Red

It's great to hear what/how this works, I have heard a million explanations over the years from the guy that stayed at the Holiday Inn Express lsst night.

We'll hang on until you get it back.  Hope it is as good as their other stuff.

Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 04, 2007, 11:26:30 PM
Quote

It's great to hear what/how this works, I have heard a million explanations over the years from the guy that stayed at the Holiday Inn Express lsst night.

We'll hang on until you get it back.  Hope it is as good as their other stuff.

Thanks for the patience.  :)  Like I stated earlier, they appear to be of excellent quality.  I've had previous experience with J&M products and have always been totally pleased with them.  I didn't hesitate to buy them when I saw that they were now offering shorty antennas.  If they work like their other products they will work as advertised, or as their designer told me they will work.  I'll be really surprised if they don't.
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on January 05, 2007, 07:58:09 AM
I'll wait your report, it's not a problem.
We'll hang till you get it back.

And J&M will wait later for my order.
They are nice guys and excellent contact with John.

Regards
Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: hogheritage04 on January 05, 2007, 02:22:24 PM
Red,

 Thanks for the detailed explanation.  I found it very educational, and explained a lot about why/how the CB really works.  So, when you get back we will all be waiting to hear your report.  Please post some pics with the new antennas so we can see what they look like on the bike.  Until you report back....
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: magicl1 on January 06, 2007, 12:29:17 PM
Quote
Sorry to ramble on about this...I've been a comm guy for a long time...and I get a little carried away sometime... [smiley=soapbox.gif] [smiley=welcome_005.gif]
Red

I would not worry about the Soap Box!  Good stuff!  It's always interesting to read about how this works!

Since you have a good understanding, do you have any suggestions for a portable CB unit?  The wife and I head up to the White Mountains for the weekend here in AZ (she takes the car with the 2 dogs and our cat) and I have the dirty job of riding the Motor Cycle up ( [smiley=huepfenjump3.gif] ).  It would be nice to comunicate between vehicles, but I do not want anything that is hard wired or permanent.

Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 06, 2007, 05:36:02 PM
Quote

I would not worry about the Soap Box!  Good stuff!  It's always interesting to read about how this works!

Since you have a good understanding, do you have any suggestions for a portable CB unit?  The wife and I head up to the White Mountains for the weekend here in AZ (she takes the car with the 2 dogs and our cat) and I have the dirty job of riding the Motor Cycle up ( [smiley=huepfenjump3.gif] ).  It would be nice to comunicate between vehicles, [highlight]but I do not want anything that is hard wired or permanent[/highlight].


Cobra still makes, I believe, and GE used to make, a really nice, what they called Emergency CB unit.  Which sounds like exactly what you're looking for.  The whole unit with magnetic telescoping antenna, came in a nice plastic case and you could just throw the unit in the trunk or under the seat, when you weren't using it.  To use it all you have to do is plug the radio into the cigarette lighter and put the mag mount antenna on the roof and start transmitting...great little portable rig.  Here's a link for a GE unit:  http://auctions.yahoo.com/i:cb%20portable%20GE%20CB%2040%20channel%20radio%20model%203-5920:93081381  There are still plenty of CBs out there.  If you want a hand-held walkie-talkie type, just do a Google search on portable CB radios or hand held CB radios and you'll get a bunch of hits....hope this helps.
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 15, 2007, 02:23:01 PM
As promised, here's some pics of the J&M shorty antenna mounted on my Jester.  The antenna connector in the tour pack is of a funky design that I've never seen before for a CB...so I have to see if I can get parts to make a cable to run between my meter and the antenna connector.  I don't feel like taking off the fairing to see if the connector on the radio is the same as the tour pak or a standard PL-259 connector that most CBs have.  I put the antennas on the bike and tried them out...the reception is definitely better, than the factory antennas.  I could barely pick up the truckers off of I-95 (about two miles from my house) with the factory antennas and the bike sitting in the garage.  They were "booming" in after putting the J&M's on.  I did a radio check with one of the truckers and he stated that I sounded great and was coming in "loud and clear".  Never got that from a trucker before on my HD CB's with the stock whips.  So I'm getting out at least 2 miles.  I noticed, that the "noise floor" was higher with these antennas, then with the stock antennas, which resulted in having to raise the squelch a bar or two. That signifies that they are pulling the signal better than the stock one.   Granted this is all very non-technical way of testing the antennas, but without the proper connectors, I can't put the meter in line to do a calibration.  Bottom line, I think that even without taking any measurements, they are better than stock.  They are semi-rigid, so they won't have that bent appearance like the rubber duckies do after riding for awhile, but yet are flexible enough that if you bump into them, they won't snap.  They appear to be well made, and they mount right on to the stock mount with no adapters and then are secured with an allen set screw, just like the factory antennas.   Very nice setup...I'm glad I got them.
Cheers  [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red  
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 15, 2007, 02:23:38 PM
another of the antennas from the side.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on January 15, 2007, 02:56:44 PM
Thanks for your report, RedDevil ! [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
You confirm the first impression.
Now, I'll send my order. :)

Thanks for your tests and your help.

Regards
Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on January 15, 2007, 03:00:54 PM
Yep, thanks for the report, I hope you can get your meter on them in the future and let us know what you think.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ESJ JESTER on January 15, 2007, 03:41:20 PM
It is not a standard PL-259 on the radio either.....
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on January 15, 2007, 03:43:22 PM
Quote
It is not a standard PL-259 on the radio either.....

Dang...........
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 15, 2007, 03:48:14 PM
Quote
It is not a standard PL-259 on the radio either.....
Wonderful  >:(, that's what I was afraid of.  I wonder why they went with that odd-ball connector? [smiley=nixweiss.gif] Just another way that the MoCo marches to their own drummer.  :-/ Would have made life a lot easier if they had gone with industry standard connectors.
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on January 15, 2007, 04:19:06 PM
Quote
It is not a standard PL-259 on the radio either.....
Looks the same but smaller.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on January 15, 2007, 04:25:49 PM
Red, thanks for the report.  Antennas look good.  How is AM/FM reception (not that I listen much).

BTW, here are Radio Shack parts you need to hook up SWR meter in tour pak.  I copied this from a thread from early last year.  I got these parts and they work but not every store will have them.  My store did an inventory search and sent me to another store that did have them.  Not popular parts and clerk had difficulty finding them.  May not be in online parts catalog either.

To do this at the Tour Pak:
 
You need:
quanity of 2 - part# 278-968    
quanity of 1 - part# 278-208C    
quanity of 1 - part# 274-710A  
quanity of 1 - SWR Meter
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 15, 2007, 04:50:40 PM
Quote
Red, thanks for the report.  Antennas look good.  How is AM/FM reception (not that I listen much).

BTW, here are Radio Shack parts you need to hook up SWR meter in tour pak.  I copied this from a thread from early last year.  I got these parts and they work but not every store will have them.  My store did an inventory search and sent me to another store that did have them.  Not popular parts and clerk had difficulty finding them.  May not be in online parts catalog either.

To do this at the Tour Pak:
 
You need:
quanity of 2 - part# 278-968    
quanity of 1 - part# 278-208C    
quanity of 1 - part# 274-710A  
quanity of 1 - SWR Meter
Outstanding Ultra!!! :D  Thanks for the part numbers...hopefully, I will find them.  We have a couple of RS's around here.  Sorry I forgot to mention FM reception...I did a quick scan of DC Stations that are about 50+ miles away and they sounded almost as good as the local stations.  I would say a little better in reception over the stock whips and a 10-fold increase over the rubber-duckies (Cycle Whips) that I had before.  
Cheers  [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: magicl1 on January 16, 2007, 10:32:25 AM
Quote
BTW, here are Radio Shack parts you need to hook up SWR meter in tour pak.  I copied this from a thread from early last year.  I got these parts and they work but not every store will have them.  My store did an inventory search and sent me to another store that did have them.  Not popular parts and clerk had difficulty finding them.  May not be in online parts catalog either.
Ultra, the same thing happened to me.  I ended up going to 3 different RS stores for the parts.  Do you have the link to that old thread handy?  I know I printed the instructions for running the tests, but others may find them interesting to review.
As I recall, I moved the bike out onto the driveway and moved the cars out of the way.  I got very different readings if I left the Tour Pack lid up or down.  After trying to dial in the Freedom's, I gave up as I was not able to pull them down below 3.0.  Took readings from the stock whip and it was just a hair below 3.0.
Here is a picture of the RS set up.  I think the cost was under $40.  Red probably as a meter or two ;) laying around so it won't be so much.

Red, hopefully you will get a chance to make up the "HD Custom" [highlight]testing connection[/highlight].  I will be interested in the reading you obtain if you do.



Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on January 16, 2007, 11:53:25 AM
Quote
Ultra, the same thing happened to me.  I ended up going to 3 different RS stores for the parts.  Do you have the link to that old thread handy?  I know I printed the instructions for running the tests, but others may find them interesting to review.
As I recall, I moved the bike out onto the driveway and moved the cars out of the way.  I got very different readings if I left the Tour Pack lid up or down.  After trying to dial in the Freedom's, I gave up as I was not able to pull them down below 3.0.  Took readings from the stock whip and it was just a hair below 3.0.
Here is a picture of the RS set up.  I think the cost was under $40.  Red probably as a meter or two ;) laying around so it won't be so much.

Red, hopefully you will get a chance to make up the "HD Custom" [highlight]testing connection[/highlight].  I will be interested in the reading you obtain if you do.

Magic, I do not have the old link.  Just did a search for SWR (I think) yesterday and scrolled down until I found the msg with the part numbers.  Did not save the link but you can probably find it the same way. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: arcticdude on January 16, 2007, 11:59:26 AM
here's the original thread- it's kind of long, but good info:

http://flhrsei.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?num=1131460354/0
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on January 16, 2007, 01:30:20 PM
Quote
Thanks for your report, RedDevil ! [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
You confirm the first impression.
Now, I'll send my order. :)

Thanks for your tests and your help.

Regards
Jacques

I'm interested in these too, Jacques, BUT - remember that our radios are on a different set of channels to the domestic bikes!  Best to ask the man at J&M what he thinks, before you start.  As they are adjustable, I'm thinking we should be able to make them work at a decent SWR, but best to check before ordering.

I have an SWR meter somewhere, but of course it has PL259 connectors, and since Radio Shack doesn't exist here, finding the adapters may be difficult...

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on January 16, 2007, 02:24:24 PM
Good evening Jim,

What is different on our bikes ?  [smiley=confused5.gif]
Do You speak about the CB or the radio?
For the CB, we have 40 channels, 4Watts on the 27Mhz band. Is it right ?
Is it not same in the States ?

Please, explain me !

Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on January 16, 2007, 02:36:49 PM
Quote
Good evening Jim,

What is different on our bikes ?  [smiley=confused5.gif]
Do You speak about the CB or the radio?
For the CB, we have 40 channels, 4Watts on the 27Mhz band. Is it right ?
Is it not same in the States ?

Please, explain me !

Jacques

Bonsoir, Jacques! Ça va?

CB - the modulation is FM rather than AM, and the channels are (as far as I know - they certainly used to be, in the UK) on the 27MHz band, yes, but with slightly different frequencies - a tiny bit higher than the US ones. I think, given that there's adjustment, it should be OK, but I've emailed J&M to ask - I'll let you know when they reply!

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on January 16, 2007, 02:46:09 PM
Bonsoir, Jim !

Thanks for these informations.
I'll wait your reply.

Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: magicl1 on January 16, 2007, 04:13:30 PM
A comment cut and pasted from the other thread regarding the "HD Custom" Connection (Radio Shack) requirements
[highlight]"Someone else may have a better way to accomplish this, but here goes.  These are Radio Shack part nos.  You'll need two 278-968 cables.  Cut the end off of one of the cables to install a 274-710 on the cut end, and discard the cutoff coupler, and that's your Motorola female side.  Set it aside.  Take the other cable, and simply screw a 278-208C adapter to one end.  At this point hookup should be self explanatory.  That should do it."[/highlight]

The picture I posted earlier is the end result.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 16, 2007, 05:23:37 PM
Quote
Ultra, the same thing happened to me.  I ended up going to 3 different RS stores for the parts.  Do you have the link to that old thread handy?  I know I printed the instructions for running the tests, but others may find them interesting to review.
As I recall, I moved the bike out onto the driveway and moved the cars out of the way.  I got very different readings if I left the Tour Pack lid up or down.  After trying to dial in the Freedom's, I gave up as I was not able to pull them down below 3.0.  Took readings from the stock whip and it was just a hair below 3.0.
Here is a picture of the RS set up.  I think the cost was under $40.  Red probably as a meter or two ;) laying around so it won't be so much.

Red, hopefully you will get a chance to make up the "HD Custom" [highlight]testing connection[/highlight].  I will be interested in the reading you obtain if you do.
I didn't get a chance to get out to Radio Shack yet, but as soon as I can, I'll try and procure the parts...Looks like a very straight forward setup and the cables should be easy to make.  I have a bunch of spare patch cables with standard PL-259's on them that all I need is the two specific connectors...
Cheers,  [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Screamin_Beagle on January 16, 2007, 08:03:29 PM
One side note here fellas (and our lady members too).  BE Careful of the cables (coax) that runs from the radio to the reciever.  If the cable from the transmitter to the reciever is bent too tight,  cripmed, pinched,  pulled,  freaked up in any way (the standing wave ratio will skyrocket),  you can and will blow the final output amplifier in the transmitter (that's not good......for all you non-tech guys.........lol).  If you put your TP on/off,  make sure you check this carefully.........the cable is cheap (maybe $20....the radio is expensive)....  



_Beagle
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Screamin_Beagle on January 16, 2007, 08:28:08 PM
All,
    ALL CB radio's manufactured in the world are AMPLITUDE MODULATED transmitters (AM).  FREQUENCY MODULATED amplifiers are far more complex and way more expensive to build....therefore not used for the general public (for multi-user tranmission....cost for the transmitter not to mention the corresponding antenna is WAY cost prohibititive).  In either case,  the transmitter HAS to be impedance matched to the antenna (just be glad you don't have to try to hide a wave guide between your tank and frame, especially when your ball bag is right next to it).  As I said earlier.......after impedance matching,  be careful of crimps....bends...pinches....etc.  If you suspect a problem,  get out that $19 SWR meter and correct the issue.  Most antenna's should be tuneable to correct.




_Beagle
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on January 17, 2007, 05:41:45 AM
Quote
All,
    ALL CB radio's manufactured in the world are AMPLITUDE MODULATED transmitters (AM). _Beagle

Sorry, Beagle - this is one area where I DO know what I'm talking about, and I can assure you that over this side of the Atlantic (still in the world!) our CBs are - and have always been, if they were legal - FM.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CB_radio_in_the_United_Kingdom

"...the preferred option for legalisation was the U.S. 27MHz AM system....The final legalised service was a compromise - a band at 27MHz was allocated but using FM and offset channel frequencies 27.60125 - 27.99125 MHz which were incompatible with the U.S. system.  The channels legalised on 2 November 1981 were on two blocks of frequencies: 40 channels on the 27 MHz band and 20 channels on the 934 MHz band, both of which used FM (frequency modulation) ..... In the 1990s 40 additional frequencies were added, which were ironically the same as the U.S. allocation - but again using FM."

