OK got the X "B" header installed, the 2 inch cores and the bike sounds and runs good.
I also have the TTS and Steves map for this combination, and I"ve been a TTS user for quite a while, and generally the consensus for any map is that in order for the AFR/Lambda tables to properly apply the desired AFR, it's important that the VE values be established for the engine
you are using.
Now this is not to say that anything is wrong at all with the map provided by Steve.
However, we know not every engine is exactly the same, so I am considering
making a copy of the map per TTS, loading the copy (keeping the original)
into the ECM and doing VE tuning runs, I want to see what if any changes
the TTS software is reading from the VE log and if there are any significant
changes to be made.
Now I am not talking about changing the lambda values for target AFR
or the timing (yet but that idle timing - heat issue is going to be addressed LOL)
however if in fact the target AFR/Lambda figures are spot on,
then the only way they can be hit is if the VE's are spot on for that particular build.
Once the VE's are properly set then the tune can be fine
tuned making runs for knock and other factors. There is a
big discussion going on HTT about Ion Knock in the ECM and
it's intrusion into the equation as it can take out a significant
amount of timing at any one instance, killing power..
One guy had severe cases of Ion Knock retard going on with
one cylinder and found replacing the plug solved most of it.
Anyway, Hopefully I'll get the map, laptop and 7 inch Video up
and running (rain holding off) this evening and get some
tuning runs done.
I can always kick back to Steves base map, but I really want to do it
to find out if there is more that I need to do...