Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]  All

Author Topic: Anyone Tried the Cee Bailys Windshield?  (Read 2482 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

LarryB

  • Tennessee Squire
  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3656

    • CVO1: 09 FLTRSE3 The Grey Ghost
Re: Anyone Tried the Cee Bailys Windshield?
« Reply #15 on: January 02, 2009, 07:11:22 PM »

I agree, there has been much too much talk of inseam here. as long as your seam is in, it's fine. But when it seams out, eeeewwww i hate when that happens
Logged
Take it Easy Greasy Cuz it's a long walk home.

Did I shave my head for this?

Highjagger

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2523
  • tradition`s not worship ash but pass on the fire

    • CVO1: FXSE Breakout Pro Street 2016 ,- and 2011 Crossbones FLSTSB ,- and 2016 LowRider s FXDLs
Re: Anyone Tried the Cee Bailys Windshield?
« Reply #16 on: January 03, 2009, 01:56:27 AM »

Muhuhaha ,
I never heard of inseam before entering this board , but on the windshield-sites  they allways talk about it .  :thinking2: :znotworthy:
Logged
Success is to stand up one more than to fall down

HDDOCFL

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1032
  • Never Say Never
Re: Anyone Tried the Cee Bailys Windshield?
« Reply #17 on: January 03, 2009, 05:36:13 AM »

I believe they use the inseam vs height to get torso height, ass to eyes.  I am 6,1" 32" inseam you guess what the ass to eyes height is. LOL   Doc
Logged

HDDOCFL

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1032
  • Never Say Never
Re: Anyone Tried the Cee Bailys Windshield?
« Reply #18 on: January 03, 2009, 05:43:07 AM »

I ordered the FullSacs and was talked into getting the 2 1/4" baffles for the sound I want, said it would be quieter than the rhineharts, he also informed me that he is working on a header system that is a true 2 into 1 into 2 useing the stock heatshields, should be interesting to see what he comes up with. He is really into this new header.  Doc
Logged

LarryB

  • Tennessee Squire
  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3656

    • CVO1: 09 FLTRSE3 The Grey Ghost
Re: Anyone Tried the Cee Bailys Windshield?
« Reply #19 on: January 03, 2009, 07:21:12 AM »

Yes, Steve is close on the nhead  pipes, but the issue with the 2 1/4 baffles is the lack of back pressure needed to provide low end torque. at WOT they are great, but leaving the light?
Logged
Take it Easy Greasy Cuz it's a long walk home.

Did I shave my head for this?

HDDOCFL

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1032
  • Never Say Never
Re: Anyone Tried the Cee Bailys Windshield?
« Reply #20 on: January 03, 2009, 10:34:47 AM »

If that becomes a problem I will add lolipops. Steve said he has seen no problems with lack of back pressure because of the way the headers are designed, he states his new headers will also not have a problem.  Thanks Doc   PS, I have seen lack of back pressure in other headers also even the 2 into 1.  Hope steve is right.
Logged

Beemer

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 690
  • USAF CMSgt (Ret)

    • CVO1: 2009 FLTRSE3 Electric Orange/Vivid Black
    • CVO2: 2015 FLTRUSE Autumn Haze/Carbon Dust
Re: Anyone Tried the Cee Bailys Windshield?
« Reply #21 on: January 03, 2009, 11:29:11 AM »

Well, if he can make them where we can use our stock heat shields the price should be considerably less than anything else out there that come with new shields,  The shields require more time and cost to manufacture than the header pipe itself!
Logged

Beemer

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 690
  • USAF CMSgt (Ret)

    • CVO1: 2009 FLTRSE3 Electric Orange/Vivid Black
    • CVO2: 2015 FLTRUSE Autumn Haze/Carbon Dust
Re: Anyone Tried the Cee Bailys Windshield?
« Reply #22 on: January 03, 2009, 11:31:22 AM »

 :oops:  If we keep going in this direction, we might as well start a new thread :jack: :nixweiss:
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All
 

Page created in 0.129 seconds with 25 queries.