While that covers just the UK, quite a number of other countries use FM for CB as well;  the current one in use here is Europe-wide, I believe - still FM!

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 17, 2007, 09:27:47 AM
Quote

Sorry, Beagle - this is one area where I DO know what I'm talking about, and I can assure you that over this side of the Atlantic (still in the world!) our CBs are - and have always been, if they were legal - FM.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CB_radio_in_the_United_Kingdom

"...the preferred option for legalisation was the U.S. 27MHz AM system....The final legalised service was a compromise - a band at 27MHz was allocated but using FM and offset channel frequencies 27.60125 - 27.99125 MHz which were incompatible with the U.S. system.  The channels legalised on 2 November 1981 were on two blocks of frequencies: 40 channels on the 27 MHz band and 20 channels on the 934 MHz band, both of which used FM (frequency modulation) ..... In the 1990s 40 additional frequencies were added, which were ironically the same as the U.S. allocation - but again using FM."

While that covers just the UK, quite a number of other countries use FM for CB as well;  the current one in use here is Europe-wide, I believe - still FM!

Jim
If you're operating in the upper 27 MHz band similar to the US, the factory whips should work...they are supposedly tuned, and I use that term very loosely from how bad the factory whips are, to optimally operate in the band 26.965-27.405 MHz.  Theoretically, the more you go below 26.965 or above 27.405, your SWR will go up as the frequencies go farther away from tuned frequency of the antenna.   When Japan opened up 40 more channels above 27.405, you could still use the same antenna to transmit on, but if you had an antenna tuner, and you planned on using the upper 40 channels, you optimally tuned your antenna for channel 41 for the lowest SWR and then the SWR would increase roughly equal on both sides the farther you got away from channel 41.  Beages is definitely right about kinks and severe bends in the coax cable...that will throw your SWR through the roof and you'll never be able to tune them...

If anyone's interested in some "CB-101", here's a link to a pretty good website:  http://home.att.net/~wizardoz/cbmw/rwpropag.html

Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on January 17, 2007, 09:39:12 AM
Quote
If you're operating in the upper 27 MHz band similar to the US, the factory whips should work...they are supposedly tuned, and I use that term very loosely from how bad the factory whips are, to optimally operate in the band 26.965-27.405 MHz.  Theoretically, the more you go below 26.965 or above 27.405, your SWR will go up as the frequencies go farther away from tuned frequency of the antenna.   When Japan opened up 40 more channels above 27.405, you could still use the same antenna to transmit on, but if you had an antenna tuner, and you planned on using the upper 40 channels, you optimally tuned your antenna for channel 41 for the lowest SWR and then the SWR would increase roughly equal on both sides the farther you got away from channel 41.  Beages is definitely right about kinks and severe bends in the coax cable...that will throw your SWR through the roof and you'll never be able to tune them...
Just my $.02.
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red

Yes, thanks Red - I know all of that stuff, I was an avid (and illegal!) CB enthusiast here in the early 80s, using AM, FM, 120 channels and SSB.  ;) With boots on to work the skip.  Still have most of my equipment, maybe one of these days it will have antique value!  ;D

My question was really just how much adjustment is there in the antennae from J&M, so that a decent SWR around channel 30 (the one we use most) could be attainable. Just had a nice email from John Lazzeroni at J&M, saying: "I am very sorry ,,, I don't have a positive idea on whether or not those
antennas will work for you ,,,,,

We do not have access to 27mhz FM transceivers ,,,,"

But the FM bit won't matter, of course, so it sounds as if they are worth a try!

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 17, 2007, 10:15:34 AM
Quote

Yes, thanks Red - I know all of that stuff, I was an avid (and illegal!) CB enthusiast here in the early 80s, using AM, FM, 120 channels and SSB.  ;) With boots on to work the skip.  Still have most of my equipment, maybe one of these days it will have antique value!  ;D

My question was really just how much adjustment is there in the antennae from J&M, so that a decent SWR around channel 30 (the one we use most) could be attainable. Just had a nice email from John Lazzeroni at J&M, saying: "I am very sorry ,,, I don't have a positive idea on whether or not those
antennas will work for you ,,,,,

We do not have access to 27mhz FM transceivers ,,,,"

But the FM bit won't matter, of course, so it sounds as if they are worth a try!

Jim
When I talked to John Lazzeroni at J&M about tuning the antenna, he told me that to optimally tune it to channel 19 or 20, to unravel about 1-2" of copper wire off of the top.  So I would guess that if you would unravel and cut off about 2-3 inches, you would be closer to channel 30.  As you know, going higher in frequency, you need to make the antenna physically shorter, or at least make the radio think it's physically shorter.   For liability reasons, he had to give you that answer, but you should be good to go if you tune them the way I just mentioned.  Just unravel a little at a time, cut it off and see how it goes.  Remember, you have two antennas to play with to get it right.  
I had a few of those 80 channel CB radios  with some "foot warmers" that I used back in my heavy skip shooting days.[smiley=nervous.gif].  

cheers  [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on January 17, 2007, 10:43:52 AM
Quote
When I talked to John Lazzeroni at J&M about tuning the antenna, he told me that to optimally tune it to channel 19 or 20, to unravel about 1-2" of copper wire off of the top.  So I would guess that if you would unravel and cut off about 2-3 inches, you would be closer to channel 30.  As you know, going higher in frequency, you need to make the antenna physically shorter, or at least make the radio think it's physically shorter.   For liability reasons, he had to give you that answer, but you should be good to go if you tune them the way I just mentioned.  Just unravel a little at a time, cut it off and see how it goes.  Remember, you have two antennas to play with to get it right.  
I had a few of those 80 channel CB radios  with some "foot warmers" that I used back in my heavy skip shooting days.[smiley=nervous.gif].  

cheers  [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red

Thanks Red.  Worth a try for sure. The BIG problem is going to be the adapters from PL259 down to these little things, so I can plug in my SWR meter....

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: arcticdude on January 17, 2007, 12:01:04 PM
The parts previously listed from "Radio Crap" will make the meter hookup simple.  Just plug/play.  For those of you with knowledge, we have an 06 and an 07.  (we can't eat, but we can ride.)  The 06 needed about 2" taken off the CB antenna to get great swr readings.  The 07 can't get off of the 3 point after about 4" taken off, though it's now on the low side of 3 rather than the high side when I started.  The meter was put into the tourpak junction on both bikes, both sat in almost the exact same physical location (bike and meter), yet I've got wildly different swr readings.  What should I do next?  I've thought about buying the FM antenna, since it's longer and restart with it.  I'm not sure the dealer is capable of doing anymore than I am. Do I need to go to the back of the radio to see if the cable has a problem- and how does going there, if I'm still using the same antenna/cable on the bike, make any difference?

arctic
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on January 17, 2007, 12:18:17 PM
Quote
The parts previously listed from "Radio Crap" will make the meter hookup simple.  

Yup, they sure would, Arcticdude!  (If we had Radio Shark here in the wilds of Scotland!)  [smiley=huepfenjump3.gif]

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 17, 2007, 12:29:08 PM
Quote
The parts previously listed from "Radio Crap" will make the meter hookup simple.  Just plug/play.  For those of you with knowledge, we have an 06 and an 07.  (we can't eat, but we can ride.)  The 06 needed about 2" taken off the CB antenna to get great swr readings.  The 07 can't get off of the 3 point after about 4" taken off, though it's now on the low side of 3 rather than the high side when I started.  The meter was put into the tourpak junction on both bikes, both sat in almost the exact same physical location (bike and meter), yet I've got wildly different swr readings.  What should I do next?  I've thought about buying the FM antenna, since it's longer and restart with it.  I'm not sure the dealer is capable of doing anymore than I am. Do I need to go to the back of the radio to see if the cable has a problem- and how does going there, if I'm still using the same antenna/cable on the bike, make any difference?

arctic
Arctic,
If you go to the back of the radio and get the same SWR readings, chances are it could be your coax is pinched, kinked, or bent badly...a simple check would be to connect your meter to the back of the radio, then make about an 8 ft cable (approximate length of factory coax from radio to tour pak), with the appropriate plugs on it and run it from your meter to the connector in the tour pak.  If you get better SWR readings, then you have a bad coax run on your bike.  Better still if you make the cable the same length as the factory cable, then if your coax is bad, you can replace it with the one you made, by simply adding the smaller connector to the other end and attaching that to the radio.    Don't use the factory FM antenna, if you notice, it's not the same as the factory CB antenna.  I would suggest buying aftermarket antennas, such as the J&M shorties.

cheers  [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Screamin_Beagle on January 17, 2007, 02:01:23 PM
Thanks for the correction fellas..........ya learn something new everyday!!!!  


_Beagle
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Screamin_Beagle on January 17, 2007, 02:07:18 PM
Now you have me hooked,  does anyone know what the max output power on the FM radio's (CB's) was????  At least the legal output......I remember as a kid we would take them apart and well.....at that time we would "PEAK" the output amp to get as much power as possible.  Depending on the radio electronics we could usually get 12-14 watts (big improvement from the standard 4 watts).  Holly sh$t,  I just figured out when this whole "take a perfectly working device and make it work better" thing started for me....I gotta call my shrink....I think I just had a breakthrough!!!! ;D ;D


_Beagle
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: arcticdude on January 18, 2007, 10:26:18 AM
Isn't the mast the same between the FM and the CB antenna, only the spring/coil different.  You can loosen the allen screw and swap the actual masts themselves.  THat's what I was referring to about using the FM antenna.  That way I could start with a longer mast to then cut down.  I'm was thinking that I needed a slightly longer length to match the swr; but now realize I probably have a bad/bent/pinched cable.  Makes sense, given the rigorous QC our bikes go through. >:(

Eqcons, if you have trouble finding the stuff local, let me know and I will mail it to you at cost.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: hogheritage04 on January 18, 2007, 02:03:52 PM
Red,

  Thanks for the update.  Bike looks great with those new antennas.  I guess the bottom line question for those of us who are not as technical as some of you, do these antennas work better than the stock if you were to just hook them up and not worry about the SWR issues?  Thanks again for all you work and reports.  Look forward to your response.  
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 18, 2007, 03:02:15 PM
Quote
Red,

  Thanks for the update.  Bike looks great with those new antennas.  I guess the bottom line question for those of us who are not as technical as some of you, do these antennas work better than the stock if you were to just hook them up and not worry about the SWR issues?  Thanks again for all you work and reports.  Look forward to your response.  
Hog,
Without actually doing an SWR check, I couldn't honestly tell you if they are better.  But if performance of my radio with the new antennas on is any indication, then, yes they are superior to the factory whips.  According to the engineer at J&M that designed them, they will out-perform the stock whips out of the bag without any tweaking.  He said that it's amazing that the factory puts those badly tuned antennas on their bikes.  I have to agree, compared to the J&M in just observable performance, they lack a lot.   Plus the shorties are much more pleasant to look at.    (I guess I should put a disclaimer in here because I like these antennas so much.   I am not associated with J&M, nor am I getting anything in return for the comments that I make here, or any sales that may arise from my comments.)
cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red  
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 18, 2007, 03:07:18 PM
Quote
Isn't the mast the same between the FM and the CB antenna, only the spring/coil different.  You can loosen the allen screw and swap the actual masts themselves.  THat's what I was referring to about using the FM antenna.  That way I could start with a longer mast to then cut down.  I'm was thinking that I needed a slightly longer length to match the swr; but now realize I probably have a bad/bent/pinched cable.  Makes sense, given the rigorous QC our bikes go through. >:(

Eqcons, if you have trouble finding the stuff local, let me know and I will mail it to you at cost.
Arctic,
I had a brain-fart... [smiley=confused5.gif], I was assuming you were just going to replace the whole antenna, not just the upper whip...yes, you should be able to do that with no problems...I don't know how badly those antennas are tuned, so I don't know if you need to go longer or shorter.  I hope that fixes your problem, but if you weren't getting any noticeable, either up or down, when you were trimming the antenna, it's probably not the antenna, but the coax run...it may be pinched somewhere leading up to to the fairing.  If you're not an RF tech when you're assemblying a vehicle, which I'm positive none of the CVO boys at the factory are, you're not going to pay attention to something like a kink...good luck.
cheers,  [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 18, 2007, 03:07:51 PM
Quote
Isn't the mast the same between the FM and the CB antenna, only the spring/coil different.  You can loosen the allen screw and swap the actual masts themselves.  THat's what I was referring to about using the FM antenna.  That way I could start with a longer mast to then cut down.  I'm was thinking that I needed a slightly longer length to match the swr; but now realize I probably have a bad/bent/pinched cable.  Makes sense, given the rigorous QC our bikes go through. >:(

Eqcons, if you have trouble finding the stuff local, let me know and I will mail it to you at cost.
Arctic,
I had a brain-fart... [smiley=confused5.gif], I was assuming you were just going to replace the whole antenna, not just the upper whip...yes, you should be able to do that with no problems...I don't know how badly those antennas are tuned, so I don't know if you need to go longer or shorter.  I hope that fixes your problem, but if you weren't getting any noticeable, either up or down, when you were trimming the antenna, it's probably not the antenna, but the coax run...it may be pinched somewhere leading up to to the fairing.  If you're not an RF tech when you're assemblying a vehicle, which I'm positive none of the CVO boys at the factory are, you're not going to pay attention to something like a kink...good luck.
cheers,  [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: hogheritage04 on January 18, 2007, 03:42:59 PM
Red,

 Thanks for the help.  I've dealt with J & M before, and I agree, they are outstanding people to deal with.  I think I'm going to go ahead and order them and see what happens.  Thanks again for all your help [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: hogheritage04 on January 18, 2007, 03:46:43 PM
Red,

 Can you post again the numbers and price for these antenna from J & M.  Thanks
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on January 18, 2007, 04:09:30 PM
Price : 39.99 $US each

the reference is :
CB or AM/FM Ant Staff Upgrade ‘89-‘07 Harley Trunk Mount ONLY  HRUP-ATM  

http://www.jmcorp.com/ProductDetail.asp?PF=6&ProductID=HRUP-ATM

Regards [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]

Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on January 18, 2007, 07:22:04 PM
Quote
Eqcons, if you have trouble finding the stuff local, let me know and I will mail it to you at cost.

Thanks Arctic.

