Can you get us a copy of the article?
I'll PM you. I don't want to violate any copyright laws here. Needless to say, after speaking to someone who had an advance copy of the aforementioned article, and happened to be quoted in it, his feeling was the same as mine. The article did not do anything to address the problem with the 110" engine and seemed to endlessly ramble on. Other than to have the title "Harley CVO No-NO" splashed on the top of the cover page, no informative information was divulged. It seems the author was more interested in cams, valve lifts and stoichiometrics (yeah, I had to look it up) then he was in anything that was relevant to solving the real world problems associated with 110". It appears as if someone forgot to read the article after it edited.