Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Wheelsnkeels]

What pipes are those? Couldn't figure it out by what I read. Those things look great!!!

they are called "Boom Cans" My dealer ordered them from www.milwaukeebagger.com and got me a discount. They came with installation instructions labeled "BUB" so I am assuming they make them now?

They originally were manufactured by Drag Specialties not only do they not make them. they aren't even carried in the catalog?

I love them they sound great and IMHO I haven't seen pipes that fill the extended bags like they should besides these. first saw them on a custom bagger in Milwaukee at the 105th then all over Sturgis.

[Wheelsnkeels]

Turns out the Vance and Hines Power Duals I received are the 2010 version 

For some unknown reason they left the rear O2 sensor on the head pipe in plain view. IMO it should have stayed below out of view but heck noone asked me??

Here is a link to a new video with the Power Duals and Boom Cans installed! 

[LarryB]

good job on the video. not sure if the boom cans are that much different from the stock cans with Fullsacs, sound very close. maybe the baffle in the boom can isn't big enough or is it the 2-1-2 setup that keeps it quiet.
are those Boom reflectors ? im just sayin

[Wheelsnkeels]

Someone not get their coffee this mornig? A little relector-phobic today?

 

[Old Harley Dude]

Wheelskneels,  I like the sound.  I noticed you have replaced your stock passenger pegs with a "floor board" style.  What are they?  HD Part #? Would like to see the platform for its pattern.  Thanks

[Wheelsnkeels]

Wheelskneels,  I like the sound.  I noticed you have replaced your stock passenger pegs with a "floor board" style.  What are they?  HD Part #? Would like to see the platform for its pattern.  Thanks

The CVO is called the Rumble Collection here are the part nmbers.

Here's the CVO Rumble collection Part numbers:

Adjustable Highway Peg Mounting Kit- Short Angled    50830-07
(This allows you to reuse the passenger pegs as highway pegs)

The following are the part numbers for the swept wing (passenger) rumble collection footboard inserts:
Assy Rumble Footboard, Psngr        51510-09   MSRP - $109.09 each
Assy Rumble Footboard, Psngr        51502-09   left and right inserts
(pan mount to frame)              

Passenger Footboard (pans)      50357-04 logo Grooved chrome pans or
                                             50768-07  Smooth chrome pans

Chrome Footboard Brackets        53070-00

Service parts not included in kits above:
Pivot Pin (4) needed   50933-86
Ball (2) needed          8860
Spring (2) needed      33085-74
 
 
 

 
 
 

[Old Harley Dude]

What's the total on that?  Looks like a bunch.

[JCZ]

What's the total on that?  Looks like a bunch.

Of course......they're Harley parts.

[Wheelsnkeels]

What's the total on that?  Looks like a bunch.

Dolt have that answer as I had the dealer include the swept wing passenger floorboards in the deal. They however installed the standard streamliners and I had to order and install the Rumble inserts to match!

The dealers had no clue what parts actually matched the CVO's I found the numbers in this forum! Big surprise

The inserts were 89.99 each to me

If I had to guess about 450.00 before discounts

[GILLY]

I assume you haven't had any handling concerns swapping the contrast Agitators for the mirror chrome Agitators. The reason I ask is that I want to do the same thing and was told by HD technical that due to the increased weight of the chrome over the powder coat that the added unsprung weight caused handling issues on any Touring bike with a Batwing fairing. I don't believe it. There are so many reasons that contradict that thinking that I can't begin to list them. I think it's a Marketing call due to most everyone wanting to go chrome over their decision to go with powdercoating. Thanks for listening...

[JCZ]

I assume you haven't had any handling concerns swapping the contrast Agitators for the mirror chrome Agitators. The reason I ask is that I want to do the same thing and was told by HD technical that due to the increased weight of the chrome over the powder coat that the added unsprung weight caused handling issues on any Touring bike with a Batwing fairing. I don't believe it. There are so many reasons that contradict that thinking that I can't begin to list them. I think it's a Marketing call due to most everyone wanting to go chrome over their decision to go with powdercoating. Thanks for listening...

Interesting Gilly.  To that statement I'd like to know how they explain the all chrome wheels on the SEUC.

[HawgDoc]

Gilly's statement is correct. There is a weight (spinning inertia) limit that the full chrome agitator wheel exceeds for use on 'batwing' models. The full chrome SEUC wheel falls below this spec limit, but it's a different wheel.
The chrome Agitator wheel fits of course, just technically a tad too heavy and 'could' cause handling issues. Therefore 'not a correct application.'

[Sapper6]

Gilly's statement is correct. There is a weight (spinning inertia) limit that the full chrome agitator wheel exceeds for use on 'batwing' models. The full chrome SEUC wheel falls below this spec limit, but it's a different wheel.
The chrome Agitator wheel fits of course, just technically a tad too heavy and 'could' cause handling issues. Therefore 'not a correct application.'

If correct I find this quite amazing, thanks HawgDoc.  That said I'm curious to here a review from the owners out there who've received the all chrome agitators on their SESG's.

[Wheelsnkeels]

good job on the video. not sure if the boom cans are that much different from the stock cans with Fullsacs, sound very close. maybe the baffle in the boom can isn't big enough or is it the 2-1-2 setup that keeps it quiet.
are those Boom reflectors ? im just sayin

Got in a little ove 125 miles today on the new exhaust big difference with the Power Duals.

Are you ready to Rumble!!

Can you hear me NOW

[Wheelsnkeels]

I assume you haven't had any handling concerns swapping the contrast Agitators for the mirror chrome Agitators. The reason I ask is that I want to do the same thing and was told by HD technical that due to the increased weight of the chrome over the powder coat that the added unsprung weight caused handling issues on any Touring bike with a Batwing fairing. I don't believe it. There are so many reasons that contradict that thinking that I can't begin to list them. I think it's a Marketing call due to most everyone wanting to go chrome over their decision to go with powdercoating. Thanks for listening...

Not sure if this was asked of me? I am still running contrast Agitators. I plan to replace them with Chrome wheels most likely RC Components. As soon as I determine whats necessary to get a 21 under the front fender and a 200mm in the back they will get ordered.