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on January 18, 2007, 08:21:05 PM
Quote
Price : 39.99 $US each

the reference is :
CB or AM/FM Ant Staff Upgrade ‘89-‘07 Harley Trunk Mount ONLY  HRUP-ATM  

http://www.jmcorp.com/ProductDetail.asp?PF=6&ProductID=HRUP-ATM

Regards [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]

Jacques
Ordered mine from Sierra Electronics -http://www.sierra-mc.com/proddetail.asp?prod=JM%2DHRUP%2DATM - (great folks) for $34 each plus $5.50 for shipping.  Only problem is that when they arrived today it looks like UPS drove their truck over the package.  All torn up.  Can't tell if antennas are damaged but packaging sure is.  Anyway, filed a claim with UPS who called Sierra and they shipped new set today.  Bummer, but I should have them in a couple days.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: magicl1 on January 19, 2007, 08:17:51 AM
Quote
I didn't get a chance to get out to Radio Shack yet, but as soon as I can, I'll try and procure the parts...Looks like a very straight forward setup and the cables should be easy to make.  I have a bunch of spare patch cables with standard PL-259's on them that all I need is the two specific connectors...
Cheers,  [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Red
Red,
Where should one connect the SWR tester for the the best reading? (Tour Trunk or at the radio under the faring?)

I have previously hooked up to the connection in the Tour Trunk.  I just installed the JMC's last night and after the calibration of the meter, I still get a reading well over 3.0.  I did not move the bike out of the garage for the test.  Appreciate your feedback.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on January 19, 2007, 08:30:27 AM
Quote
Red,
Where should one connect the SWR tester for the the best reading? (Tour Trunk or at the radio under the faring?)

I have previously hooked up to the connection in the Tour Trunk.  I just installed the JMC's last night and after the calibration of the meter, I still get a reading well over 3.0.  I did not move the bike out of the garage for the test.  Appreciate your feedback.

Ideally at the radio under the fairing.  There's a post elsewhere covering this ...... hang on...... Yup,

http://flhrsei.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?num=1168552779

Also, in this thread, Red said "If you go to the back of the radio and get the same SWR readings, chances are it could be your coax is pinched, kinked, or bent badly...a simple check would be to connect your meter to the back of the radio, then make about an 8 ft cable (approximate length of factory coax from radio to tour pak), with the appropriate plugs on it and run it from your meter to the connector in the tour pak.  If you get better SWR readings, then you have a bad coax run on your bike.  Better still if you make the cable the same length as the factory cable, then if your coax is bad, you can replace it with the one you made, by simply adding the smaller connector to the other end and attaching that to the radio."

Which is first class advice!

As Red (& Beagle) point out, if the cable back to the TourPak is severely bent or kinked, that will cause a high SWR.

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 19, 2007, 04:38:54 PM
Quote
Ordered mine from Sierra Electronics -http://www.sierra-mc.com/proddetail.asp?prod=JM%2DHRUP%2DATM - (great folks) for $34 each plus $5.50 for shipping.  Only problem is that when they arrived today it looks like UPS drove their truck over the package.  All torn up.  Can't tell if antennas are damaged but packaging sure is.  Anyway, filed a claim with UPS who called Sierra and they shipped new set today.  Bummer, but I should have them in a couple days.
Might as well order them directly from J&M, they have free shipping.  Not to say anything is wrong with Sierra, so no slight on them intended.

Sorry for not getting back to all of the inquiries made to me today.  I've been working, gasp, and have been away from the computer all day.  :(  Thanks to those that picked up the slack for me and posted the part numbers and one of my previous posts.   ;)

Cheers  [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: hogheritage04 on January 19, 2007, 05:32:43 PM
Thanks everyone for the help.  I ordered mine today direct from J&M, and with free shipping.  They should be here next week.  They re-iterated that they should be good to go as soon as I receive them.  I will see how they perform, and if not great, then I will try the extra cable trick.  Thanks again for all the great help and advice.  Here's to the best group of bikers out there!  [smiley=drink.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 19, 2007, 09:22:11 PM
Quote
Thanks everyone for the help.  I ordered mine today direct from J&M, and with free shipping.  They should be here next week.  They re-iterated that they should be good to go as soon as I receive them.  I will see how they perform, and if not great, then I will try the extra cable trick.  Thanks again for all the great help and advice.  Here's to the best group of bikers out there!  [smiley=drink.gif]
Hog,
Good luck and I hope that fixes your SWR problem.  Happy CB'ing and "Catch ya on the flip side, good buddy!" [smiley=earmuffs.gif]
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: magicl1 on January 19, 2007, 09:22:14 PM
Quote

Ideally at the radio under the fairing.  There's a post elsewhere covering this ...... hang on...... Yup,

http://flhrsei.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?num=1168552779

Also, in this thread, Red said "If you go to the back of the radio and get the same SWR readings, chances are it could be your coax is pinched, kinked, or bent badly...a simple check would be to connect your meter to the back of the radio, then make about an 8 ft cable (approximate length of factory coax from radio to tour pak), with the appropriate plugs on it and run it from your meter to the connector in the tour pak.  If you get better SWR readings, then you have a bad coax run on your bike.  Better still if you make the cable the same length as the factory cable, then if your coax is bad, you can replace it with the one you made, by simply adding the smaller connector to the other end and attaching that to the radio."

Which is first class advice!

As Red (& Beagle) point out, if the cable back to the TourPak is severely bent or kinked, that will cause a high SWR.

Jim

Thanks Jim.
I thought I had read something about that.  (short term memory sucks!).  Guess I have to open up the faring to run another check....Hmmm wonder how I am going to explain this to the service writer if I do have a kink in the cable.  They did not know what I was talking  [smiley=nixweiss.gif] about 1 year ago when I suggested they check the SWR on the stock whips (not to say the mechanic would not).
I am getting similar readings on the JMC's as I did from the Freedoms.  (I can start selling antennas very soon on e-bay :-[)


Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on January 22, 2007, 08:46:04 AM
Morning all !

I received my antennas from J&M.
Very fast delivery and excellent packaging.
 [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 22, 2007, 10:24:30 AM
Quote
Morning all !

I received my antennas from J&M.
Very fast delivery and excellent packaging.
 [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Jacques
Jacques,
Be sure to let us know what you think of them after you get them mounted.
cheers  [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on January 22, 2007, 11:07:12 AM
No problem, RedDevil 8-)
Thanks for your attention  [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
My bike is not delivered before April 2007 :(

I hope you'll finish all tests  [smiley=drink.gif]

Best regards
Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: 07SEUC_KC on January 23, 2007, 11:06:24 PM
Well I have spent the last hour reading this thread. Gotta say those J&M people are great. I had the J&M 2003 handlebar mount CB on my RK Custom with problems. My dealer installed it. Their first one. Worked with J&M over the phone and all came out good with a few tweeks. Ended up working better that some HK's that I toured with. Looking forward to get rid of my whips on the new SEUC.

Thanks for all your input    [smiley=huepfenjump3.gif]

MF in KC
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 24, 2007, 04:41:28 AM
Quote
Well I have spent the last hour reading this thread. Gotta say those J&M people are great. I had the J&M 2003 handlebar mount CB on my RK Custom with problems. My dealer installed it. Their first one. Worked with J&M over the phone and all came out good with a few tweeks. Ended up working better that some HK's that I toured with. Looking forward to get rid of my whips on the new SEUC.

Thanks for all your input    [smiley=huepfenjump3.gif]

MF in KC
MF,
Glad that this thread helped you.  You're right, the J&M people are great.  Great tech support and sales.  And they stand behind their product 100%.  You'll like the shorties.  I finally got the parts from Radio Shack to make the patch cable, now just looking for a good day to take the ride out and do an SWR check.
Cheer [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on January 24, 2007, 05:28:00 AM
Morning,

Also, from the other border, I confirm the excellent contact with the J&M people in States. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
If the products are so good than the people, it's fine but we wait the end of the tests from our specialist  ;)

Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on January 24, 2007, 08:53:00 AM
Quote
MF,
Glad that this thread helped you.  You're right, the J&M people are great.  Great tech support and sales.  And they stand behind their product 100%.  You'll like the shorties.  I finally got the parts from Radio Shack to make the patch cable, now just looking for a good day to take the ride out and do an SWR check.
Cheer [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],Red

Looking forward to the numbers Red.  I went ahead an ordered the antennas last night.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 24, 2007, 03:20:52 PM
Quote

Looking forward to the numbers Red.  I went ahead an ordered the antennas last night.
I don't think you'll be disappointed regardless.  They look nice, and by initial non-calibrated performance, perform much better than those gawd-awful factory whips, even on FM/AM/WB.   It's supposed to snow tomorrow, but hopefully, it will clear up by the weekend so I can get out, at least out of the garage and up on the street, and do some measurements.
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on January 24, 2007, 03:33:20 PM
Please Red,

Ride safe, if the road is not fine.

Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 24, 2007, 08:56:10 PM
Quote
Please Red,

Ride safe, if the road is not fine.

Jacques
Jaques,
Thanks for the kind words...not to worry though, the Jester doesn't go out in weather that may be hazardous to either its or my health.
Cheers  [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 25, 2007, 10:50:08 PM
Well guys, I don't have any results for you.  I took the bike out with my new cables and meter today to do an SWR check, and guess what?  The parts that I got from radio shack (the motorola-style connectors), don't work with my 07's connectors!!!!!! They are apparently totally different connectors then the 06 and earlier have...I can't believe that they would change them, but neither plug worked...now I have to try and figure out what type of bastardized plugs they are.  Sorry guys.   :'(

Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on January 25, 2007, 11:22:27 PM
Quote
Well guys, I don't have any results for you.  I took the bike out with my new cables and meter today to do an SWR check, and guess what?  The parts that I got from radio shack (the motorola-style connectors), don't work with my 07's connectors!!!!!! They are apparently totally different connectors then the 06 and earlier have...I can't believe that they would change them, but neither plug worked...now I have to try and figure out what type of bastardized plugs they are.  Sorry guys.   :'(

Red
Red, you are talking about the connectors to use at the antenna connection in the tour pak, right?  If so you must have the wrong Radio Shack parts because they work fine on my '07.  
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 25, 2007, 11:28:38 PM
Quote
Red, you are talking about the connectors to use at the antenna connection in the tour pak, right?  If so you must have the wrong Radio Shack parts because they work fine on my '07.  
Interesting...the parts I got from radio shack were the parts that were listed in this topic.  I had to go to two stores to get them.  Both of them were resealed packs.  I hope I didn't get different parts in the packaging with the right numbers on them.  :-/   Thanks for the info, if you can send me the part numbers, if you still have them, I can compare them to the part numbers I was given.  I don't need the part numbers for the coax cables, I have plenty of spare ones in the basement.  Just the two Motorola-type connectors.  The ones I have, definitely don't work on my bike.
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: magicl1 on January 26, 2007, 08:50:16 AM
Quote
Interesting...the parts I got from radio shack were the parts that were listed in this topic.  I had to go to two stores to get them.  Both of them were resealed packs.  I hope I didn't get different parts in the packaging with the right numbers on them.  :-/   Thanks for the info, if you can send me the part numbers, if you still have them, I can compare them to the part numbers I was given.  I don't need the part numbers for the coax cables, I have plenty of spare ones in the basement.  Just the two Motorola-type connectors.  The ones I have, definitely don't work on my bike.
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red

Would pictures help?  I cropped one of my photos to include just the connectors.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on January 26, 2007, 09:06:08 AM
Quote

Would pictures help?  I cropped one of my photos to include just the connectors.

Magic, you know they always help.......... [smiley=worthless.gif]

Good job [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on January 26, 2007, 09:23:56 AM
Quote

Would pictures help?  I cropped one of my photos to include just the connectors.
Thanks magic.  I had not had time to do this for Red.  But these are the parts you need for sure. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]

From Radio Shack website:  

UHF-to-Motorola-Type Scanner Adapter  
Model: 278-208  |  Catalog #: 278-208  

This scanner adapter accepts a PL-259 UHF-type plug and fits a Motorola-type socket. Connects to ant...


Solderless Motorola-Type Inline Jack
Model: 274-710  |  Catalog #: 274-710

This Motorola-type jack accepts antennas made for many scanners and car radios.  
 
 

  
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 26, 2007, 10:08:05 AM
Quote
Thanks magic.  I had not had time to do this for Red.  But these are the parts you need for sure. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]

From Radio Shack website:  

UHF-to-Motorola-Type Scanner Adapter  
Model: 278-208  |  Catalog #: 278-208  

This scanner adapter accepts a PL-259 UHF-type plug and fits a Motorola-type socket. Connects to ant...

Yep, those are the parts that I got.  Look just like the ones in the photo, and they don't work on my ride.  >:(  The black connector is too deep for the antenna mount.  Intersting.

Solderless Motorola-Type Inline Jack
Model: 274-710  |  Catalog #: 274-710

This Motorola-type jack accepts antennas made for many scanners and car radios.  

  
The part that doesn't fit for me is the 274-710, the solderless connector.  The barrel is too big to slide inside the connector for the antenna on the tour pak.  Is there a slightly smaller version of this connector?  It doesn't appear to be too much bigger around then, maybe an !/8th of an inch.  The other connector plugs in perfectly to the coax run, so I was able to make sure that my coax run from the radio was good using my dummy load.  I just can't go from the meter to the tour pak connector with that black barrel connector.  Appreciate the help.
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on January 29, 2007, 05:30:32 AM
Morning Red !

Thanks for your reply in the other thread :

[highlight]Jacques,
Yep, those are the J&Ms, so you'll get an idea of what they'll look like on your  SEUC.  They work great too.  Really had a chance to test them out on the ride, and they are sooooooooooooooooooooo much better than the stock whips in all areas.  Got a lot of comments on them too.  I think J&M is going to be busy in the next few months selling these babies.  I think I may contact them and see if they'd be willing to give a discount to the forum members.
Cheers ,
Red [/highlight]

When I was in touch with John, I've asked a good price for the group but no chance.
You need to ask again.
In other way, it's to found a dealer that he accept to sold for the group with a discount.

Regards
Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 29, 2007, 10:07:10 AM
Quote
Morning Red !

Thanks for your reply in the other thread :

[highlight]Jacques,
Yep, those are the J&Ms, so you'll get an idea of what they'll look like on your  SEUC.  They work great too.  Really had a chance to test them out on the ride, and they are sooooooooooooooooooooo much better than the stock whips in all areas.  Got a lot of comments on them too.  I think J&M is going to be busy in the next few months selling these babies.  I think I may contact them and see if they'd be willing to give a discount to the forum members.
Cheers ,
Red [/highlight]

When I was in touch with John, I've asked a good price for the group but no chance.
You need to ask again.
In other way, it's to found a dealer that he accept to sold for the group with a discount.

