The torque and horsepower numbers that I saw were measured at the rear wheel. I didn't mention the torque numbers but they were 99, 105, and 105 at the rear wheel on those three dyno tests.
Again all stock motors.
Harley's numbers are at the crank, I believe the rule of thumb is a 10% reduction at the rear wheel, which makes these numbers just about right on.
How do you like the Full Sacs? I plan on installing the X pipe and 2" cores as well. Is the sound about right, too quite or too loud?
OK, that makes more sense. Thanks. I am obviously not very knowledgeable on the subject.
As for the Fullsac set up, I am very happy. Great sound and smooth feel. Much cooler without the stock head pipe/cc.
I also helped my brother put on a 2.5 set with CVO mufflers and the x-pipe on his limited. He is very happy. The nice thing about the 103 was the dyno-tuned tune file for the 103 WH that comes with the TTS.
It worked perfectly right out of the box.
Too bad there is not a "dyno-ed" tune file for the 110's. The 110 tune file that came with the TTS was only a "ballpark" tune IMO. I got a lot of popping and it basically just sucked. I didn't have the time nor inclination to mess with the flight recorder, etc. so I took my bike to a local legend who I think did very well with the tune. When I think of it, I will post my dyno sheet. From what I can tell, it makes power at the low end and holds pretty well through 5k. It just "feels" good to me. One thing he told me was that he fattened it up a bit to keep it running cooler. Important stuff down here in Tejas!
Regards,
Mark