Shovelhead Bob,
This was a dyno for a 110" on this site by Bragging Rights. THEOZZ needed a map to help him out, so I shared one with him. This map ran with no problems and was safe to give him producing 105 hp and 86 hp.
And he OZZ said
I'm going to have it tuned as soon as I can get away from work and would like to get it running cooler and better performance until I have a chance at getting it dyno tuned.
Each bike is slightly different no matter if the components are exactly the same. If he was just going to bypass the tune I probably wouldnt have posted this to get him by, but since he said he was going to get it tuned there was no harm in running this it is definately not a lean map.
If you have better that is safe to give him then go ahead and share it with him. That is exactly what was done here. The map is running in open loop, because that is how the tuner set it up for him.
Ron, changed from SERT / 255 to TMAX / 575, so there was no chance to do anything with the Twin Scan which I own one of now after he switched.
Actually I don't tune a bike this way I run the twin scan and use volumetric efficiency against target afr.
Although I did have issues with the cloosed loop bias and it's limit to bring down ratios, but that isnt the point here.
on the technical side of your questions:
When on a dyno I do fixed AFR at 13.0 to 1 and tune for flat fuel curve from 0- 40 percent throttle
From there I do sweeps and then once all the volumetrics are set correctly. Also lets not forget to turn off the knock sensor. Then go back in and put the VE fixes against the originating map and adjust the timing
Hope you have something to share for free with the guy, like this map that was in a bike and ran fine could it be better maybe, but it was just that something to help him out.