Regards
Jacques
Jacques,
Unfortunately, that's the same answer I got.   :-[  But that's not going to discourage me from getting their products.  They still make some of the best stuff out there and their customer service is second to none.
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on January 29, 2007, 11:29:46 AM
Red,
I spoke about a deal with a distributor because Ultrafx wrote :

[highlight]Ordered mine from Sierra Electronics -http://www.sierra-mc.com/proddetail.asp?prod=JM%2DHRUP%2DATM - (great folks) for $34 each plus $5.50 for shipping.  Only problem is that when they arrived today it looks like UPS drove their truck over the package.  All torn up.  Can't tell if antennas are damaged but packaging sure is.  Anyway, filed a claim with UPS who called Sierra and they shipped new set today[/highlight]

I think that it's possible to obtain a discount with free shipping for US with a good packaging. ;)
It's too late for me but for the forum members why not ?

Regards
Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 29, 2007, 11:38:45 AM
Quote
Red,
I spoke about a deal with a distributor because Ultrafx wrote :

[highlight]Ordered mine from Sierra Electronics -http://www.sierra-mc.com/proddetail.asp?prod=JM%2DHRUP%2DATM - (great folks) for $34 each plus $5.50 for shipping.  Only problem is that when they arrived today it looks like UPS drove their truck over the package.  All torn up.  Can't tell if antennas are damaged but packaging sure is.  Anyway, filed a claim with UPS who called Sierra and they shipped new set today[/highlight]

I think that it's possible to obtain a discount with free shipping for US with a good packaging. ;)
It's too late for me but for the forum members why not ?

Regards
Jacques
Jacques,
Thanks for that info.  I'll check into it.  8-)
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on January 29, 2007, 01:33:43 PM
Got mine installed yesterday and they look great.  Too darn cold to get it out and check swr - maybe this weekend I can.  As long as the swr is no worse than stock - about 2.9 from my reading - then I'm sticking with the J&Ms.  Really like the looks of these much better than any shorties I've ever seen.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 29, 2007, 01:40:39 PM
Quote
Got mine installed yesterday and they look great.  Too darn cold to get it out and check swr - maybe this weekend I can.  As long as the swr is no worse than stock - about 2.9 from my reading - then I'm sticking with the J&Ms.  Really like the looks of these much better than any shorties I've ever seen.
Ultra,
Looking forward to what you get for an SWR.  I checked with Radio Shack and they don't have a solderless motorola-type plug that's smaller in diameter.  Of course she didn't know how to do a broader search in their computer either to see if any other stores or the company carried such a beast.  Now, I'm one of the ones anxiously awaiting to see what you get for an SWR too.   >:(  When I was out riding Saturday, the CB sounded the best I've ever heard an HD CB sound...really scientific analysis, huh?  :-[  Anyway, let us know what you get.
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: arcticdude on January 30, 2007, 10:41:18 AM
If you've got an 07 and you're having problems with the shack crap, you need to take another look at the parts list.  Ensure you've got the correct parts, because they work.  I bought mine for the 06 and used the exact same setup on the 07 when I got back from MV.  Some of the connections do require a firm push together.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on January 30, 2007, 11:50:30 AM
Antennas arrived yesterday and I can tell they are the chit.

No more rubber duckies for me, while the Freedoms did the job they looke like carap in warm weather with the bend the 80mph wind put in them (especially the CB side).

Looking forward to a nice stiffy antenna from now one.  And I hope it lasts longer than four hours too.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 30, 2007, 12:50:12 PM
Quote
If you've got an 07 and you're having problems with the shack crap, you need to take another look at the parts list.  Ensure you've got the correct parts, because they work.  I bought mine for the 06 and used the exact same setup on the 07 when I got back from MV.  Some of the connections do require a firm push together.
That's what I'm thinking, because the only way the black connector will fit into the connector on my tour pak would be to break it.  It's physically too big around to fit into the connector.
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on January 31, 2007, 07:41:23 AM
Quote
Got mine installed yesterday and they look great.  Too darn cold to get it out and check swr - maybe this weekend I can.  As long as the swr is no worse than stock - about 2.9 from my reading - then I'm sticking with the J&Ms.  Really like the looks of these much better than any shorties I've ever seen.

Look forward to hearing what SWR is achievable, Ufxr!   Also impressiond of CB performance in use if possible.

Cheers,

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on January 31, 2007, 11:15:50 AM
Quote

Look forward to hearing what SWR is achievable, Ufxr!   Also impressiond of CB performance in use if possible.

Cheers,

Jim
Out of town this past weekend and did not get them on until Sunday night.  Been working since then and it has been cold - and even colder this weekend so probably not get to ride.  But maybe I can pull 'er out to the street and at least do a quick check on the swr but not until Sunday.  I'll post what reading I get asap. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on January 31, 2007, 11:34:38 AM
Quote
Out of town this past weekend and did not get them on until Sunday night.  Been working since then and it has been cold - and even colder this weekend so probably not get to ride.  But maybe I can pull 'er out to the street and at least do a quick check on the swr but not until Sunday.  I'll post what reading I get asap. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]

Good man!  [smiley=drink.gif]

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: arcticdude on January 31, 2007, 04:25:11 PM
Quote
That's what I'm thinking, because the only way the black connector will fit into the connector on my tour pak would be to break it.  It's physically too big around to fit into the connector.
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red

RD,
The black connector you bought should go outside the metal connector in the tourpak.  Standard radio antenna connector size.  (Bike has male end to go into the black non-soldered connector from RS.)  The screw on connector you bought should go inside the connector on the bike.  I guess I should add that the bike's connector we're talking about is under the liner near the lock/latch mechanism and not where the antenna wires go through the back of the tourpak.  You did lift out the tourpak liner, right?
arctic
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 31, 2007, 06:31:39 PM
Quote

RD,
The black connector you bought should go outside the metal connector in the tourpak.  Standard radio antenna connector size.  (Bike has male end to go into the black non-soldered connector from RS.)  The screw on connector you bought should go inside the connector on the bike.  I guess I should add that the bike's connector we're talking about is under the liner near the lock/latch mechanism and not where the antenna wires go through the back of the tourpak.  You did lift out the tourpak liner, right?
arctic
Arctic,
I called another Radio Shack and found out that they had the part in stock and went and got it.  It turns out that the packaging at the other RS was right, but the part inside was wrong.  I should have been leary when I saw that that package had been taped shut, but it was the only one they had, so I bought it.  Anyway, when I looked at the new part today, it was different from the one I had.  This one was the right one and so I put it on the cable and took the bike outside to do some measurements....here's what I got from the J&M's "right out of the bag'"...

Channel:  1    1.2:1
Channel: 19   1.8:1
Channel: 40   2.6:1

John Lazzeroni, the one that designed these antennas at J&M told me that they are tuned to an SWR of about 1.2:1 on channel 1, 2.0:1 on channel 20 and 2.7:1 on channel 40. So I would say given the variance of meters and test locations (mine was outside in the middle of the street in my neighborhood, temperature was 29 degrees F), I'm spot on with what he said they'd be.

I'm very pleased with those results and am not even going to adjust them.  I hope this helps in any decisions you might have about getting these.  Now, not only do they look really good, they perform sweet too.

Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: hogheritage04 on January 31, 2007, 07:07:31 PM
Well, I finally got my antennas from J&M.  I tried them out on a ride with a buddy, and the CB worked great!  The regular radio also worked great.  I didn't check the SWR since I don't have a meter, and J&M guaranteed that it would work better than original out of the box....it does! [smiley=banana.gif] I'm really pleased on how they look and work...much better than stock!  I told my dealer parts Mgr and he said if they work good, he will start carrying them, as he has been looking for good shortys.  Thanks again to my brothers here on the forum for all the great advice. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: SilverDawg on January 31, 2007, 09:27:31 PM
Quote

RD,
The black connector you bought should go outside the metal connector in the tourpak.  Standard radio antenna connector size.  (Bike has male end to go into the black non-soldered connector from RS.)  The screw on connector you bought should go inside the connector on the bike.  I guess I should add that the bike's connector we're talking about is under the liner near the lock/latch mechanism and not where the antenna wires go through the back of the tourpak.  You did lift out the tourpak liner, right?
arctic

Is there an additional part that we need to order?  I thought they just screwed in where the whips were installed?
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on January 31, 2007, 09:39:10 PM
Quote

Is there an additional part that we need to order?  I thought they just screwed in where the whips were installed?
CB,
There's nothing extra you need to order other than the whips.  That was a part I had to get so that I could do the SWR measurements.  (See my previous post, where I gave my SWR results.)  The antennas are great.  I think I may do the same thing and see if my dealer would like to carry them.  The ones they carry right now are called "Cycle Whips" and they're rubber duckies.  They look nice but actually performed worse than the stock whips.  I bought a pair because I couldn't stand the big whips anymore.  They were only $9.95 each, so there was no big loss when I replaced them with the J&M shorties.  I get a lot of compliments on their looks.  The do look nice.
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: GasRat on January 31, 2007, 10:08:15 PM
Thats great to hear on the results, I really liked the looks of them & was going off what J&M said about them & ordered them Monday. But I feel a lot better about it when I here from other users on the real world performance of a product. Can't wait to get them &  put them on.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on January 31, 2007, 10:41:31 PM
Red, glad you finally got the right part to get the swr readings.  I'll try to check mine this weekend and see if they are close to yours.  Those are much, much better readings than the stock whips.   [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: SilverDawg on January 31, 2007, 10:43:10 PM
Quote
CB,
There's nothing extra you need to order other than the whips.  That was a part I had to get so that I could do the SWR measurements.  (See my previous post, where I gave my SWR results.)  The antennas are great.  I think I may do the same thing and see if my dealer would like to carry them.  The ones they carry right now are called "Cycle Whips" and they're rubber duckies.  They look nice but actually performed worse than the stock whips.  I bought a pair because I couldn't stand the big whips anymore.  They were only $9.95 each, so there was no big loss when I replaced them with the J&M shorties.  I get a lot of compliments on their looks.  The do look nice.
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red

thanks Red,  I'm in (assuming my bike still gets built!!)
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on February 01, 2007, 02:50:19 AM
Also, The design of these antennas is very nice on my desk while waiting the delivery of my Jester.
 [smiley=huepfenjump3.gif]

Thanks Red and all guys for this job of validation. [smiley=drink.gif]

Best regards
Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 01, 2007, 04:58:48 AM
Quote
Red, glad you finally got the right part to get the swr readings.  I'll try to check mine this weekend and see if they are close to yours.  Those are much, much better readings than the stock whips.   [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Thanks Ultra.  I'll be interested to see how your turn out too.  As you can see I wasn't going to let this issue beat me.  :D I knew that I couldn't have the one odd-ball bike in the world that had different connectors.  I became obsessed with getting it done.  Glad that's over, now I can stop obsessing over it.

Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: arcticdude on February 01, 2007, 08:39:54 AM
RD,
I kind of figured the part had to be incorrect, as somebody with you experience would be still able to make the connection passed out after a really good night on the town!! [smiley=huepfenlol2.gif] Great to hear the readings you got.  That's about where I got the 06 to when I quit with it.  I think the stocks will give better swr at the upper end, as I was able to get under 2 across the board, but that may be due to the extra length.  Every group I ever ridden with always chose a low channel anyway!
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 01, 2007, 11:52:21 AM
Quote
RD,
I kind of figured the part had to be incorrect, as somebody with you experience would be still able to make the connection passed out after a really good night on the town!! [smiley=huepfenlol2.gif] Great to hear the readings you got.  That's about where I got the 06 to when I quit with it.  I think the stocks will give better swr at the upper end, as I was able to get under 2 across the board, but that may be due to the extra length.  Every group I ever ridden with always chose a low channel anyway!
Arctic,
Thanks for that...that's why I was so obsessed with getting this done.  ;)  I'm leaving mine the way it is because all of my comms, and I guess this goes back to my old 23 channel days, are done below channel 20, and that's where these antennas are working nicely. You can get under two across the board with these, according to Mr. Larrezoni at J&M, if you want to.  Put the CB on channel 20 and then pull the rubber cap off of the top of the antenna and unravel about an inch or two of copper wire, cut it off, and take measurements again...he intentionally left them a little "long" for that purpose.

Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on February 01, 2007, 12:36:01 PM
Quote
Ordered mine from Sierra Electronics -http://www.sierra-mc.com/proddetail.asp?prod=JM%2DHRUP%2DATM - (great folks)

I have to disagree strongly on the "great folks" part, UFXR....   [smiley=soapbox.gif]  Here's how they treat people trying to give them business:

"We would like to thank you for your order of the replacement Harley
antennas, however we are not able to verify funds on the MasterCard due to
it bills outside of the United States.  Therefore we have cancelled your
order.  

Diana
 
Sierra Electronics"

Obviously 1) they have no idea how to get authorisation on a credit card 2) they don't like to sound in any way helpful or apologetic 3) they haven't the sense to say "can you pay by PayPal". 4) they don't need my money.

Frankly, their attitude stinks; hard to see how they could be less helpful.

Sierra Electronics?  Just say "NO!"  [smiley=furious3.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on February 01, 2007, 01:36:55 PM
Eqcons, sorry to hear that.  Can't speak for Diana but perhaps is was not fully clear what problem she was having verifying your card - don't know?  But I know I've had issues with my credit cards from time to time (not with Sierra), especially when I have an item which will require a signature shipped to my office vs my home billing address.  Would suggest that you email her because I do think they take PayPal.  I am in no way affiliated with or even personally know any of these folks.  But I have purchased J&M and other products from them several times and found their prices to be great and their service prompt and courteous.  Hope you can get this worked out.

Regards
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on February 01, 2007, 01:49:39 PM
Quote
Eqcons, sorry to hear that.  Can't speak for Diana but perhaps is was not fully clear what problem she was having verifying your card - don't know?  But I know I've had issues with my credit cards from time to time (not with Sierra), especially when I have an item which will require a signature shipped to my office vs my home billing address.  Would suggest that you email her because I do think they take PayPal.  I am in no way affiliated with or even personally know any of these folks.  But I have purchased J&M and other products from them several times and found their prices to be great and their service prompt and courteous.  Hope you can get this worked out.

Regards

Yes, they do take PayPal, UFXR - I knew that from when I placed the order.  She didn't bother to suggest it though, just, as you saw, cancelled the order with not a word of apology.  She has since emailed me back in response to my complaint, and said I could use Paypal if I wanted, but if I did that, they would not ship to my friend in the US, but only to me in the uk  [smiley=nixweiss.gif]  and their charge for shipping to the UK is ridiculous - nearly $40. That's more than twice the cost of the combined shipping charges from them to my friend, and my friend to me!

I run a mail order business myself, taking credit cards, and if we have a problem with a customers card, we contact them to try to sort it out - we don't just arbitrarily cancel their order!

Cheers,

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on February 01, 2007, 02:11:11 PM
Quote

Yes, they do take PayPal, UFXR - I knew that from when I placed the order.  She didn't bother to suggest it though, just, as you saw, cancelled the order with not a word of apology.  She has since emailed me back in response to my complaint, and said I could use Paypal if I wanted, but if I did that, they would not ship to my friend in the US, but only to me in the uk  [smiley=nixweiss.gif]  and their charge for shipping to the UK is ridiculous - nearly $40. That's more than twice the cost of the combined shipping charges from them to my friend, and my friend to me!

