Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All

Author Topic: New 110 - Upgrade Questions: Cam? Compression? 113?  (Read 12588 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

98fxstc

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 200
  • 09 FXDFSE
Re: New 110 - Upgrade Questions: Cam? Compression? 113?
« Reply #30 on: February 03, 2016, 06:12:06 PM »

I have 135hp/133tq on my 113, but I'm running 11.0 to 1 comp. with woods TW999 cams. I also went into the lower end and had Darkhorse do the crank, timken conversion, and H beam rods
and Ward Performance Heads
 :2vrolijk_21:
Those are good numbers
a good 2:1 pipe might have pushed it a bit higher
Logged

Yellow09SERG

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2055

    • CVO1: FLTRSE3 YELLOW!!
Re: New 110 - Upgrade Questions: Cam? Compression? 113?
« Reply #31 on: February 03, 2016, 07:43:16 PM »

I have 135hp/133tq on my 113, but I'm running 11.0 to 1 comp. with woods TW999 cams. I also went into the lower end and had Darkhorse do the crank, timken conversion, and H beam rods

Very nice numbers and good looking graph too! If my comment was taken wrong sorry. I was looking at 10.1 and the expected numbers. At the 11.0:1 and higher its possible. Your dyno shows it as well as Stars. I was more than anything thinking bagger and taking off halfway across the country and getting off in the middle of nowhere and finding the only gas available is 89 and I need gas. My mindset was probably wrong at that point. Very nice motor.  :2vrolijk_21:
Logged
Most great stores start with a bad decision

KC2GIW

  • RUB
  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 280
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • NY


    • CVO1: 2016 White Amethyst CVO Street Glide
Re: New 110 - Upgrade Questions: Cam? Compression? 113?
« Reply #32 on: February 03, 2016, 09:07:25 PM »

Fuel quality was the main reason I made the decision to go 117 over 110 or 113. At 9.9 it'll be a little more forgiving than 10.5-11 if I get91 or 89


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Logged
Matt - Syracuse, NY

2016 White Amethyst FLHXSE.
117 SE drop-in kit.
Jackpot 2:1:2, V&H 450 Titans.

2018 Arctic White Corvette Grand Sport

toddwebber

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 88
    • FL


    • CVO1: 2015 FLHXSE hard candy
    • CVO2: 2013 FXSBSE crimson
    • CVO3: 2012 FLHXSB (sold)
Re: New 110 - Upgrade Questions: Cam? Compression? 113?
« Reply #33 on: February 03, 2016, 09:27:55 PM »

and Ward Performance Heads
 :2vrolijk_21:
Those are good numbers
a good 2:1 pipe might have pushed it a bit higher

I have D&D 2 into 1 pipe for those numbers
Logged
Fuel Moto 113 big bore kit, Ward Performance CNC heads, Wood TW-999 cams, SE cam plate, Zippers chain tensioners, Darkhorse lower end, H beam rods, Timken bearing, SE 58mm TB, 5.3 injectors, AIM clutch, D&D Boarzilla 2/1, Dynojet Power Vision, Dynojet Target Tune, JRI rear shocks, Legend AXEO front shocks

toddwebber

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 88
    • FL


    • CVO1: 2015 FLHXSE hard candy
    • CVO2: 2013 FXSBSE crimson
    • CVO3: 2012 FLHXSB (sold)
Re: New 110 - Upgrade Questions: Cam? Compression? 113?
« Reply #34 on: February 03, 2016, 09:34:23 PM »

How's that behave on pump gas? 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I runs great on pump 91/93 gas. Jamie is great on the dyno
Logged
Fuel Moto 113 big bore kit, Ward Performance CNC heads, Wood TW-999 cams, SE cam plate, Zippers chain tensioners, Darkhorse lower end, H beam rods, Timken bearing, SE 58mm TB, 5.3 injectors, AIM clutch, D&D Boarzilla 2/1, Dynojet Power Vision, Dynojet Target Tune, JRI rear shocks, Legend AXEO front shocks

toddwebber

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 88
    • FL


    • CVO1: 2015 FLHXSE hard candy
    • CVO2: 2013 FXSBSE crimson
    • CVO3: 2012 FLHXSB (sold)
Re: New 110 - Upgrade Questions: Cam? Compression? 113?
« Reply #35 on: February 03, 2016, 09:41:56 PM »

When I was in WI all i could get was 91 and it ran fine. I just moved to FL and they have 93 everywhere. If I'm ever in a situation where 87 is all I can get, then I will only get a gallon or two and ride her easy to the next station. I'm not that worried about it.
Logged
Fuel Moto 113 big bore kit, Ward Performance CNC heads, Wood TW-999 cams, SE cam plate, Zippers chain tensioners, Darkhorse lower end, H beam rods, Timken bearing, SE 58mm TB, 5.3 injectors, AIM clutch, D&D Boarzilla 2/1, Dynojet Power Vision, Dynojet Target Tune, JRI rear shocks, Legend AXEO front shocks

Yellow09SERG

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2055

    • CVO1: FLTRSE3 YELLOW!!
Re: New 110 - Upgrade Questions: Cam? Compression? 113?
« Reply #36 on: February 03, 2016, 10:08:16 PM »

Man I wish 93 was everywhere here. 91 is as good as it gets and even then it is a blended mix. Lots of places you will only find 87 or 89.
Logged
Most great stores start with a bad decision

fkjunkin

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 59
Re: New 110 - Upgrade Questions: Cam? Compression? 113?
« Reply #37 on: February 05, 2016, 11:48:55 AM »

the 10.5-1/S&S .585 build is a good option.10.0-0 and S&S .570`s is another.a couple things that should be addressed is new lifters (ide recommend S&S standards) and guides when doing heads,(ide recommend AV&V bronze guides).110 heads flowing in the 315 @ 28" area with either cam/compression option above will give very good power & tq in a very reliable "ride it anywhere" build

My 113 at 10.5 w the s&s 585 is what the bike should have been when new, a dependable rocketship. Runs well enough own low but really comes alive when the rpm's get up a bit.  The poster I quoted mentioned that combo a while back and I chose it, some good advice here sometimes  :2vrolijk_21:
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All
 

Page created in 0.139 seconds with 24 queries.