Thanks for the replies.
I've read many posts on lubricants (here) over the last few months. Respectfully(!): many posts just seem to echo the consensus. Consensus is fine(!) if it's based on independent tests, individual experience over time (one product vs. others) etc. But sometimes consensus amounts to "I use XYZ oil because everybody else does".
Sometimes the consensus here(?) seems based on studies w/scientific graphs, data, industry standards & terminology. Cool. But when studies are *purchased* by a company that sells oil..? The 'vested interest' thing undermines the notion of scientific objectivity. If I was oil company XYZoil, I would shop for test results that would sell my product. No dishonesty implied (or needed)! That's just the way it works: commercially, in a courtroom, etc.
All that just makes me a common sense "show me" kind of skeptic. I got hooked on Royal Purple for my Cummins diesel Dodge. Love it (and I tow boats/RV stuff over the mountains in summer). RP is getting bigger all the time in Racing circles. That means a lot to me: those guys have tons invested in high performance 'chinery. Harleys? Last year I switched from Syn3 to Royal Purple Racing 41 in both my SERG & SERK: liked the look, feel and performance. And it's concord Purple: like me! LOL This month: bought a case of RP Cycle-Max 20W-50 on Amazon for $120 less a $20 discount. Loved the racing oil, but want the stabilizers found in the Cycle-Max V-Twin product.
I'll go through this case and see how things run, riding around San Diego county, Laughlin & the SW. I am not an oil expert, and I have no vested interest in any commercial motorcycle products.
Best regards to all, thank you for your guidance and have a great SAFE 2007!