Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[hd-dude]

Here's a link to a PDF file for the 2009 Model Year Tech Forum

It is a large pdf document that outlines the 2009 model changes

[BALIS]

Thanks for the info.

[d o g o l s]

Here's a link to a PDF file for the 2009 Model Year Tech Forum

It is a large pdf document that outlines the 2009 model changes

thanks 

[Screamin]

Good poop. Thanks Jim.

[sportygordy]

Here's a link to a PDF file for the 2009 Model Year Tech Forum

It is a large pdf document that outlines the 2009 model changes

Good Post,, thanks.. This is going to keep me busy on the Pot for awhile. 

[CVOJOE]

Thanks Jim, nice to see the comparison between MOCO model lines.   
Joe

[Chief]

Great post Jim. Thanks.

Looking at the frame diagrams, it doesn't look like they've done anything to cure rear-steer. The swing-arm is still mounted to the tranny and hangs onto two big rubber donuts on the rear. What they have done is send every single rear stabilizer bracket manufacturer back to the drawing board since they've changed the two mounting points that everyone uses for attaching the brackets.

I guess in their eyes, it's a win-win day for them when they can make things easier on them and harder on the aftermarket.

[skreminegul07]

Great post Jim. Thanks.

Looking at the frame diagrams, it doesn't look like they've done anything to cure rear-steer. The swing-arm is still mounted to the tranny and hangs onto two big rubber donuts on the rear. What they have done is send every single rear stabilizer bracket manufacturer back to the drawing board since they've changed the two mounting points that everyone uses for attaching the brackets.

I guess in their eyes, it's a win-win day for them when they can make things easier on them and harder on the aftermarket.

Chief, don't you think with an upper motor mount in the front and two lower mounts at the bottom of each down tube plus the rear mounts will eliminate or reduce the twist?
BTW, Rev Tech just announced their own version of a stabilizer inside front cover of new AIM.

[Hoist!]

Chief, don't you think with an upper motor mount in the front and two lower mounts at the bottom of each down tube plus the rear mounts will eliminate or reduce the twist?
BTW, Rev Tech just announced their own version of a stabilizer inside front cover of new AIM.

 

Hoist!

[mrmagloo]

Here's a link to a PDF file for the 2009 Model Year Tech Forum

It is a large pdf document that outlines the 2009 model changes

This user is out of bandwidth.

       

[hd-dude]

This user is out of bandwidth.

       

I can email a copy to you....

[Chief]

Chief, don't you think with an upper motor mount in the front and two lower mounts at the bottom of each down tube plus the rear mounts will eliminate or reduce the twist?
BTW, Rev Tech just announced their own version of a stabilizer inside front cover of new AIM.

The problem is not twisting, but shifting, side to side. The rear of the motor is not located laterally with any precision and there isn't anything back there to prevent side loads on the rear tire from shoving the whole kit an kaboodle sideways. The brackets all aimed to give a rigid mount to the transmission pan to prevent any sideways shifting.

I still see two big rubber donuts in the back which tells me, more of the same.

I saw that. "Just in time for obsolescence" I thought.

[Twolanerider]

Hoist!

For reference here is one currently listed on eBay:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250271166161

[skreminegul07]

For reference here is one currently listed on eBay:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250271166161

Looks like patent infringement to me.

[sportygordy]

Anyone have reviews our feedback on the Glide Pro's? I talked to a guy this morning that swears by it.. But i have a hard time thinking of the $400 bucks for a couple of bushings and shaft...


http://www.glide-pro.com/?gclid=CMrXtazl8JQCFSY1agodfw9crQ