Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All

Author Topic: ultra limited 103?  (Read 6241 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Unbalanced

  • FUD Examiner
  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6708

    • CVO1: 2011 SESG,
    • CVO2: 2004 SEEG Pumpkin,
    • CVO3: 2002 Police Roadking, Maudie and Maybelle Slayer
Re: ultra limited 103?
« Reply #30 on: May 17, 2010, 07:23:38 PM »

Beautiful Curve bet it runs fantastic, just too bad you arent comparing apples to apples with a skunkworks baffle.   :oops:

I dont know what the owner changed, and it might be nice to find out, but its not apples to apples, but a good troll for business.  

link to the original post for it.  mileage went up too ! from 15k miles to 20k miles ...

http://harleytechtalk.org/htt/index.php/topic,21627.msg221524.html#msg221524

Details:
Deweys Pro Street Heads, by Don, 1.94 7mm intake, Custom, 1.57 Kibblewhite Exhaust valve
10.6/1
HQ CP pistons
Woods TW8g
Jims Stock Ratio Roller Rockers
HPI TB
FatCat with Skunkworks (owner designed) Baffle
Hoban bottom end

Logged
HBRR Florida Chapter,  STILL - The Fastest Chapter - Proven yet again Bikeweek 2017

HD Street Performance

  • Vendor
  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3119
Re: ultra limited 103?
« Reply #31 on: May 17, 2010, 08:07:52 PM »

Yeah you are right but really the baffle if anything should have increased any dip, it is huge (2.25") and perforated (almost light straight pipe but with small holes) but now back to that thread...

One of the posters did mention about the possibility of no dip due to the smaller than traditional exhaust valve. Could that have something to do with it?

Maybe we need to look at the "sum of the parts" rather than trying to find the smoking gun or silver bullet by singling out components.

As far as the miles they are actual, the bike is daily riden rain or otherwise plus trips.
But don't let me confuse things with logic....
Logged

Fullsac Performance

  • Vendor
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1753
  • Never ride with a Halfsac! Insist on Fullsac Perf!
    • AZ

    • Fullsac Performance
Re: ultra limited 103?
« Reply #32 on: May 18, 2010, 04:25:14 AM »

Thanks for all the grat advice I will look into the heads to see if they are the same as on the se103 motors. The zippers 575's look like a good choice. Currently I'm on somewhat of a tight budget so I'm hoping just pipes,ac,tuner and cams will fill the bill.

Tight budget? Here's good bang for the buck.

Fullsac Stage I XPipe sleeper kit. Pretty simple bolt on deal that brings the 103 to life.
Dyno chart shows a stock 103 VS the Stage I XPipe Sleeper kit.
Just for the record, the stock dyno run was from Hogmikes 103.
The second run was from another customers 2010 103 after I installed the XPipe.
Add some 54s and HP would go mid 90s.

Parts list
Fullsac X Pipe 
2.0 cored mufflers
TTS with fuel map
Ness AC.

Steve George


 
Logged
Steve@fullsac.com  www.fullsac.com
Never argue with idiots. They will beat you with experience.

HOGMIKE

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2356
  • 65 FLH 93" + others
Re: ultra limited 103?
« Reply #33 on: May 18, 2010, 10:20:46 AM »

Tight budget? Here's good bang for the buck.

Fullsac Stage I XPipe sleeper kit. Pretty simple bolt on deal that brings the 103 to life.
Dyno chart shows a stock 103 VS the Stage I XPipe Sleeper kit.
Just for the record, the stock dyno run was from Hogmikes 103.
The second run was from another customers 2010 103 after I installed the XPipe.
Add some 54s and HP would go mid 90s.

Parts list
Fullsac X Pipe  
2.0 cored mufflers
TTS with fuel map
Ness AC.

Steve George



Yep, I'll be adding my x-pipe shortly, after tires and a mandatory trip to see my brother!
BTW: This is my tune as it started out I think this was the first pull:

"Bang for the buck"........you bet!!!
 :2vrolijk_21:
Logged
HOGMIKE
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All
 

Page created in 0.129 seconds with 20 queries.