Using the old style clutch release plate wouldn't help, since the hydraulics would remove any play in the release rod that you introduce with the adjustment, up to the limits of the travel of the actuator of course.
Using an adjustable lever to move the release and engage point closer to the grip, assuming you could find one designed to work with your hydraulic master cylinder, just introduces a different problem. That would be insufficient travel to completely release the clutch. So it would be a fine line between moving the engagement point closer to the grip and having the clutch release completely.
Harley has obviously changed something, since the older models had the opposite problem with the engagement point too close to the grip, especially when any air was in the system. The obvious difference is the A&S clutch of course, but there also might be a difference in the master cylinder. Lever "free play" is determined by the location of the bleed hole between the reservoir and piston, with no real pressure developed until the piston moves far enough to block the hole. The reason I wonder about that is the change in the specs Harley published for minimum release rod travel. The older bikes had a spec of .065", the newer bikes have a spec of .080". Since the piston sizes of the actuator and master cylinder didn't change, the travel should have remained the same. If someone were to install an earlier model M/C on a bike exhibiting this 90% problem, I wonder if that alone might make a difference?
In theory at least, the stack height of the actual clutch should only cause this problem IF the actuator was reaching it's physical limits of travel. If the system is designed correctly, which of course is a big IF, those limits should not be reached during normal operation. So the next question in my mind is, what could the change to the A&S setup have possibly contributed to this situation?
Just some rambling thoughts that have been rattling around in my noggin for some time now. Getting to the real root cause is going to take some serious digging by some people with a lot more access to design details as well as all the parts. That would normally be something the manufacturer would be best equipped to handle, but until the MoCo admits there is a problem and then decides to find and fix the cause(s), odds are it won't be fixed. So we are once again back to the old way of doing things; let the customers throw money at the problem hoping to find a fix on their own. Some things at H-D never really change.
Jerry