I run a mail order business myself, taking credit cards, and if we have a problem with a customers card, we contact them to try to sort it out - we don't just arbitrarily cancel their order!

Cheers,

Jim

Jim, I hear you man.  That's the way it should be.

Jerry
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on February 01, 2007, 02:28:20 PM
Good evening Jim,  :)

I bought mines directly to J&M.
The cost was : 39.99 X 2 = 79.98 $ and the shipping : 27 $.
Total amount = 107 $.
The total cost with all charges is 85 euros.
I paid with my credit card.

All contacts and exchanges with Mr John Lazzeroni or Brian Hilty (Sales Manager) were perfect.
Excellent packaging. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]

Good luck for yours !

Only one thing : They accepted not a discount for the CVO's members group. :(
But what's preferable...... ::)

Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on February 01, 2007, 02:40:28 PM
Quote
Good evening Jim,  :)

I bought mines directly to J&M.
The cost was : 39.99 X 2 = 79.98 $ and the shipping : 27 $.
Total amount = 107 $.
The total cost with all charges is 85 euros.
I paid with my credit card.

All contacts and exchanges with Mr John Lazzeroni or Brian Hilty (Sales Manager) were perfect.
Excellent packaging. [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]

Good luck for yours !

Only one thing : They accepted not a discount for the CVO's members group. :(
But what's preferable...... ::)

Jacques
 

Bonsoir, Jacques!  Ça va bien pour toi, j'espère?

Yes, plainly you got better service from J&M, but they still charged WAY too much for postage. (especially when postage to a US address is built in to the cost - they ship free to US addresses, so you're paying twice!) Global Priority Mail should be less than $10.  I know the difference isn't much, but I just cannot bear to be charged way over the top like that - it goes against the grain. I think when you buy something, postage costs should be a service, not the main profit centre!

À bientôt,

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on February 01, 2007, 02:59:01 PM
C'est agréable de lire quelques mots en français, Merci!

I understand you but also, I look the problem on the other side :
In France, we have two J&M's sellers for Honda Goldwing.
It's possible to order the antennas but it'll be a special order with more time for delivery and a purchase cost X2 than I've paid.

For me it's a good compromise because i've a good product, less expensive than in France.
Sure, I've paid twice shipping cost and this practice is not acceptable.

Bonne soirée
Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Midnight Rider on February 01, 2007, 03:30:14 PM
Quote

Jim, I hear you man.  That's the way it should be.

Jerry


Uncle, Uncle!!!!  I just ordered two of the darn things from Dianne at Sierra...you guys convinced me, and I'll probably be using my CB more this coming year and don't want to burn it up.  Don't have a SWR meter, and don't want to get one, so if these are this good out of the box, that's good enough for me.

Thanks guys, I needed to spend some more money today...got my daily "fix"... ;)
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 01, 2007, 03:55:54 PM
Quote

Bonsoir, Jacques!  Ça va bien pour toi, j'espère?

Yes, plainly you got better service from J&M, but they still charged WAY too much for postage. (especially when postage to a US address is built in to the cost - they ship free to US addresses, so you're paying twice!) Global Priority Mail should be less than $10.  I know the difference isn't much, but I just cannot bear to be charged way over the top like that - it goes against the grain. I think when you buy something, postage costs should be a service, not the main profit centre!

À bientôt,

Jim

Jim,
Sorry to hear you're having problems.  Might I suggest you wire the money to your friend in the States, have him purchase the antennas himself and then mail them to you in Scotland?  I don't know if that would work for you, but it's an option.  Canceling your order like that without trying to work something with you is not right.
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 01, 2007, 03:58:26 PM
Quote


Uncle, Uncle!!!!  I just ordered two of the darn things from Dianne at Sierra...you guys convinced me, and I'll probably be using my CB more this coming year and don't want to burn it up.  Don't have a SWR meter, and don't want to get one, so if these are this good out of the box, that's good enough for me.

Thanks guys, I needed to spend some more money today...got my daily "fix"... ;)
Terry,
As long as your coax run from your radio to your tour pak isn't kinked or anything, the shorties will exceed the performance of the stock whips right out of the package, as you can see by the measurements I posted earlier.  Ultra hopefully will be doing measurements on his this weekend which should then give two samples of SWRs for them.  Just "by-the-ear" performance will be noticeable.
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Midnight Rider on February 01, 2007, 04:10:28 PM
Quote
Terry,
As long as your coax run from your radio to your tour pak isn't kinked or anything, the shorties will exceed the performance of the stock whips right out of the package, as you can see by the measurements I posted earlier.  Ultra hopefully will be doing measurements on his this weekend which should then give two samples of SWRs for them.  Just "by-the-ear" performance will be noticeable.
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red

Red...not that it matters at this point, but how easy are they to get on and off?  I'm thinking of when I cover the bike at night on trips with my Exigent (sp?) full cover...I currently have the rubber duckies from Freedom and they just fold over, but I'm assuming these will have to be removed and stored, or I'll have to sew some holes in my cover.  Is it just a set screw?
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 01, 2007, 08:03:28 PM
Quote

Red...not that it matters at this point, but how easy are they to get on and off?  I'm thinking of when I cover the bike at night on trips with my Exigent (sp?) full cover...I currently have the rubber duckies from Freedom and they just fold over, but I'm assuming these will have to be removed and stored, or I'll have to sew some holes in my cover.  Is it just a set screw?
Terry,
They're exactly like the stock whips.  Loosen the allen set screw and unscrew them.  Takes about 30 secs to do it.  
Cheers  [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Tbone on February 01, 2007, 08:11:39 PM
I ordered mine from Sierra on Monday around 5:30 in the afternoon via their website and they arrived today.  The antennas look great, the bike's in for service but I should have it back tomorrow.
Bob
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 01, 2007, 08:20:15 PM
Quote
I ordered mine from Sierra on Monday around 5:30 in the afternoon via their website and they arrived today.  The antennas look great, the bike's in for service but I should have it back tomorrow.
Bob
Tbone,
They'll look even better when they're on your bike.  ;)
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Tbone on February 01, 2007, 09:07:13 PM
Quote
Tbone,
They'll look even better when they're on your bike.  ;)
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
I know you're right Red and I hate waiting!!  >:(
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: TCinVA on February 01, 2007, 09:21:05 PM
Red,
Another satisfied customer.  I also ordered mine from Sierra - Tuesday afternoon - and they arrived today.  "Great looking pair" ;D ;D.  I'll try them out on my '03 this weekend.  See how they hold up to near zero temps [smiley=nervous.gif].  They do look like quality gear.  Thanks for all your insight on these.  For everyone - the total cost w/shipping was $75 and change to Northern VA.  Sweet deal.
TC
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 01, 2007, 10:12:58 PM
Quote
Red,
Another satisfied customer.  I also ordered mine from Sierra - Tuesday afternoon - and they arrived today.  "Great looking pair" ;D ;D.  I'll try them out on my '03 this weekend.  See how they hold up to near zero temps [smiley=nervous.gif].  They do look like quality gear.  Thanks for all your insight on these.  For everyone - the total cost w/shipping was $75 and change to Northern VA.  Sweet deal.
TC
TC,
Good deal on that.  So far mine are holding up well to the cold...they haven't gotten any more stiff than they were when I mounted them.  They'll look good on your 03, but will look even better on the SEUC when it comes in.
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on February 01, 2007, 11:03:45 PM
Quote


Uncle, Uncle!!!!  I just ordered two of the darn things from Dianne at Sierra...you guys convinced me, and I'll probably be using my CB more this coming year and don't want to burn it up.  Don't have a SWR meter, and don't want to get one, so if these are this good out of the box, that's good enough for me.

Thanks guys, I needed to spend some more money today...got my daily "fix"... ;)
You got off cheap today Terry.  [smiley=sauer052.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on February 01, 2007, 11:07:49 PM
Glad to see all you guys got good service from Sierra.  Sorry that Jim (Eqons) had difficulty and there is no excuse for not trying to work things out.  But perhaps they just are not equipped to handle overseas orders.  Maybe this will wake them up.

Anyway the J&Ms no matter where you get them are a real quality item.  Improve the looks of the SE Ultra 100% from the stock whips.  Can't wait to try them out.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on February 02, 2007, 06:03:45 AM
Quote
But perhaps they just are not equipped to handle overseas orders.

Their website is all set up to do overseas orders, but they just don't want to put any effort in if its required.  That doesn't bode well for domestic customers if you have a problem after purchase.....  :-/

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Midnight Rider on February 02, 2007, 11:22:50 AM
Quote

Their website is all set up to do overseas orders, but they just don't want to put any effort in if its required.  That doesn't bode well for domestic customers if you have a problem after purchase.....  :-/

Jim

Jim...might be they're just not used to doing overseas things.  Diane was extremely pleasant to deal with, and very accomodating.  Perhaps you just caught them on a bad day, as everyone else seems satisfied with their service...everybody can have a bad day. [smiley=nixweiss.gif]
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on February 02, 2007, 11:57:27 AM
Quote

Jim...might be they're just not used to doing overseas things.  Diane was extremely pleasant to deal with, and very accomodating.  Perhaps you just caught them on a bad day, as everyone else seems satisfied with their service...everybody can have a bad day. [smiley=nixweiss.gif]

Hmmm..... Maybe, Terry - but you read the blunt email she sent to me.  Nothing pleasant, accomodating, or helpful at all about that, just "we've cancelled your order"; I can't believe that they aren't used to doing overseas things either, as their site is all set up to do that.  For me, it reads that they will be pleasant and accomodating if taking your money needs no effort. If it does, it's too much trouble for them.... If a new customer wants to order from me, and I'm not used to some peculiarity of his or her order, I'll take the trouble to find out what I need to do to fill the order, not cancel it out of hand.

A bad day? Sure - we can all have them, me as much as anyone. But she had the chance to fix it, and still couldn't be helpful at all.  I'd love to see what happens if you buy from them and have a real problem afterwards....

Anyone know the name of a senior person there?  I'm really in the mood for complaining about her attitude. >:(

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on February 02, 2007, 12:35:31 PM
[size=10]C'est agréable de lire quelques mots en français, Merci![/size]

De rien, Jacques..... Je sais très bien que parce que seulement anglais est parlé ici, il peut être un peu fatiguant à lire. Tout le plaisir est pour moi!

[size=10]I understand you but also, I look the problem on the other side :
In France, we have two J&M's sellers for Honda Goldwing.
It's possible to order the antennas but it'll be a special order with more time for delivery and a purchase cost X2 than I've paid[/size].


Yes, you are correct, of course - it's just that as a Scotsman, I look after my money!  ;) All the members of the board should be told - Copper wire was invented by two Scotsmen fighting over a 1¢ coin! ;D ;D ;D

[size=10]For me it's a good compromise because i've a good product, less expensive than in France.
Sure, I've paid twice shipping cost and this practice is not acceptable[/size].


Yup!  It brings out the Scotsman in me big time!

[size=10]Bonne soirée[/size]

et à toi.

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on February 03, 2007, 05:25:09 AM
Good news for my bike !
My antennas will stay not long time on my desk.
Previously, the delivery date was April 2007.
Yesterday, my dealer says me that the jester is started since 9th January and will arrive in two weeks. [smiley=huepfenjump3.gif]
But the problem for a european MAP for A/C and exhausts without flaps is not solved.
I speak with my dealer about the TM with AT and I hope to convince him that it's a good way for his customers (and of course for the maintain of the warranty with him).
News in the next days ......

Best regards
Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on February 03, 2007, 06:49:39 AM
Quote
Good news for my bike !
My antennas will stay not long time on my desk.
Previously, the delivery date was April 2007.
Yesterday, my dealer says me that the jester is started since 9th January and will arrive in two weeks. [smiley=huepfenjump3.gif]
But the problem for a european MAP for A/C and exhausts without flaps is not solved.
I speak with my dealer about the TM with AT and I hope to convince him that it's a good way for his customers (and of course for the maintain of the warranty with him).
News in the next days ......

Best regards
Jacques

Good news, Jacques, congratulations!  [smiley=pepper.gif]

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 03, 2007, 11:02:24 AM
Quote
Good news for my bike !
My antennas will stay not long time on my desk.
Previously, the delivery date was April 2007.
Yesterday, my dealer says me that the jester is started since 9th January and will arrive in two weeks. [smiley=huepfenjump3.gif]
But the problem for a european MAP for A/C and exhausts without flaps is not solved.
I speak with my dealer about the TM with AT and I hope to convince him that it's a good way for his customers (and of course for the maintain of the warranty with him).
News in the next days ......

Best regards
Jacques

Jacques,
Outstanding!!! [smiley=bigok.gif] That's always the best news when the something is coming earlier than they quote you.  I know you're concerned about the European emission stuff, but that's something you can address after the bike arrives.  The big thing is your baby is almost delivered. [smiley=pineapple.gif] [smiley=pepper.gif] [smiley=mango.gif] [smiley=cucumber.gif] [smiley=apple.gif]
Cheers [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif],
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on February 03, 2007, 11:27:53 AM
Sure Red, the best is the delivery.
Without bike, no problem concerning the emissions.
The emissions are not the most important, the essential it's to ride with this jewel.
Probably I've more chance when I read the problems concerning the strike...

Now in my head :
 8-) [smiley=huepfenjump3.gif]  8-)  [smiley=huepfenjump3.gif]
and finally  [smiley=drink.gif] [smiley=drink.gif] [smiley=drink.gif]

Regards [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]
Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on February 04, 2007, 11:06:07 PM
Finally got to measure my swr today:

channel  1  1.4 : 1
channel 22 2.4 : 1
channel 40 3.1 :  1

Never use anything above channel 22 whici is what our HOG club uses on rides.  So think this will be OK.  Out of range for channel 40 but I'll never go up that high.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 05, 2007, 09:53:30 AM
Finally got to measure my swr today:

channel  1  1.4 : 1
channel 22 2.4 : 1
channel 40 3.1 :  1

Never use anything above channel 22 whici is what our HOG club uses on rides.  So think this will be OK.  Out of range for channel 40 but I'll never go up that high.

