But don`t you think that the autotune modules are a good alternative for people who have not the knowledge to tune a bike ?
I think it`s a better solution than going to a tuner that robbs your bucks and spend hours for dynoruns everytime you change your bike-configuration .
When you are able to do it on your own or when you have a good friend or tuner that earns your trust than you i agree with you and you are right . no problem .
I guess it depends, what you do to your bike. If your just adding pipes and an AC, I'd think twice before spending $300-$400 dollars on a tune. If I did the full ride, cams, heads, pistons, I'd spend the extra money on a dyno tune.
I added pipes and AC to my bike, and downloaded a canned map to my PCIII. It ran fine, but wasn't sure how well the map matched. A local shop had a special, $25 dyno pulls, so I rode my bike there 30 miles, so it was warm, he loaded it on right away, did a pull, most cells and AFR were pretty good except two spots. He said for $50 more he'd put it back on the dyno and change those two areas. So for $75 I got it pretty close, not as good as a full dyno tune, but runs pretty well.
Was going to do the works this winter, but because of uncertainty with work status, I'm holding off!

But when I do I will do a full dyno tune.
If you work with someone that knows their stuff and a canned map that's close, you could probably smooth in the cells not covered by closed loop tuning, just wanted to say that the "Auto Tune" is not just a plug in and let it go process, and if you can't find a close map to your setup you can still have a bad running bike, Just my thoughts.
Craig