Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4  All

Author Topic: Dyno Test! Stock heads and TB VS CNC heads and 58TB  (Read 18805 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GMR-PERFORMANCE

  • Vendor
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1769
    • TX

Re: Dyno Test! Stock heads and TB VS CNC heads and 58TB
« Reply #30 on: July 29, 2016, 12:02:28 PM »

I run a fuel transducer on my dyno and have logged many hours of pressure..  The manufacture gives you a spec its 80% ok  However the issue that you run into when many think they need a larger injector is in fact not the injectors issues at but lack of volume.  In a car we run a fuel rail build it bigger you run a larger rail.. There are now larger rails for the HD as most performance shops figured this out long ago. Run a larger injector my drop the duty cycle but you may also be spraying on a closed valve as you ran out of time to fill the cylinder based on cam timing or maybe lack of injector timing control .

I build a 245 hp pro charger bike on a 5.3 injector. I did this with the use of a 1:1 rising rate reg and a aeromotive pump . As in this deal you run a massive inejector to make the peak power but sown low its a mother to tune as the duty cycle is so short..  The 143 I just did was running less than .9 MS at idle and that not taking into account dwell time.  But up top it was right at 90% DS

I would not be surprised to see a rising rate system or DI in the future
Logged
2012 SHARK  S&S 124 150/140   www.gmrperformance.com

Classic Beast

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 535
    • BC

    • Bob McImages
Re: Dyno Test! Stock heads and TB VS CNC heads and 58TB
« Reply #31 on: July 29, 2016, 02:12:16 PM »

Those SE CNC heads are awesome performers out of the box.

Here's the before and after dyno runs when I added the TTS 100 cams to the mix. Amazing TQ from a little 103 with 9.8 compression.

SG

I wonder if I might do better with the TTS cams when I did the static compression it was at 205psi on both cylinders I guess it would be splitting hairs at this point and I am pleased how it runs
Logged
2012 Road glide ultra 103
DD7 Baker, S&S 570, Fulsac DX, 2"
SE CNC heads 58mm throttle body
95 FLSTN
127" Ultima
DD6 Baker
3 X PM 6 piston calipers
S&S Clutch
Lindal Ceramic discs
RB Black Hole pipe
Thunderstar mags
6 gal tanks
Custom Chrome front end
Rear chain drive
150WW Avon Venom rear tire
2009 Cadillac CTS-V

Para Bellum

  • Si vis pacem, para bellum.
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1943

    • CVO1: '07 Canyon Copper FXSTSSE, '08 Crystal Copper SEUC
    • CVO2: '11 Slate/Blk SERGU, '18 Twisted Cherry RGU
Re: Dyno Test! Stock heads and TB VS CNC heads and 58TB
« Reply #32 on: July 30, 2016, 12:33:08 AM »

Run a larger injector my drop the duty cycle but you may also be spraying on a closed valve as you ran out of time to fill the cylinder based on cam timing or maybe lack of injector timing control .
I'm having trouble understanding this aspect.  Doesn't a larger injector spray more fuel (in a fixed amount of time, at a set pressure) than a smaller injector?  It seems the injectors need to be sized properly to inject during the available time (valve open), with consideration given to the use of the bike (street ridden vs. racing, so more time spent at street RPM or at flat-out RPM).
Logged
If you want peace, prepare for war.

GMR-PERFORMANCE

  • Vendor
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1769
    • TX

Re: Dyno Test! Stock heads and TB VS CNC heads and 58TB
« Reply #33 on: July 30, 2016, 09:12:58 AM »

its based on what tuner you have ..  Cam timing is controlling when the injector fires  TTS at this point is the most simple tuner to alter that.. PV can be done but not per say by the end user. SE tuner you are stuck with what ever you have.  And yes a larger injector does flow more however based on what tuner you are using and the amount ( volume of fuel) you have on had at that given time will dictate how much really gets into the engine .



Its a multi faceted process..
Logged
2012 SHARK  S&S 124 150/140   www.gmrperformance.com

North Star

  • CANADA- Love it or Leave it
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1678
    • ON


    • CVO1: 2009 CVO Road Glide- Orange/Black
    • CVO2: 2015 Ducati Monter 821- Star White
Re: Dyno Test! Stock heads and TB VS CNC heads and 58TB
« Reply #34 on: July 31, 2016, 02:33:29 AM »

I thought you were running the TTS100 cams and 58 mm TB in that bike?
Logged
2009 Screamin' Eagle Road Glide- Electric Orange/Vivid Black
GMR 113", GMR 600 cams, Fullac DX & Kuryakyn Crushers, SE Heavy Breather, tuned by "Dyno Dave" Stoddart
Jagg 10 row fan assisted oil cooler
Axeo Legends/Ohlins 3-3/True Track front and rear
C&C Fastback seat w/orange flame stitching & a Le Pera Maverick
PYO Monkey Bars- 10"
Freedom Shields 12" light grey
Hawg Wired "six pack"amp/speakers, Iron Cross ipod interface
HD Daymaker headlights
Detachable King Tour Pak in Electric Orange

Fullsac Performance

  • Vendor
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1753
  • Never ride with a Halfsac! Insist on Fullsac Perf!
    • AZ

    • Fullsac Performance
Re: Dyno Test! Stock heads and TB VS CNC heads and 58TB
« Reply #35 on: July 31, 2016, 09:53:47 AM »

I thought you were running the TTS100 cams and 58 mm TB in that bike?