Ultra,
You're good to go.  You're like me so you're not going to use channel 40.  You won't damage the radio at 2.4:1.  Just your power will be down, but if you use it, like I do, only when riding in groups, you will have plenty of juice to cover those situations.  How's your "by-the-ear" reaction to the antennas?  Do you hear a noticeable difference in performance?  You can tune the whips if you desire, but at those readings, I'd probably just leave them alone.  That's better than the stock whips will give you.   Thanks for the report.
Cheers 8),
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on February 05, 2007, 11:18:15 AM
Ultra,
You're good to go.  You're like me so you're not going to use channel 40.  You won't damage the radio at 2.4:1.  Just your power will be down, but if you use it, like I do, only when riding in groups, you will have plenty of juice to cover those situations.  How's your "by-the-ear" reaction to the antennas?  Do you hear a noticeable difference in performance?  You can tune the whips if you desire, but at those readings, I'd probably just leave them alone.  That's better than the stock whips will give you.   Thanks for the report.
Cheers 8),
Red
Agree, it is much better than stock.  Haven't ridden it yet, tied up all day Sat, and yesterday being Super Bowl Sunday and temps in the 20s did not riding possible.  Just listening in my garage though, sounds fine.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on February 06, 2007, 12:35:12 PM
A final note on this; after the hassle with trying to get these from the very unhelpful Sierra Electronics, I ordered them from J&M themselves.  The people there were a complete contrast to Sierra, and could not have been more helpful.  You may save a couple of bucks by going to Sierra, but I've seen what customer service is like from both them and J&M, and the extra couple of bucks is well spent.  If you have a problem later, you might come to appreciate spending the extra at purchase time!  ;)

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on February 06, 2007, 01:11:22 PM
Good decision , Jim  :thumbsup:

Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on February 06, 2007, 01:30:52 PM
Good decision , Jim  :thumbsup:

Jacques

Oui, je crois, Jacques!  :drink:
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 06, 2007, 01:53:06 PM
A final note on this; after the hassle with trying to get these from the very unhelpful Sierra Electronics, I ordered them from J&M themselves.  The people there were a complete contrast to Sierra, and could not have been more helpful.  You may save a couple of bucks by going to Sierra, but I've seen what customer service is like from both them and J&M, and the extra couple of bucks is well spent.  If you have a problem later, you might come to appreciate spending the extra at purchase time!  ;)

Jim
Jim,
Glad to see you ordered your antennas...will be anxious to hear how they work for you.  I know you've gotten the parts to make the cables, so let us know what kind of results you get.
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on February 06, 2007, 07:19:35 PM
Jim,
Glad to see you ordered your antennas...will be anxious to hear how they work for you.  I know you've gotten the parts to make the cables, so let us know what kind of results you get.
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red

I will Charlie - though it'll be March before I get the bike outdoors to try it!  :nixweiss:

Cheers,

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 06, 2007, 09:45:35 PM
I will Charlie - though it'll be March before I get the bike outdoors to try it!  :nixweiss:

Cheers,

Jim
Jim,
That's gotta suck, but at least you're in the right place to sit down in front of the fire with a nice single malt and get all toasty inside...that would definitely make me forget about the cold (and a few other things :P )
Cheer :2vrolijk_21:,
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on February 07, 2007, 05:16:24 AM
Jim,
That's gotta suck, but at least you're in the right place to sit down in front of the fire with a nice single malt and get all toasty inside...that would definitely make me forget about the cold (and a few other things :P )
Cheer :2vrolijk_21:,
Red

AND I get to look at my bike while I'm doing it!  ;D (Well, only in the house is warm enough for my baby....) :pineapple:
Cheers,

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 07, 2007, 07:14:47 AM
AND I get to look at my bike while I'm doing it!  ;D (Well, only in the house is warm enough for my baby....) :pineapple:
Cheers,

Jim
Jim,
Here's an idea for you during the winter months...put a wheel chock on the floor in front of your big screen and park the SEUC in it so it faces the TV.  Put on a nice scenic video taken from a helmet cam cruising the back roads of Scotland during the summer.  Consume a couple of nice single malts, get on the SEUC and make "potato, potato" sounds, and it'll almost be like riding.  (Gad, that sounds like something I may have done.  ::) )
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on February 07, 2007, 07:25:56 AM
Jim,
Here's an idea for you during the winter months...put a wheel chock on the floor in front of your big screen and park the SEUC in it so it faces the TV.  Put on a nice scenic video taken from a helmet cam cruising the back roads of Scotland during the summer.  Consume a couple of nice single malts, get on the SEUC and make "potato, potato" sounds, and it'll almost be like riding.  (Gad, that sounds like something I may have done.  ::) )
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red

ROFL!!!!  ;D :D ;D :D :huepfenlol2: :huepfenlol2: 

Great idea, Charlie - can get the wife on the back to nag me if the video looks too fast!  Actually it's just about feasible, though not quite - we have a 70" screen, but the bike has to stay as a centrepiece in the hall (BIG hall!!) because it wouldn't get through the door into where the TV is!

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 07, 2007, 12:31:21 PM
ROFL!!!!  ;D :D ;D :D :huepfenlol2: :huepfenlol2: 

Great idea, Charlie - can get the wife on the back to nag me if the video looks too fast!  Actually it's just about feasible, though not quite - we have a 70" screen, but the bike has to stay as a centrepiece in the hall (BIG hall!!) because it wouldn't get through the door into where the TV is!

Jim
Sounds like a perfect time to justify putting a 60" plasma display in the hall.  ;D.
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on February 07, 2007, 12:38:15 PM
Sounds like a perfect time to justify putting a 60" plasma display in the hall.  ;D.
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red

You haven't met my Mrs., Charlie, have you?  LOL!   :huepfenlol2:
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 07, 2007, 10:52:33 PM
You haven't met my Mrs., Charlie, have you?  LOL!   :huepfenlol2:
;D Now I know we can't be married to the same woman. :o
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on February 11, 2007, 05:35:44 PM
Got to ride today for first time with the J&M shorties.  Wow, the cb sounds so much better and they tell me my transmission was really good.  Did not realize but my XM trial period must have just expired so I listened to FM and the reception was great - better than with the stock whips I think but hard to know for sure.  Seems like I was able to get my local stations farther out than before.  Anyway, the J&Ms get a big thumbs up from me.   :cherry:
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Midnight Rider on February 11, 2007, 08:13:50 PM
Got to ride today for first time with the J&M shorties.  Wow, the cb sounds so much better and they tell me my transmission was really good.  Did not realize but my XM trial period must have just expired so I listened to FM and the reception was great - better than with the stock whips I think but hard to know for sure.  Seems like I was able to get my local stations farther out than before.  Anyway, the J&Ms get a big thumbs up from me.   :cherry:

Jerry, got mine installed as well, and I like them!!  Not only look better, but function well too.  I wasn't talking to anyone on the CB today, but did listen in a couple of times and it was strong.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 11, 2007, 10:53:12 PM
Got to ride today for first time with the J&M shorties.  Wow, the cb sounds so much better and they tell me my transmission was really good.  Did not realize but my XM trial period must have just expired so I listened to FM and the reception was great - better than with the stock whips I think but hard to know for sure.  Seems like I was able to get my local stations farther out than before.  Anyway, the J&Ms get a big thumbs up from me.   :cherry:
Jerry and Terry,
Great reports on the antennas.  Glad to see that they are working out great for you guys.  That's exactly the same results I've gotten with them.  They are definitely superior to the stock whips. ;)
Cheers  :2vrolijk_21:,
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: VaEagle on February 11, 2007, 11:38:08 PM
Everybody seems to say the new J&M shorties are better than the factory whips.
How do they compare to the Freedom shorties in performance both in transmitting and receiving?
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 12, 2007, 08:25:54 AM
Everybody seems to say the new J&M shorties are better than the factory whips.
How do they compare to the Freedom shorties in performance both in transmitting and receiving?
VA,
I can't compare the Freedoms to the J&M's because I've never tried them.  But I can tell you, I had rubber duckies, called Cycle Whips, that my dealer sold, and the J&M's blow their doors off.  No comparison at all.  I'm trying to convince my dealer to get rid of those POS Cycle Whips and sell the J&M's.  The J&M's are about 4 times more expensive, but worth every penny. IMHO.
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: hogheritage04 on February 12, 2007, 03:15:51 PM
VA,
I can't compare the Freedoms to the J&M's because I've never tried them.  But I can tell you, I had rubber duckies, called Cycle Whips, that my dealer sold, and the J&M's blow their doors off.  No comparison at all.  I'm trying to convince my dealer to get rid of those POS Cycle Whips and sell the J&M's.  The J&M's are about 4 times more expensive, but worth every penny. IMHO.
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red
  To reinterate what Red said, I also think the value is definitely there for J&M.  I think it's there for the quality, performance, AND customer service.  They are the best to deal with.  I have purchase several items from them and have never had a bad experience.  I would give them a definite  :2vrolijk_21:
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: VaEagle on February 13, 2007, 04:58:44 PM
I agree that J&M is great to deal with, it's just that I already have the Freedom shorties and I was trying to see if they are performancewise worth changing for since $75 or more is a lot for me to spend just for the cosmetics of thinner non-drooping antennas. ;D
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Midnight Rider on February 13, 2007, 05:11:11 PM
I agree that J&M is great to deal with, it's just that I already have the Freedom shorties and I was trying to see if they are performancewise worth changing for since $75 or more is a lot for me to spend just for the cosmetics of thinner non-drooping antennas. ;D

VA...this is completely subjective, as I am not a big CB user, but I had the Freedom's too and I seem to be able to hear things on these that I couldn't hear previously, and the FM is definitely stronger, no doubt about that.  Plus, they do look better... :2vrolijk_21:

I'll e-bay the freedom's...
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: golaith69 on February 16, 2007, 10:29:39 PM
This is odd that the MoCo didn't provide a velcro opening in the back of the Oasis cover like they do all the other outdoor covers that are made to fit Ultra's. [smiley=nixweiss.gif]

 [smiley=pumpkin.gif]
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 [smiley=fireman.gif]

 hello;  the  factory  CVO  COVER DOES  HAVE  THE  VELCRO  STRIP  FOR  THE  ANTENNA'S  on  the  flhtcuse  models
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Fired00d on February 16, 2007, 10:35:53 PM
hello;  the  factory  CVO  COVER DOES  HAVE  THE  VELCRO  STRIP  FOR  THE  ANTENNA'S  on  the  flhtcuse  models

This is true, but the cover we were speaking of (Oasis (http://www.harley-davidson.com/gma/gma_product.jsp?PRODUCT%3C%3Eprd_id=845524448769677&FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=2534374302286711&ASSORTMENT%3C%3East_id=2534374302286711&bmUID=1171683171827&bmLocale=en_US)) is an outdoor water repellent cover, and does not come w/the velcro strip for antenna it has holes.

 :pumpkin:
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 :fireman:
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on February 17, 2007, 04:49:48 PM
Hello golaith69 ,

My factory  CVO  cover have a velcro strip for antennas on my Jester 07.

 :vrolijk_26: Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: rubaga on February 18, 2007, 07:48:37 AM
I agree that J&M is great to deal with, it's just that I already have the Freedom shorties and I was trying to see if they are performancewise worth changing for since $75 or more is a lot for me to spend just for the cosmetics of thinner non-drooping antennas. ;D

I have ordered a whole variety of things from J&M and the service is great. Antennas is just one of the items I have. Given that my bike is not here yet I can not comment on how they would work but opinions in this thread encourage me that monies were well spent on these antennas.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 18, 2007, 08:35:33 AM
I have ordered a whole variety of things from J&M and the service is great. Antennas is just one of the items I have. Given that my bike is not here yet I can not comment on how they would work but opinions in this thread encourage me that monies were well spent on these antennas.
Rubaga,
Well worth the money spent.  The difference in performance is noticeable to the ear, let alone the meter, over the stock whips.  Plus, they look a heck of a lot better than those big-a$$ whips.
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: rubaga on February 18, 2007, 04:35:17 PM
Hi Red

Thanks for encouragement. I believe I ordered it after I have seen in on the pictures of one of the bikes here - either yours or Hard10's. Not sure. Really liked the look. Once I read that performance is also improved - I knew I had to get one.

So its in transfer now to me. I think it would even arrive before the bike does!  :2vrolijk_21: Will have to admire it while waiting for the bike.

All the best.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: VaEagle on February 20, 2007, 04:41:07 PM
While testing my first digital camera today I discovered a problem with my Freedom shortie CB antenna. The chrome is flaking off.
I have placed an order with J&M for their shortie antennas so this will not be a problem to worry about in the future.
Just wanted to pass on a heads up for those of you who are using the Freedom antennas. keep an eye on them. I hope you don't have this problem.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 20, 2007, 07:17:55 PM
While testing my first digital camera today I discovered a problem with my Freedom shortie CB antenna. The chrome is flaking off.
I have placed an order with J&M for their shortie antennas so this will not be a problem to worry about in the future.
Just wanted to pass on a heads up for those of you who are using the Freedom antennas. keep an eye on them. I hope you don't have this problem.
I saw you out there with a screwdriver scraping the chrome off :P...anything to justify getting the J&M's.   ;D  You'll be really happy with them.
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: TCinVA on February 20, 2007, 07:35:05 PM
I saw you out there with a screwdriver scraping the chrome off :P...anything to justify getting the J&M's.   ;D  You'll be really happy with them.
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red
Holy chit guys,
I sure hope dood doesn't see this picture :o.  Imagine what that could do to his OCD... ;D
Tony
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on February 20, 2007, 08:12:02 PM
Holy chit guys,
I sure hope dood doesn't see this picture :o.  Imagine what that could do to his OCD... ;D
Tony

He's bound to see it, the d00derator sees ALL!
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Fired00d on February 20, 2007, 08:16:51 PM
He's bound to see it, the d00derator sees ALL!
That's right. ;) :2vrolijk_21: ;D

 :pumpkin:
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 :fireman:
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: rubaga on February 21, 2007, 08:06:16 PM
While testing my first digital camera today I discovered a problem with my Freedom shortie CB antenna. The chrome is flaking off.
I have placed an order with J&M for their shortie antennas so this will not be a problem to worry about in the future.
Just wanted to pass on a heads up for those of you who are using the Freedom antennas. keep an eye on them. I hope you don't have this problem.

Yet another confirmation that J&M seems to be the best choice for antennas...
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: hard10 on February 23, 2007, 12:51:58 AM
Antenna were here when I got home tonight. Install this weekend.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Midnight Rider on February 23, 2007, 08:40:56 AM
These attenna work!!  I rode into work yesterday and was picking up all kinds of stuff I've not heard before.  Obviously better than the Freedoms.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 23, 2007, 09:46:29 AM
These attenna work!!  I rode into work yesterday and was picking up all kinds of stuff I've not heard before.  Obviously better than the Freedoms.
Terry,
Glad to hear ya like 'em.  I've got nothing but good stuff to say about them.  They've out-performed every antenna I have ever used on my bikes.
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Tbone on February 23, 2007, 09:49:47 AM
I'm finally going to have the chance to try them out on my way to Key West, I'm anxious to see how they do.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Midnight Rider on February 23, 2007, 10:45:34 AM
I'm finally going to have the chance to try them out on my way to Key West, I'm anxious to see how they do.

Bob...you sorry sumbitch ;) ;)  Man, I wish we were going down with you, bro!!  Maybe next year...You guys have a great time, and have a Margarita for me when you're looking out over the keys... :drink: :drink:
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Hoist! on February 23, 2007, 10:50:49 AM
Bob...you sorry sumbitch ;) ;)  Man, I wish we were going down with you, bro!!  Maybe next year...You guys have a great time, and have a Margarita for me when you're looking out over the keys... :drink: :drink:

No Terry, Mojitos in Key West! :drink: I wish I was going too! Enjoy your ride down there! Ride safe. ;) Hoist! 8)
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Tbone on February 23, 2007, 10:57:47 AM
Bob...you sorry sumbitch ;) ;)  Man, I wish we were going down with you, bro!!  Maybe next year...You guys have a great time, and have a Margarita for me when you're looking out over the keys... :drink: :drink:

Thanks Terry, wish you were going too!  Start planning next year now!  :2vrolijk_21:
I'll be sure to think of you while I'm sitting there with a  :drink: watching the sunset.  :2vrolijk_21:
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Tbone on February 23, 2007, 10:58:29 AM
No Terry, Mojitos in Key West! :drink: I wish I was going too! Enjoy your ride down there! Ride safe. ;) Hoist! 8)

Thanks Hoist, we'll think of you too!  :drink:
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Midnight Rider on February 23, 2007, 11:09:11 AM
Thanks Terry, wish you were going too!  Start planning next year now!  :2vrolijk_21:
I'll be sure to think of you while I'm sitting there with a  :drink: watching the sunset.  :2vrolijk_21:

Bob...my problem is this time of year is filled with Faculty promotions at work...I've got 16 boxes filled with f'in' paper for that process...don't usually get free from that burden until mid March, thus no Daytona either... :(

Work sometimes seriously interferes with my leisure time...5-7 more years and I'll have all the time I need on my hands!!  For now, I'll have to live vicariously through you and Ilene.

You guys be careful going down...watch out for those blue hairs!!  When are you rolling out?  Be sure and take plenty of pics, and give Ilene our best!! 
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on February 24, 2007, 05:44:23 PM
Got the SEUC back in one piesce with new tins and OCD add ons, so I got my J&M antennas mounted and they work great as well as look much better than my Freedoms, which in my case were just to limber.

Th new ones are great though, thanks for the heads up along the way from everyone else that has posted here.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 24, 2007, 07:28:07 PM
Git the SEUC back in one piesce with new tins and OCD add ons, so I got my J&M antennas mounted and they work great as well as look much better than my Freedoms, which in my case were just to limber.

Th new ones are great though, thanks for the heads up along the way from everyone else that has posted here.
Rog,
Glad to hear you like 'em.  They definitely look and perform better than anything I've ever used.
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: hard10 on February 26, 2007, 01:05:25 AM
Rog,
Glad to hear you like 'em.  They definitely look and perform better than anything I've ever used.
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red

I installed the J&M's over the weekend. I don't know about performance yet but they do look better.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on February 26, 2007, 01:10:30 AM
I installed the J&M's over the weekend. I don't know about performance yet but they do look better.

Excellant, I was looking at a pic of a melon with stock antennas and the sort of look out of place now.  The J&M's are great, you'll love them.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on February 26, 2007, 10:02:49 AM
I installed the J&M's over the weekend. I don't know about performance yet but they do look better.
AJ,
You'll find out that they perform as good as they look.  J&M has produced another winner.
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: VaEagle on March 12, 2007, 09:50:02 AM
I got to use the CB function yesterday on a charity run with my new J&M shorty antennas.  :2vrolijk_21:

I talked to both Harley riders and Goldwing guys. They all agreed that my transmissions were clearer than with the whips and Freedom rubber shorties. I also heard more conversations than I usually hear on the CB too.
All in all I would say the J&M shorties are the best way to go!
(FYI I did not use a SWR meter or remove any wire,just installed)
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on March 12, 2007, 09:58:14 AM
I got to use the CB function yesterday on a charity run with my new J&M shorty antennas.  :2vrolijk_21:

I talked to both Harley riders and Goldwing guys. They all agreed that my transmissions were clearer than with the whips and Freedom rubber shorties. I also heard more conversations than I usually hear on the CB too.
All in all I would say the J&M shorties are the best way to go!
(FYI I did not use a SWR meter or remove any wire,just installed)

What channel/s were you on?
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Tbone on March 12, 2007, 06:22:54 PM
What channel/s were you on?

Rog,
I had my first chance to try the J&M's on our Key West trip, the whole group stayed on channel 3 the entire time and they worked great, both sending and receiving.  I listened a lot on channel 19 from here to Tampa and back and the reception was good, I didn't try transmitting.
Bob
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on March 12, 2007, 06:27:50 PM
Bob, thanks for the info.  Sounds like a winner.  We just need some weather up here to ride in.  El Nino has been pixxin' on us relentlessly for weeks.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: VaEagle on March 13, 2007, 12:16:32 AM
I was working on Channel 5 that is what my group uses for runs.

I didn't have a chance to try other channels,sorry.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Buffalo Phil on March 13, 2007, 05:47:47 PM
Hi Guys,

I am regarding to buy the shorty antennas from J&M as I can see that everyone is happy with them.

I am tired of bending my whips before entering the garage.

Did you buy them directly from J&M or do you have a better tip for me?

Don't forget I need to have them shipped to Belgium, so a web shop would be better than a dealers shop.

Thanks for your reply.

Have a nice day.

Phil
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: jeffj on March 13, 2007, 06:03:16 PM
Hi Guys,

I am regarding to buy the shorty antennas from J&M as I can see that everyone is happy with them.

I am tired of bending my whips before entering the garage.

Did you buy them directly from J&M or do you have a better tip for me?

Don't forget I need to have them shipped to Belgium, so a web shop would be better than a dealers shop.

Thanks for your reply.

Have a nice day.

Phil

Phil,

I am not a J&M user but I have another alternative that I and a lot of members went with
Freedom Cycles     out of Reno, Nevada has a nice pair of antennas
I will attach a picture and link to their website:  http://www.freedomcyclereno.com/   scroll to the bottom for pic and info
If you have interest talk with James or Brad - Good Guys (775)358-3500

The pic of antenna on my scoot.....sorry for the dusty tour pak but a good pic of antennas

jeffj
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on March 13, 2007, 06:21:32 PM
I would definitely do the JM antennas having both.  The Freedoms bend too much in the warmer weather and the JM is much Cleaner.

However, if you want to do the Freedoms, I will gladly sell you my take offs (one Season) for $20.00 and you pay the post price.

Having said that, I'd still do the JM's but a good deal on the Freedoms if you want.

Roger
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on March 13, 2007, 06:38:48 PM
Side View of JM
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on March 14, 2007, 05:00:55 AM
I like these, on your bike or on mine, they fit perfectly ! :2vrolijk_21:

Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: T MAC on March 14, 2007, 10:09:27 PM
OK So now I Know the danger of being on this great site!  I just ordered the J&M antennas.  I will be ordering a jack and glare products this weekend.   :-* Thanks for all the info it really helps in making a decision.    :2vrolijk_21: T MAC
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on March 14, 2007, 10:13:03 PM
OK So now I Know the danger of being on this great site!  I just ordered the J&M antennas.  I will be ordering a jack and glare products this weekend.   :-* Thanks for all the info it really helps in making a decision.    :2vrolijk_21: T MAC
:D That's one of the benfits of knowing us great people...we will help you spend your money.  ;)   You made the right choice with the J&Ms I'm very happy with the looks and performance.
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: IronButt on March 24, 2007, 04:45:31 AM
Just got here, Thank you Red and Ultra for all the R&D I was looking at these and of course my friend says, Just cut the stock whips down and wala! Wait until I tell him what hed did to his radio :)

I am in CA and try to make it to Rolling Thunder in DC every year and I NEED the CB, it is a must! So THANK YOU! I read all 17 pages !!!

Steven
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: bisounours on March 24, 2007, 05:02:56 AM
 Good morning SJPZZZ,

I send you the   :welcome_005: from FRANCE.

It'll be nice for the other members if you present you in the thread "New Member Introduction"
with a pic of your bike  :2vrolijk_21:

Happy that our selection help you ! :huepfenjump3:

Best regards

  :vrolijk_26: Jacques
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: IronButt on March 24, 2007, 05:24:26 AM
Good Day to you, My Best Regards
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: IronButt on March 24, 2007, 05:29:38 AM
Will do the intro and photo today, Thank you!
Just wanted to thank the guys for the JM antenna work, TTYL
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on March 24, 2007, 09:26:51 AM
Just got here, Thank you Red and Ultra for all the R&D I was looking at these and of course my friend says, Just cut the stock whips down and wala! Wait until I tell him what hed did to his radio :)

I am in CA and try to make it to Rolling Thunder in DC every year and I NEED the CB, it is a must! So THANK YOU! I read all 17 pages !!!

Steven
SJPZZZ,
Welcome to the site, and make sure you include pics of your ride in the new member section.  A lot of people have done what your friend did to their factory whips.  Unless you know exactly how long to cut them, you've detuned them worse then when they came from the factory, which was bad enough.  If he doesn't do a lot of talking on his CB, he'll be okay because he won't be putting reflected power back into the finals of his transmitter.  You're much better off with the J&M's...glad we could have been some help in your decisions....

Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Red
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on March 24, 2007, 10:13:33 AM
SP, welcome to the party.  Glad to see you are into security, your avatar is great.

You may want the Clampetts guarding your wallet around here, someone is always getting into it.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on March 24, 2007, 11:37:56 AM
SP, welcome to the party.  Glad to see you are into security, your avatar is great.

You may want the Clampetts guarding your wallet around here, someone is always getting into it.
Yeah, but we love it.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: rubaga on March 24, 2007, 05:56:07 PM
SP. Welcome to the site!

Glad you liked the Antennas. Just got mine (even before my bike is here). These are great looking antennas.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: IronButt on March 24, 2007, 06:04:23 PM
Thanks, Working on my FNG NEWBIE pics and post. I believe these antenna are the best choice, ordered them last night.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: tompen on April 02, 2007, 09:27:43 PM
I just read the last 7 pages of this post and I might have missed someone else doing this. I cut 12 inches off from both antenna masts. The FM antenna is not a problem. It works fine but is receive only. I added 12 inches of 14 ga. wire between the antenna mast (inside the tour pack) and the wire that cnnects to it. Since it is on the same side of the tuning coil as the section I removed, the effective length is the same. I believe the SWR should be as good as it was from the factory. I really don't want to hear anything over about 5 miles anyway. I just don't want to destroy the finals in the radio. I will check the SWR when I get up the courage to pull the fairing.
CUDOS on this extreamly well read and managed site. You are realy doing a service. My 07 red/black SEEG is my fourth new Harley in five years. My last one was a 05 red SEEG. I love the 110. I also have a 1977 blue FLH with 12,000 miles. It was my Dads.
I just got it out (upstate NY) and I will deal with the lean mix / muffler stuff next. Anyway, thanks.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on April 02, 2007, 10:54:03 PM
I just read the last 7 pages of this post and I might have missed someone else doing this. I cut 12 inches off from both antenna masts. The FM antenna is not a problem. It works fine but is receive only. I added 12 inches of 14 ga. wire between the antenna mast (inside the tour pack) and the wire that cnnects to it. Since it is on the same side of the tuning coil as the section I removed, the effective length is the same. I believe the SWR should be as good as it was from the factory. I really don't want to hear anything over about 5 miles anyway. I just don't want to destroy the finals in the radio. I will check the SWR when I get up the courage to pull the fairing.
CUDOS on this extreamly well read and managed site. You are realy doing a service. My 07 red/black SEEG is my fourth new Harley in five years. My last one was a 05 red SEEG. I love the 110. I also have a 1977 blue FLH with 12,000 miles. It was my Dads.
I just got it out (upstate NY) and I will deal with the lean mix / muffler stuff next. Anyway, thanks.
Wow,
Interesting mod you did there.  I'm surprised that setup works.  Replacing an equal length wire inside of the tour pak does not equal what you took off of the whip.  All you did was add another piece of wire between the coil and a badly detuned antenna...you can take the SWR measurement in the tour pak and it won't be much different from when you take it at the back of the radio...the length of coax isn't long enough to cause that much loss.  I'm not sure where you got your info from on doing that, but I wouldn't run long on that setup...if it does SWR out good, I'll be absolutely amazed...Get the J&M's, they are worth the money spent.  Just my $0.02.
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
:devil:
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on April 03, 2007, 12:41:21 AM
I just read the last 7 pages of this post and I might have missed someone else doing this. I cut 12 inches off from both antenna masts. The FM antenna is not a problem. It works fine but is receive only. I added 12 inches of 14 ga. wire between the antenna mast (inside the tour pack) and the wire that cnnects to it. Since it is on the same side of the tuning coil as the section I removed, the effective length is the same. I believe the SWR should be as good as it was from the factory. I really don't want to hear anything over about 5 miles anyway. I just don't want to destroy the finals in the radio. I will check the SWR when I get up the courage to pull the fairing.
CUDOS on this extreamly well read and managed site. You are realy doing a service. My 07 red/black SEEG is my fourth new Harley in five years. My last one was a 05 red SEEG. I love the 110. I also have a 1977 blue FLH with 12,000 miles. It was my Dads.
I just got it out (upstate NY) and I will deal with the lean mix / muffler stuff next. Anyway, thanks.