We have two builds being discussed in this thread.

A 103 with TTS 100s. And a 107 Tman 600s.

Both have the DX Pipe, 58 TB, stock injectors and SE CNC heads.

SG
Logged
Steve@fullsac.com  www.fullsac.com
Never argue with idiots. They will beat you with experience.

Ridgerunr

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 921
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • TN

Re: Dyno Test! Stock heads and TB VS CNC heads and 58TB
« Reply #36 on: August 02, 2016, 08:00:32 AM »

Just noticed this, fine work as usual Steve.
There's a guy on the Roadglide forum that says having head work done is a waste of time/$$. I'll reference this for him.
Logged
2004 Roadglide 113" (sold)
2014 CVO RoadKing
2015 RGS

GMR-PERFORMANCE

  • Vendor
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1769
    • TX

Re: Dyno Test! Stock heads and TB VS CNC heads and 58TB
« Reply #37 on: August 02, 2016, 10:05:26 AM »

At some point we need to put together a sticky folder with the proper ex set vs not correct.. I just got done tuning a 117 SE kit with the CNC heads was not great as they ran VH high out put mufflers.. Best parts on the planet will not matter if the ex is wrong. 
Logged
2012 SHARK  S&S 124 150/140   www.gmrperformance.com

Fullsac Performance

  • Vendor
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1753
  • Never ride with a Halfsac! Insist on Fullsac Perf!
    • AZ

    • Fullsac Performance
Re: Dyno Test! Stock heads and TB VS CNC heads and 58TB
« Reply #38 on: August 02, 2016, 03:55:38 PM »

 Best parts on the planet will not matter if the ex is wrong.


True statement! Just ask Bruce Jenner how his new exhaust is working out?   :nixweiss: :nixweiss:

Logged
Steve@fullsac.com  www.fullsac.com
Never argue with idiots. They will beat you with experience.

Rooster

  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5180
  • FLhtcuse2.ORG
Re: Dyno Test! Stock heads and TB VS CNC heads and 58TB
« Reply #39 on: August 02, 2016, 06:24:32 PM »

Best parts on the planet will not matter if the ex is wrong.


True statement! Just ask Bruce Jenner how his new exhaust is working out?   :nixweiss: :nixweiss:
EWWWWWW :nervous:
Logged

Unbalanced

  • FUD Examiner
  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6708

    • CVO1: 2011 SESG,
    • CVO2: 2004 SEEG Pumpkin,
    • CVO3: 2002 Police Roadking, Maudie and Maybelle Slayer
Re: Dyno Test! Stock heads and TB VS CNC heads and 58TB
« Reply #40 on: August 02, 2016, 06:35:43 PM »

It might flow better if he removed some of the packing.  :nixweiss: :nixweiss:
Logged
HBRR Florida Chapter,  STILL - The Fastest Chapter - Proven yet again Bikeweek 2017

BostonboyDH

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 522

    • CVO1: FLTRSE3
Re: Dyno Test! Stock heads and TB VS CNC heads and 58TB
« Reply #41 on: August 02, 2016, 06:54:58 PM »

       

           THAT'S JUST WRONG :vrolijk27:
Logged

Fullsac Performance

  • Vendor
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1753
  • Never ride with a Halfsac! Insist on Fullsac Perf!
    • AZ

    • Fullsac Performance
Re: Dyno Test! Stock heads and TB VS CNC heads and 58TB
« Reply #42 on: August 02, 2016, 07:12:12 PM »

It might flow better if he removed some of the packing.  :nixweiss: :nixweiss:

You nailed it. (no pun intended) At the onset of confusion, the exhaust port was re-assigned.
Welcoming directional flow change and constant packing.
Bad Chit. (again no pun intended)

SG
« Last Edit: August 02, 2016, 07:14:32 PM by Fullsac Performance »
Logged
Steve@fullsac.com  www.fullsac.com
Never argue with idiots. They will beat you with experience.

Para Bellum

  • Si vis pacem, para bellum.
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1943

    • CVO1: '07 Canyon Copper FXSTSSE, '08 Crystal Copper SEUC
    • CVO2: '11 Slate/Blk SERGU, '18 Twisted Cherry RGU
Re: Dyno Test! Stock heads and TB VS CNC heads and 58TB
« Reply #43 on: August 02, 2016, 07:53:52 PM »

You nailed it. (no pun intended)
Bad Chit. (again no pun intended)
SG
I call BS!

Pun intended.   ;)
Logged
If you want peace, prepare for war.

JC

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 110
    • OH


    • CVO1: 2021 FLHXSE SUNSET ORANGE/SUNSET BLACK FADE
    • CVO2: 2007 Flhtcuse Sold - 2011 Flhxse sold
    • CVO3: 2015 Flhxse ultraviolet blue/molten lava flames Sold
Re: Dyno Test! Stock heads and TB VS CNC heads and 58TB
« Reply #44 on: August 02, 2016, 08:09:20 PM »

At some point we need to put together a sticky folder with the proper ex set vs not correct.. I just got done tuning a 117 SE kit with the CNC heads was not great as they ran VH high out put mufflers.. Best parts on the planet will not matter if the ex is wrong.

I also have a 117 with the high output mufflers. What slip-ons would you recommend and what kind of gain would you expect to see?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4  All
 

Page created in 0.164 seconds with 20 queries.