Welcome aboard and you'll continue to appreciate the site as long as you are here.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on April 03, 2007, 05:17:30 AM
Get the J&M's, they are worth the money spent.  Just my $0.02.
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
:devil:

Hi Charlie. Finally checked the SWR on mine this weekend.  Standard whip was over 3:1 over most of the range (!).   These radios sure must have a tough output stage!   The J&M started at between 2.5 and 3.2 over the range, and I ended up cutting about 5" of wire from it, in ¼" chunks, which got it down to between 1.3:1 and 1.7:1 over the whole range (I was aiming to get it as low as possible on ch 30, which is what we use.)  So I think that's now reasonable, and on paper it should work better than the standard whip at least!  Not done any checks for range yet, as I had nobody to check it with.  Also flashed the radio firmware to the 8.19 version, but can't see any difference.  One thing I can say for sure is that the HK radio on this bike behaves a whole lot differently than the one on my '06 CUSE did, in many respects (vox, squelch, CB.....) and it had the same firmware as the new one originally came with, so I suspect they are shipping radio mk2 now..  ;)

Cheers,

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on April 03, 2007, 08:37:42 AM
Hi Charlie. Finally checked the SWR on mine this weekend.  Standard whip was over 3:1 over most of the range (!).   These radios sure must have a tought output stage!   The J&M started at between 2.5 and 3.2 over the range, and I ended up cutting about 5" of wire from it, in ¼" chunks, which got it down to between 1.3:1 and 1.7:1 over the whole range (I was aiming to get it as low as possible on ch 30, which is what we use.)  So I think that's now reasonable, and on paper it should work better than the standard whip at least!  Not done any checks for range yet, as I had nobody to check it with.  Also flashed the radio firmware to the 8.19 version, but can't see any difference.  One thing I can say for sure is that the HK radio on this bike behaves a whole lot differently than the one on my '06 CUSE did, in many respects (vox, squelch, CB.....) and it had the same firmware as the new one originally came with, so I suspect they are shipping radio mk2 now..  ;)

Cheers,

Jim
Jim,
Good numbers across the board...your antenna should work great now.  Surprising they were that high out of the bag, but John Larazoni from J&M told me that each bike would be different based on the individual radio.  I reflashed my radio to 8.19 also and don't see any difference what-so-ever, so not really sure what it fixed.  I wish HD, like most other companies when they come out with a software update, they state what issues that particular version addresses.  Sometimes the MoCo is too secretive.  It's almost like they're paranoid that someone may find out a secret of theirs.   :-* I can't vouch on the differences between last year's model and this year's, but I do know it's a heck of a lot better than the radio I had on my '02.
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Charlie
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on April 03, 2007, 08:56:19 AM
Sometimes the MoCo is too secretive.  It's almost like they're paranoid that someone may find out a secret of theirs. Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
Charlie

Amen to that Charlie!  :2vrolijk_21:  You know what drives me crazy?  In HOG Tales, or The Enthusiast, every single time - each and every time! - the Moco mentions "H-D" or "Harley" or "HOG" or "Sportster" or "Dyna" or "ABCs of Touring" or any one of a million other words, they feel they have to stick ™ or ® or © after it.  Like we didn't know already.  :soapbox:

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on April 03, 2007, 09:05:31 AM
Amen to that Charlie!  :2vrolijk_21:  You know what drives me crazy?  In HOG Tales, or The Enthusiast, every single time - each and every time! - the Moco mentions "H-D" or "Harley" or "HOG" or "Sportster" or "Dyna" or "ABCs of Touring" or any one of a million other words, they feel they have to stick ™ or ® or © after it.  Like we didn't know already.  :soapbox:

Jim

Hey guys, it drives me crazy too, but having been involved in a couple of trademark infringement deals with VW and Porsche in which they are protecting the trademark, I can tell you not to blame them.  Guess who?  The Feds, if the MoCo does not "aggressively" market and defend the trademark it will become public domain and then everyone would have free access to it.

That would be millions of dollars in licensing and sales for them.  So while it is another annoyance, it will remain. IMHP
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on April 03, 2007, 09:13:34 AM
Hey guys, it drives me crazy too, but having been involved in a couple of trademark infringement deals with VW and Porsche in which they are protecting the trademark, I can tell you not to blame them.  Guess who?  The Feds, if the MoCo does not "aggressively" market and defend the trademark it will become public domain and then everyone would have free access to it.

That would be millions of dollars in licensing and sales for them.  So while it is another annoyance, it will remain. IMHP

Yes, I know RJ - but in their own members magazine?  Surely they only need - for it to be legal - to do it once per item per issue, or even have a tiny sub paragraph somewhere listing all their registered trademarks?  I think it's WAY over the top to be insulting members' intelligence like that....  Just my 2c worth, of course!

 :2vrolijk_21:

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on April 03, 2007, 10:33:05 AM
Hey guys, it drives me crazy too, but having been involved in a couple of trademark infringement deals with VW and Porsche in which they are protecting the trademark, I can tell you not to blame them.  Guess who?  The Feds, if the MoCo does not "aggressively" market and defend the trademark it will become public domain and then everyone would have free access to it.

That would be millions of dollars in licensing and sales for them.  So while it is another annoyance, it will remain. IMHP
Rog,
I agree wholeheartedly as to why they do it, but like Jim said, it would be nice to have just a single disclaimer, like most adds have at the bottom, or beginning, etc, that states, such and such, and so and so, are registered trademarks of the Harley Davidson Motor CompanyTM instead of everytime they mention it in their magazine...
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
:devil:
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on April 03, 2007, 10:43:02 AM
Rog,
I agree wholeheartedly as to why they do it, but like Jim said, it would be nice to have just a single disclaimer, like most adds have at the bottom, or beginning, etc, that states, such and such, and so and so, are registered trademarks of the Harley Davidson Motor CompanyTM instead of everytime they mention it in their magazine...
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
:devil:

Yup, it's just so.... so.... so.... Moco™®©, I guess!  ;)

Just like every time they put anything into print, they feel the need to say whatever it is "may cause death or serious injury".  Hell, if they branded toilet tissue, they'd warn you that it "may cause death or serious injury"!  So motorcycling is dangerous?  No, Really?  Wow, I'd never have guessed!!  :huepfenjump3:

Cheers,

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: IronButt on April 03, 2007, 11:23:12 AM
Hi Charlie. Finally checked the SWR on mine this weekend.  Standard whip was over 3:1 over most of the range (!).   These radios sure must have a tough output stage!   The J&M started at between 2.5 and 3.2 over the range, and I ended up cutting about 5" of wire from it, in ¼" chunks, which got it down to between 1.3:1 and 1.7:1 over the whole range (I was aiming to get it as low as possible on ch 30, which is what we use.)  So I think that's now reasonable, and on paper it should work better than the standard whip at least!  Not done any checks for range yet, as I had nobody to check it with.  Also flashed the radio firmware to the 8.19 version, but can't see any difference.  One thing I can say for sure is that the HK radio on this bike behaves a whole lot differently than the one on my '06 CUSE did, in many respects (vox, squelch, CB.....) and it had the same firmware as the new one originally came with, so I suspect they are shipping radio mk2 now..  ;)

Cheers,

Jim

Jim,
I got the J&Ms for looks.  Let me ask a question about range... Isn't CB a line of sight type of wave?? IE taller antenna greater reach? Shorter antenna shorter reach??

Iron
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on April 03, 2007, 11:33:08 AM
Jim,
I got the J&Ms for looks.  Let me ask a question about range... Isn't CB a line of sight type of wave?? IE taller antenna greater reach? Shorter antenna shorter reach??

Iron

Yes, to some extent, Iron.  But a shorter antenna with a good VSWR will outperform a longer one with a poor figure......  Also worth remembering that radio waves are polarised, so the standard whip flexing about on the move will have an effect too - how great I don't know (Charlie??) - while the short ones flex less. But as well as plain line of sight, all sorts of other phenomena come into play - reflections etc....

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on April 03, 2007, 07:43:20 PM
Jim,
I got the J&Ms for looks.  Let me ask a question about range... Isn't CB a line of sight type of wave?? IE taller antenna greater reach? Shorter antenna shorter reach??

Iron
Iron,
You're somewhat right, but that's only because of power.  You're only allowed, legally, 4 watts.  CB's operate in the HF band which is an excellent long-haul band, which is why you'll notice "skip" chatter on your CB at various times of the day and year.  Depending on solar activity and atmospherics.  Okay now, that I've totally bored you, Jim is absolutely right, shorter antennas tuned right will always give you better results then badly tuned, like the factory whips, antennas.   If the factory whips were tuned properly, you wouldn't notice that much difference between the shorties and the factory whips.  You're pretty much limited to ground wave for normal communications and also antenna height.  Remember, the factory whips are electrically no higher than the shorties...you measure antenna height from the base of the antenna to the ground, they just give you a little more radiating surface, but the actual radiation pattern of vertically polarized omni-directional antenna is pretty much identical.  So the short answer is no, you're not going to see much better performance out of properly tuned factory whips, then you will out of the shorties.  But remember, the factory whips are badly out of tune...I still can't believe the MoCo lets those bikes go that way out of the factory.   Sorry to ramble Iron...
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
:devil:
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: IronButt on April 03, 2007, 09:08:01 PM
Iron,
You're somewhat right, but that's only because of power.  You're only allowed, legally, 4 watts.  CB's operate in the HF band which is an excellent long-haul band, which is why you'll notice "skip" chatter on your CB at various times of the day and year.  Depending on solar activity and atmospherics.  Okay now, that I've totally bored you, Jim is absolutely right, shorter antennas tuned right will always give you better results then badly tuned, like the factory whips, antennas.   If the factory whips were tuned properly, you wouldn't notice that much difference between the shorties and the factory whips.  You're pretty much limited to ground wave for normal communications and also antenna height.  Remember, the factory whips are electrically no higher than the shorties...you measure antenna height from the base of the antenna to the ground, they just give you a little more radiating surface, but the actual radiation pattern of vertically polarized omni-directional antenna is pretty much identical.  So the short answer is no, you're not going to see much better performance out of properly tuned factory whips, then you will out of the shorties.  But remember, the factory whips are badly out of tune...I still can't believe the MoCo lets those bikes go that way out of the factory.   Sorry to ramble Iron...
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
:devil:

So on a CB the base height not tip height, is what matters, for the non-Cliff Claven answer?
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on April 04, 2007, 09:00:50 AM
So on a CB the base height not tip height, is what matters, for the non-Cliff Claven answer?
Yep...in radio licensing terms it's called HAAT (Height Above Average Terrain).  Now, if I can just figure out how to mount the shorties on top of a 75 foot tower mounted to the tour pack.......... :P
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
:devil:
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Eqcons on April 04, 2007, 09:06:06 AM
Yep...in radio licensing terms it's called HAAT (Height Above Average Terrain).  Now, if I can just figure out how to mount the shorties on top of a 75 foot tower mounted to the tour pack.......... :P
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
:devil:

 ;D

Jim
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Midnight Rider on April 04, 2007, 08:21:32 PM
Iron,
You're somewhat right, but that's only because of power.  You're only allowed, legally, 4 watts.  CB's operate in the HF band which is an excellent long-haul band, which is why you'll notice "skip" chatter on your CB at various times of the day and year.  Depending on solar activity and atmospherics.  Okay now, that I've totally bored you, Jim is absolutely right, shorter antennas tuned right will always give you better results then badly tuned, like the factory whips, antennas.   If the factory whips were tuned properly, you wouldn't notice that much difference between the shorties and the factory whips.  You're pretty much limited to ground wave for normal communications and also antenna height.  Remember, the factory whips are electrically no higher than the shorties...you measure antenna height from the base of the antenna to the ground, they just give you a little more radiating surface, but the actual radiation pattern of vertically polarized omni-directional antenna is pretty much identical.  So the short answer is no, you're not going to see much better performance out of properly tuned factory whips, then you will out of the shorties.  But remember, the factory whips are badly out of tune...I still can't believe the MoCo lets those bikes go that way out of the factory.   Sorry to ramble Iron...
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
:devil:

Thanks, RD...I appreciate your expertise in this area, as I know as much about a CB and how it works as a cat does about a shotgun.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on April 05, 2007, 09:11:31 AM
Thanks, RD...I appreciate your expertise in this area, as I know as much about a CB and how it works as a cat does about a shotgun.

Terry,
You been watching my cats out on the skeet range lately??  One of them is getting pretty good.   :P :rifle:
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
   :devil:
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RJ749 on April 05, 2007, 09:27:11 AM
Thanks, RD... I know as much about a CB and how it works as a cat does about a shotgun.


Terry,
You been watching my cats out on the skeet range lately??  One of them is getting pretty good.   :P :rifle:
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
   :devil:



CAT SHOOTS OWNER

Thursday, March 10, 2005

(03-10) 16:31 PST BATES TOWNSHIP, Mich. (AP) --


A man cooking in his kitchen was shot after one of his cats knocked his 9mm handgun onto the floor, discharging the weapon, Michigan State Police said.


Joseph Stanton, 29, of Bates Township in Iron County, was shot in his lower torso around 6 p.m. Tuesday, the state police post in Iron River reported. He was transported to Iron County Community Hospital.


Michelle Sand, a spokeswoman at the Iron River hospital, said Stanton was treated there before being transferred to Marquette General Hospital for further treatment. But Marcie Miller, a representative of the Marquette facility, said there was no record of the hospital receiving a patient by that name.


A telephone message seeking comment was left Wednesday at Stanton's home.


State police said he was cooking at his stove when the cat knocked the loaded gun off the kitchen counter behind him.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2005/03/10/national/a045518S42.DTL

Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Midnight Rider on April 05, 2007, 11:09:23 AM
Cat's are spitefull things...I like 'em, but they do chit on purpose.

I do appreciate the CB explanations...in a million years I would never have guessed the whole height thing with the antenna.
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on April 05, 2007, 01:21:41 PM
Cat's are spitefull things...I like 'em, but they do chit on purpose.

I do appreciate the CB explanations...in a million years I would never have guessed the whole height thing with the antenna.
Terry,
My cats are a trip...and you're right, they do things on purpose, just to pi$$ you off.  :P  Thanks for comments...I hope my comments do contribute a little to the folks in the forum.

Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
   :devil:
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: ultrafxr on April 05, 2007, 01:57:11 PM
Terry,
My cats are a trip...and you're right, they do things on purpose, just to pi$$ you off.  :P  Thanks for comments...I hope my comments do contribute a little to the folks in the forum.

Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
   :devil:

It is not just cats.  Our dog will definitely pout and act out when she gets pi$$ at us. 
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Midnight Rider on April 05, 2007, 02:49:10 PM
It is not just cats.  Our dog will definitely pout and act out when she gets pi$$ at us. 

Oh yea, Jerry...the dogs do it too, but they don't stay pi$$ed very long, it seems.  Cats hold a grudge for days... ;)  I've had some sweet cats before, but I've also had one or two that came out of the womb hissing and spitting...of course one of those was a redhead, so maybe that explains it.  My animals lead the Life of Riley (whew, that one dates me, doesn't it?), but that little chit would bite you for no reason from before he opened his eyes to when he finally disappeared.


Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: Fired00d on April 05, 2007, 02:55:23 PM
Oh yea, Jerry...the dogs do it too, but they don't stay pi$$ed very long, it seems.  Cats hold a grudge for days... ;)  I've had some sweet cats before, but I've also had one or two that came out of the womb hissing and spitting...of course one of those was a redhead, so maybe that explains it.  My animals lead the Life of Riley (whew, that one dates me, doesn't it?), but that little chit would bite you for no reason from before he opened his eyes to when he finally disappeared.



Uh oh!!!! :nervous: My :lipsrsealed2:. I think my brotha may be :wall:. :oops: :huepfenlol2:

 :pumpkin:
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 :fireman:
Title: Re: Antenna
Post by: RedDevil on April 05, 2007, 07:25:50 PM
It is not just cats.  Our dog will definitely pout and act out when she gets pi$$ at us. 
Ultra,
That's definitely the truth...when I was young we had a standard sized dachshund, and if my dad would do something to him, to get back at my dad he'd chit in my dad's shoes, which of course really pissed off my dad which would cause the dog to get upset again...can you see a pattern forming here?   :D :huepfenlol2:
Cheers :2vrolijk_21:,
  :devil: